Jeremy Hughes said:
>A shrinking number, because we are (or have or will be) switching to
>different email clients. PowerMail doesn't work if you have an email
>database that is larger than 2 GB.
I'd switch if there was a compelling client. I have yet to find one I
like better. I choose PowerMail
Michael J. Hußmann (13/11/07, 13:29) said:
>>> Anyway, even if the mail database was split into several databases, you
>>> could still run against the 2 GB limit.
>>
>> Yes, and you could split a large folder into two smaller folders to deal
>> with this.
>
>Yes, you could, but it's an awkward sol
Jeremy Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>> Anyway, even if the mail database was split into several databases, you
>> could still run against the 2 GB limit.
>
> Yes, and you could split a large folder into two smaller folders to deal
> with this.
Yes, you could, but it's an awkward solution. Fo
Michael J. Hußmann (12/11/07, 20:34) said:
>Anyway, even if the mail database was split into several databases, you
>could still run against the 2 GB limit.
Yes, and you could split a large folder into two smaller folders to deal
with this.
>Wouldn't lifting the 2 GB limit be a more straight-for
Jeremy Hughes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I *really* wish PowerMail would follow other email programs in splitting
> its database into separate databases for each email folder:
I'm not sure I'd agree. I suppose that the internal handling of mails is
much simpler and faster if every mail resides
Bob Parks (11/11/07, 19:45) said:
>TM seems much better suited for use with email programs that maintain a
>lot of separate files rather than one big database.
I *really* wish PowerMail would follow other email programs in splitting
its database into separate databases for each email folder:
1.
Not knowing much about Leopard, not putting it on until it's working
nicely!!, I have however deleted all files ending in .old many times as
they take up SO much space and only appear after compacting Database
anyway so as long as your main Database is working then there is no need
for such files I
After a bit of experimenting with including and excluding various files
from the database backup set, I've got things working. I've left these
files and folders out,
Address Database.old
Custom Dictionary
Custom Sounds
IMAP Cache
Message Database index.old
Message Database Spotlight cache
Message
>Can someone please unsubscribe me? I have tried at the website, but
>doesn't work.
Read the message header
Can someone please unsubscribe me? I have tried at the website, but
doesn't work.
Thank you.
___
Sent with SnapperMail
www.snappermail.com
.. Original Message ...
On Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:56:04 + "Derry Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Bob Parks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Sun,
Bob Parks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] said on Sun, 11 Nov 2007 11:45:06 -0800
>TM seems much better suited for use with email programs that maintain a
>lot of separate files rather than one big database.
I wouldn't bet on that. I'd suspect it's the Message Database index file
that's causing the slow dow
11 matches
Mail list logo
