Re(2): Spam Blocking Software

George Henne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But SpamSieve requires OSX. I'm using OS 9.2.2. Then try SpamFire . -- Regards, Kjell O Alingsås, Sweden Windows Daymares, Why Macs Are Better & Switching to Mac!

Re(2): Spam Blocking Software

wow, quark is still os9? - I used to love quark (not it's upgrade policy) back in 94/95, them being so big, I expected to see them move quickly to osX. my biggy application now which was 'slow' in getting the jump to osX done is formz (modeling software) and they have finally made it too. it too

Re(2): Spam Blocking Software

>But SpamSieve requires OSX. I'm using OS 9.2.2. Just one more great argument to make the switch to OS X, George. Unless you're using Quark XPress on a daily basis, I cannot think of a single reason to stay with 9 at this point. SpamSieve is truly awesome software, as is OS X. --- Scott T. Ha

Re(2): Spam Blocking Software

But SpamSieve requires OSX. I'm using OS 9.2.2. George Henne NS BASIC Corporation http://www.nsbasic.com >I agree. I've been using SpamSieve for months, and my accuracy rate is >96.7%. It's pretty easy to set up and manage, and it's fast. > >Dan > > Or

Re: Re(2): Spam Blocking Software

Not only is it 9, it is not really even recommended to run in Classic... Quark is a wonderful example of how to become arrogant and slow to innovate when you have a large percent of market share. I hope Adobe InDesign continues to be adopted at its rapid pace and whoops them. Now back to our re

Re: Re(2): Spam Blocking Software

Well - I can't help you there...I've been using OSX since it came out. No 9 here. On 5/16/03 2:25 PM, "George Henne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But SpamSieve requires OSX. I'm using OS 9.2.2. > > George Henne > NS BASIC Corporation > http://www.nsbasic.com > >> I agree. I've been usin