ah <11msitqs...@seecs.edu.pk>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can check flow in OVS by the following command in xterm of OVS
>>>> ovs-ofctl dump-flows.
>>>> It will show you all the flows in switch which were added.
>>>>
>>>>
&
of OVS
>>> ovs-ofctl dump-flows.
>>> It will show you all the flows in switch which were added.
>>>
>>>
>>>> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:07:46 -0700
>>>> From: Murphy McCauley
>>>> To: Kouvakas Alexandros
>>>> Cc: pox-dev@
lowing command in xterm of OVS
>> ovs-ofctl dump-flows.
>> It will show you all the flows in switch which were added.
>>
>>
>>> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:07:46 -0700
>>> From: Murphy McCauley
>>> To: Kouvakas Alexandros
>>> Cc: pox-d
term of OVS
> ovs-ofctl dump-flows.
> It will show you all the flows in switch which were added.
>
>
>> Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 01:07:46 -0700
>> From: Murphy McCauley
>> To: Kouvakas Alexandros
>> Cc: pox-dev@lists.noxrepo.org
>>
>> Subject: Re: [pox-
t: Re: [pox-dev] POX on planetlab
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> (Inline)
>
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:56 AM, Kouvakas Alexandros wrote:
>
> > Sorry for asking again.Does anybody knows the answer on the above
> question?
>
(Inline)
On Apr 29, 2013, at 12:56 AM, Kouvakas Alexandros wrote:
> Sorry for asking again.Does anybody knows the answer on the above question?
Sorry; I've been busy. Hopefully this brief reply will be helpful.
> 2013/4/23 Kouvakas Alexandros
> Hello,
> I managed to create my network as I wou
Sorry for asking again.Does anybody knows the answer on the above question?
2013/4/23 Kouvakas Alexandros
> Hello,
> I managed to create my network as I would like it to be.
> So, I have one OVS and two hosts connected to it through tunnels.
> Before running the POX controller I delete the flow
Hello,
I managed to create my network as I would like it to be.
So, I have one OVS and two hosts connected to it through tunnels.
Before running the POX controller I delete the flows of the OVS with
"ovs-ofctl del-flows".So, after that I cannot have pings between the
machines.
After that I run the
Hi,
it's a bit irrelevant with pox mailing list but do you know how can I
create an overlay network with one node running OVS and some hosts that are
connected to the OVS through a subnet (let's say 192.168.3.1/24) without
running OVS on them. I mean, can I substitute the tunnel from the host to
th
On Apr 12, 2013, at 2:30 AM, Kouvakas Alexandros wrote:
> Note that only the SENDER (the OF switch) has the controller. By this I mean
> that I run "ovs-vsctl set-controller" only on the SENDER node.
So each machine is running OVS, but only one of the OVS instances is connecting
to a controller
I still don't entirely understand your topology; it seems like you're doing
something a bit unusual. Are the nodes in your topology switches or hosts?
Or both (that is, they're acting as hosts running services or hosting
users or whatever, but they've also got OVS installed)? If they're
switches
I still don't entirely understand your topology; it seems like you're doing
something a bit unusual. Are the nodes in your topology switches or hosts? Or
both (that is, they're acting as hosts running services or hosting users or
whatever, but they've also got OVS installed)? If they're switc
I will try to explain to you what I am trying to do with a different
example.
Let's say that we have the topology below[image: Ενσωματωμένη εικόνα 1]
Let's say that I choose to ping from host .2 to the host .5.
For some reason (possibly due to traffic or something else) I choose to
instruct the pa
It's not entirely clear to me what you're trying to accomplish here. Is it
that when you get a packet to any of the .2/.3./.4, you want to duplicate it
and send it to the other two also? If so, I think this is just three rules,
one which matches on each address. The actions for these are two
Hello again,
I want to install some flows manually to the OF switch. I have an overlay
network with a subnet 192.168.3.1/24. The central node with the OVS is the
one with the IP 192.168.3.1 and there are 3 hosts connected directly to the
central. It's more or less like the Openflow tutorial with mi
On Mar 29, 2013, at 3:28 AM, Felician Nemeth wrote:
>>> My node has python version 2.6.2.
>>
>> Note that you may run into some problems here -- POX's requirement is Python
>> 2.7.
>
> I'd like to mention that it is sometimes not straightforward to install
> a new python version. In which case
Virtualenv is also an option
Sent from my iPhone
On 29/03/2013, at 11:31 PM, Kouvakas Alexandros wrote:
In fact, I managed to install it more or less with this tutorial but with
some changes
http://isezen.com/2011/09/02/how-to-install-locally-python-on-linux-home-directory/
If anybody needs an
In fact, I managed to install it more or less with this tutorial but with
some changes
http://isezen.com/2011/09/02/how-to-install-locally-python-on-linux-home-directory/
If anybody needs any help, do not hesitate.
Cheers
2013/3/29 Felician Nemeth
> >> My node has python version 2.6.2.
> >
> >
>> My node has python version 2.6.2.
>
> Note that you may run into some problems here -- POX's requirement is Python
> 2.7.
I'd like to mention that it is sometimes not straightforward to install
a new python version. In which case, pythonbrew is really useful.
https://github.com/utahta/python
On Mar 28, 2013, at 9:30 AM, Kouvakas Alexandros wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using openflow (openvswitch) on planetlab nodes.
> I have connected a controller on a switch on my central node.
> Despite the fact that POX is running very well I cannot have the command line
> "POX >"
> to make some choices
Hello,
I am using openflow (openvswitch) on planetlab nodes.
I have connected a controller on a switch on my central node.
Despite the fact that POX is running very well I cannot have the command
line "POX >"
to make some choices. I am following the POX wiki and I wanted to try to
test the tutorial
21 matches
Mail list logo