Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster

2012-03-11 Thread Michael Oke, II
I did not try to update my development box from XP to win7. Just bought another box to run side by side for some time. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Mar 11, 2012, at 8:57 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > Looks like t

Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster

2012-03-11 Thread Lew Schwartz
Looks like that's the way I'll go. I'm doing a lot of graphics work & need lots of memory. Current hardware won't handle it. On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Michael Madigan wrote: > What about Windows 7 64-bit?   Does your hardware support it? > > > - Original Message - > From: "Michael

Re: [OT] But I have two houses....

2012-03-11 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
On 3/10/2012 2:13 PM, Stephen Russell wrote: > > > How pathetic is that? > That's the problem with today's society. -- Mike Babcock, MCP MB Software Solutions, LLC President, Chief S

Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster

2012-03-11 Thread Michael Madigan
What about Windows 7 64-bit?   Does your hardware support it?  - Original Message - From: "Michael Oke, II" To: ProFox Email List Cc: Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 4:58 PM Subject: Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster It should run on the same hardware but you would probably have to look to

Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster

2012-03-11 Thread Michael Oke, II
It should run on the same hardware but you would probably have to look to eBay or someplace similar to locate a copy. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Mar 11, 2012, at 11:23 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > Would you kn

Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster

2012-03-11 Thread Lew Schwartz
Would you know if XP/64 is still an option and if so does it run on the same hardware? On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote: > If you are running the 32-bit version of XP, then yes. It's an OS limitation. > > > Michael Oke, II > 661-349-6221 > > Contents of this and all messages

Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster

2012-03-11 Thread Michael Oke, II
If you are running the 32-bit version of XP, then yes. It's an OS limitation. Michael Oke, II 661-349-6221 Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient. On Mar 11, 2012, at 11:07 AM, Lew Schwartz wrote: > Isn't 4g the XP pro max? ... and even then, video and

Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster

2012-03-11 Thread Lew Schwartz
Isn't 4g the XP pro max? ... and even then, video and system use the top .5. On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Dan Covill wrote: > On 03/10/12 17:13, Lew Schwartz wrote: >> OK, not solved, but pulling all the memory and just blowing all the >> dust I could see out, removing the video and putting b

Re: OT: Memory upgrade disaster

2012-03-11 Thread Dan Covill
On 03/10/12 17:13, Lew Schwartz wrote: > OK, not solved, but pulling all the memory and just blowing all the > dust I could see out, removing the video and putting back the original > mem sticks, letting it start up, power down, reinstall video, power up > worked. Now I'm back to sq 1 with 2 g

Re: win32api SendMessage()

2012-03-11 Thread Man-wai Chang
Oh well... I just discovered WritePad and Word don't report any GUIThreadInfo at all the example that worked with Notepad's caret failed with them. --  .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May