Re: [ADMIN] First test

Ed Leafe wrote: > Testing... > > If this makes it through, don't be surprised if the list goes off- > line again. I still have to add back in the spam filtering, What are you using for spam filtering Ed? We are currently using Spam Assassin on the server but I am not very happy with

[OT] Vote for me, Repeat as needed.

Stephen Russell DBA / .Net Developer Memphis TN 38115 901.246-0159 "Our scientific power has outrun our spiritual power. We have guided missiles and misguided men." Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. http://spaces.msn.com/members/srussell/ -- No virus found in this ou

VAL()

Hi Guys, Does anyone know how VAL() works? Why is it that when you do a VAL('701E960') you get a numeric overflow error, but when you do VAL('701D960'), you don't? Cheers Tristan Leask Software Developer Marine Software Ltd [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.marinesoftware.co.uk -

Re: VAL()

On 11/6/06, Tristan Leask <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Guys, > > Does anyone know how VAL() works? Why is it that when you do a > VAL('701E960') you get a numeric overflow error, but when you do > VAL('701D960'), you don't? > > Cheers > "Val() converts nearly all character strings to numbers—th

Re: [NF] IE7 Breaks Older QuickBooks

On 11/4/06, Kenneth Kixmoeller/fh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Or maybe put it on an older computer that you don't use for surfing, > and leave the older IE on it? > It's still playing with fire. Since IE and its rendering engines (HTML, XML, GIF, etc.) and its runtime engines (Flash, JavaScript

RE: [OT] lady bug infestation in West Virginia

On Sunday, November 05, 2006 10:51 PM Michael Madigan wrote: >We're staying in a hotel in WV and there are a ton of ladybugs everywhere. Anyone else having a >problem with these now? Check out: http://www.whsv.com/news/headlines/4438756.html About 7 years ago we had a bunch of ladybugs in our

HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

How can I close Outlook programatically after is was opened with CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")? TIA George ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

RE: HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

NULL your object reference. oMyOutlook = NewObject("Outlook.Application") ** Do your thing here ** oMyOutlook = NULL HTH, Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of George Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 9:34 AM To: profox@leafe.com Subject

[OT] Show that flag!

Stephen Russell .NET Developer/DBA Gate Gourmet c/o Ciber Forum III 1770 Kirby Parkway, Suite 427 Memphis, TN 38138 901.754.6577 Ext. 6736 Direct: 901.752.6736 Toll Free: 1.800.221.1640 Ext. 6736 __

Typematic rate in List Box

Hi all, What is the setting that controls how long VFP waits for you to key in the first several characters in a list box to navigate to the closest match? I have an app that was working so that the user could type in 3 or 4 of the first characters before the list box adjusted down to the closest

Re: Typematic rate in List Box

At 12:23 PM 11/6/2006 -0500, Philip B wrote: >Hi all, >What is the setting that controls how long VFP waits for you to key in >the first several characters in a list box to navigate to the closest match? ... _DBLCLICK -Charlie ___ Post Messages to:

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:12, Stephen the Cook wrote: > Virgil Bierschwale <> wrote: > > Do you honestly believe that because you throw in the towel, that the > > muslim extremists will stop what they are doing ? > > Removing the ass holes from Washington is the best step we could make. Hi Ste

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

On Saturday 04 November 2006 08:07, Stephen the Cook wrote: > Virgil Bierschwale <> wrote: > > Then you should understand why we are in iraq removing a dictatorship > > that did the same thing. > > I really don't believe that this is the reason we did what we did. Sorry. > > In the situation of a

Re: [OT] lady bug infestation in West Virginia

On Monday 06 November 2006 00:46, Justin Darnell wrote: Hi J! Oh, you guys are talking about real bugs. Never mind (in Emily Latella voice). > I'm in Knoxville, TN. We just now stopped the invasion. There must > have been 3000 in my living room last week. > > J > > On 11/5/06, Michael Madigan

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

On Friday 03 November 2006 18:01, Ed Leafe wrote: > As the critical mid-term elections approach, it's time for everyone > concerned with reversing this march toward endless war and imperial > executive power to get involved. There are two get-out-the-vote > drives Hi Ed! Gee, I do the same

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

On Saturday 04 November 2006 06:02, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > El Sábado 04 Noviembre 2006 00:43, Virgil Bierschwale escribió: > > And you base your understanding of what is happening in iraq from the > > actual people serving over there or perhaps what you hear from the media > > ? > > Well you see. H

Re: [OT] 1 in 5 children can't find the UK on a map.

On Friday 03 November 2006 22:42, Stephen the Cook wrote: > Pete Theisen <> wrote: > >> Besides I am a Feminist. I would love it if a woman pays my bills, > >> and if a woman will open doors for me and give me her seat I am most > >> thankfull and even willing to cook if she goes to work. > > > > H

Re: [OT] lady bug infestation in West Virginia

On Sunday 05 November 2006 22:51, Michael Madigan wrote: Hi Michael! I am using Linux, haven't noticed anything. Must be a Windows only bug. > We're staying in a hotel in WV and there are a ton of > ladybugs everywhere. Anyone else having a problem > with these now? -- Regards, Pete http://ww

Re: [OT] The Company You Keep

On Friday 03 November 2006 15:12, Ed Leafe wrote: > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > Rev. Ted Haggard, who counsels Pres. Bush on a weekly basis and has > been called his "spiritual consigliere", resigned today as president > of the National Association of Eva

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:13, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Nov 3, 2006, at 7:12 PM, Stephen the Cook wrote: > > Removing the ass holes from Washington is the best step we could make. > > Washington, like Nature, abhors a vacuum. Remove the current > assholes, and they will soon be replaced by oth

Re: [OT] Election Fraud already in Tennessee

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:31, john harvey wrote: > Where you been? I'm all over it. Visit my blog at > http://votinginmemphis.blogspot.com or http://www.instapundit.com/ or > http://www.volunteervoters.com/ > > I've found 12 people who appear to have voted twice in early voting and 360 > more

Re: [OT] No children left behind vs military recruitment

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:54, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: Hi Virgil! Just think how many Ms you could kill before you were beheaded. I bet being beheaded is better than cancer. > I did 6 and hated it, BUT I also learned a lot, so I don't regret it.. -- Regards, Pete http://www.pete-theisen.

Re: [NF] Dial-up hell

On Thursday 02 November 2006 01:01, john harvey wrote: Hi Michael! It wasn't that bad back in the day when that was all there was. But once anyone had it the websites began to load up the graphics and it all came to a halt. > Been there, done that. > > John > > I'm sitting at a timeshare in

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

On Saturday 04 November 2006 08:15, Ed Leafe wrote: > Does that accurately reflect what you've been saying? No, of course > not. But that's how your writing looks to everyone else. Hi Ed! Everyoneelse includes me, so I guess you have told me what my preceptions are. Odd that you hit the r

Re: [OT] lady bug infestation in West Virginia

On Monday 06 November 2006 09:50, David Crooks wrote: Hi David! They don't tell you that they have a "politically correct" agenda. > On Sunday, November 05, 2006 10:51 PM Michael Madigan wrote: > >We're staying in a hotel in WV and there are a ton of ladybugs > > everywhere. Anyone else having

RE: [OT] No children left behind vs military recruitment

On Monday, November 06, 2006 2:59 PM Pete Theisen wrote for the second time: >Just think how many Ms you could kill before you were beheaded. I bet being beheaded is better than >cancer. Do we really need to see all of Pete's e-mails? Once was enough... David L. Crooks _

Re: [OT] Election Fraud already in Tennessee

On Friday 03 November 2006 13:52, Michael Madigan wrote: > Could someone tell me why we need early voting? It > just gives the savages time to vote multiple times at > multiple locations. > > The Democrats are going to do everything to steal this > election. > > Criminals. Hi Michael! Now, now.

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

On Friday 03 November 2006 19:12, Ed Leafe wrote: > On Nov 3, 2006, at 6:34 PM, Virgil Bierschwale wrote: > > Do you honestly believe that because you throw in the towel, that > > the muslim extremists will stop what they are doing ? > > Do you honestly believe that your question has any rese

Re: [OT] Fat Lesbian comment gets radio host fired

On Saturday 04 November 2006 00:55, Michael Madigan wrote: > Which part was untrue? She's fat and she's a lesbo. > > > http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/11/03/D8L5ODTO0.html Hi Michael! But Massachusetts may be the most liberal place in the world, Whole different set of rules for Massachusetts

Re: [OT] More Junk Science from the Libs

On Saturday 04 November 2006 01:00, Michael Madigan wrote: > http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061103/D8L59FQ00.html > > Right Wing Gear > http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike Hi Michael! Well, they will probably set up some new rules, drive a bunch of small fisherpersons out of business and t

[ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

I thought that the lists were working OK, but I just found out that no one on the profoxtech list was getting mail. Can at least on PFT subscriber respond to let me know that this made it through? Before you reply, please check that someone hasn't already replied, so that the list doesn

RE: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

I got it, Ed and I am surprised that no one else did in the hour since you sent it. HALinNY => -Original Message- => From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] => [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe => Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 14:27 => To: ProFox List => Subject: [ADMIN] Test of ProFox

Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

Yeap, it worked for me. Regards, LelandJ Hal Kaplan wrote: >I got it, Ed and I am surprised that no one else did in the hour since you >sent it. > >HALinNY > >=> -Original Message- >=> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >=> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe >=> Sent: Monday, Novem

Hentzenwerke, Report Writer & sp2

Does anyone know if Hentzenwerke is planning an eRevision of their book/white papers re Report Writer upgrades in the upcoming sp2? I'm looking for something to get me up to speed, but I don't want to spend my money too soon. Whil? -Lew

[ADMIN] Another Test of ProFoxTech

UPDATE @4:30pm EST: trying again. Found another problem and fixed it, but I need to make sure that this is working OK. Can at least one profoxtech subscriber respond to let me know that this made it through? Before you reply, please check that someone hasn't already replied, so that the

RE: [ADMIN] Another Test of ProFoxTech

On Monday, November 06, 2006 4:32 PM Ed Leafe wrote: > UPDATE @4:30pm EST: trying again. Found another problem and fixed it, but I need to make sure >that this is working OK. Can at least one profoxtech subscriber respond to let me know that this made >it through? >Before you reply, please

RE: [ADMIN] Another Test of ProFoxTech

Got it... Kevin -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 3:32 PM To: ProFox List Subject: [ADMIN] Another Test of ProFoxTech UPDATE @4:30pm EST: trying again. Found another problem and fixed it, bu

[ADMIN] Yet another tech test

Geez, it's amazing how many little things can trip you up! I've found yet another setting that changed from the previous version that was now wrong, so I'm sending another test. If you are on the ProFox*Tech* list, please reply so that I know that this made it through OK. If you

[ADMIN] Yet another tech test

still testing... ___/ / __/ / / Ed Leafe http://leafe.com/ http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

RE: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

I am not sure which list I am on. I am getting your test messages but little else. HALinNY => -Original Message- => From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] => [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe => Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 17:30 => To: ProFox List => Subject: [ADMIN] Yet another te

Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

Leland Jackson wrote .. > Yeap, it worked for me. > > Regards, > > LelandJ > > Hal Kaplan wrote: > > >I got it, Ed and I am surprised that no one else did in the hour since > you sent it. Both of you are subscribed to the regular ProFox list. The problem is with the ProFoxTech subscribers not

Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

Leland Jackson wrote .. > Yeap, it worked for me. > > Regards, > > LelandJ OK, I found another glitch that I ironed out. Let's see if this one works... --Ed --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/mixed text/plain (text body -- kept) ---

Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

Hi. On 11/6/06, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Geez, it's amazing how many little things can trip you up! I've > found > yet another setting that changed from the previous version that was now > wrong, so I'm sending another test. > > If you are on the ProFox*Tech* list, p

RE: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

Ed, I am certain I am on the ProFox Tech list. I got the eMail Helio sent out, but not the original eMail Helio replied to. The 6 most dangerous words in the American language are, "All you have to do is..." Gil > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

ProFoxTech! ... Bingo! Best, Francis I. Coppage, Jr. -Original Message- From: Helio W. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 06, 2006 4:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test Hi. On 11/6/06, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Geez

Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

Ed Leafe wrote: > still testing... I got this original but not the other one. "How hard could it be?" I think your problem is that you're not using MICROSOFT software, because everyone knows that it's Quick and Easy (r) to build all sorts of complex Enterprise-capable software with GENUINE MIC

Re: [ADMIN] Yet another tech test

I just formatted the drive on the spare computer, removed fedora and I'm in the process of putting xp on it and thinking about vista on my laptop (worried about quicken and zip forms) My opinion of linux. Could be very nice, but you need to be a tinkerer and I don't want to spend time tinkering

Re: [OT] Crunch time!

El Lunes 06 Noviembre 2006 17:00, Pete Theisen escribió: > On Saturday 04 November 2006 06:02, Ricardo Aráoz wrote: > > El Sábado 04 Noviembre 2006 00:43, Virgil Bierschwale escribió: > > > And you base your understanding of what is happening in iraq from the > > > actual people serving over there

HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

How can I close Outlook programatically after is was opened with CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")? TIA George ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list:

Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech

Ed, Just got this email (19:14 EST). Good to see you up and running! Malcolm - Original message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 06 Nov 2006 15:57:29 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Test of ProFoxTech Leland Jackson wrote .. > Yeap, it worked for me. > > Re

RE: [OT] 1 in 5 children can't find the UK on a map.

Pete Theisen <> wrote: > I think you have been married to a good woman for a long time and you > just don't know what other women are like nowadays. Nightmare is what > it feels like, but it is really happening. -- Maybe you need to go to different locations to find more variety. Or get one off

Re: HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

oo=CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application") do stuff oo.Quit George wrote: > How can I close Outlook programatically after is was opened with > CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")? > > TIA > > George > -- Richard Kaye Artfact/RFC Systems Voice: 617.219.1038 Fax: 617.219.1001 For the fastest resp

RE: HowTo Close Outlook after CREATEOBJECT("Outlook.Application")

Coming through fine. Pablo Value persons above all, not things. Valora personas sobre todo, no cosas. Peace! *** Paz! ** * -Original Message- * From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Richard Kaye * Sent: Mo

Difference between MSFT and Leafe tech support (Was: [ADMIN] Server changes)

This is _too_ appropos. > > I regret the inconvenience, and have retained Microsoft Customer > Service to ensure that your future ProFox experience is as rewarding and > trouble-free as possible. If you have any further comments, please > direct them to that department, and I'm sure you'l