Re(2): Adding addresses to an existing entry

2003-09-13 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Scott at HobbyLink Japan / 9/13/03 / 8:25 AM wrote: I run my Mac primarily with English as the primary language, so I hadn't even noticed that the support had been dropped. Ahhh, that must be what ctmdev was thinking, that no JP support is just a menu issue. My problem with no JP support is

Re: [OT] Re(2): Adding addresses to an existing entry

2003-09-13 Thread Dietmar Harms
The sad part of this is I am in the same situation with my music software/hardware Which is that? For example many VST instruments like Steinberg LM4mkII. -- Best, Dietmar

Re: [OT] Re(2): Adding addresses to an existing entry

2003-09-12 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Ben Kennedy / 9/12/03 / 11:47 AM wrote: I've just (like yesterday) received my brand new MOTU 828mkII and am duly impressed thus far. :) Finally, no more need for OS 9. This is getting off-topic, but since Wayne is also a DP user, be aware that DP4.x on a single proc machine especially TiBook

[OT] Re(2): Adding addresses to an existing entry

2003-09-12 Thread Ben Kennedy
On 12 9 2003 at 11:41 am -0400, Wayne Brissette wrote: The sad part of this is I am in the same situation with my music software/hardware Which is that? I've just (like yesterday) received my brand new MOTU 828mkII and am duly impressed thus far. :) Finally, no more need for OS 9. -b --

Re(2): Adding addresses to an existing entry

2003-09-12 Thread Wayne Brissette
A-NO-NE Music [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Friday, September 12, 2003 stated: My setup won't allow me to go 100% OSX. Here is an expensive piece of equipment which is the hart of my studio, MOTU Digital Time Piece. It's a serial device which does not allow USB-Serial adaptor, and which provide various

Re(2): Adding addresses to an existing entry

2003-09-12 Thread A-NO-NE Music
Scott at HobbyLink Japan / 9/12/03 / 10:11 PM wrote: My vote is to do just that: Go Cocoa, and forget development for OS 8-9. CTM can leave those versions around for people who want them, but they should not invest any more resources into them. Well, the main reason I switched to PM from

Re(2): Adding addresses to an existing entry

2003-09-12 Thread Charles Watts-Jones
On 12 September Scott at HobbyLink Japan wrote: The only reasons for sticking with OS 9 or earlier at this point are inertia, psychological resistance to change, or unwillingness to invest even a modest sum of money [SNIP] What's that? You're still using an old Mac that won't even run OS

Re(2): Adding addresses to an existing entry

2003-09-12 Thread Scott at HobbyLink Japan
For me an obvious addition would be the Apple WebKit, to use Safari- rendering of HTML-mails. On the other hand, that would mean going Cocoa, I guess, and that would be parting from OS 8-9. My vote is to do just that: Go Cocoa, and forget development for OS 8-9. CTM can leave those versions