Thanks for the recommendations everyone
Frank.
Frank Cazabon
On 23/08/2012 02:46 PM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
On Thu, August 23, 2012 1:42 pm, Desmond Lloyd wrote:
FWIW,
I find the ergonomic keyboards to be more of a natural feel for the
hands. Love the way the left
Waste of time, unless you have a good reason to use it. RDBMS could
support hierarchical database.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Eurico Chagas Filho
e28cha...@yahoo.com.br wrote:
I have been looking into this, particularly ZODB. I wonder if this can
substitute RDMS with success.
Any one of
I think the best defense is not to rely on a tool or design, but to
exercise your palms and the tunnel muscles periodically, and to
massage the tendons
Nothing can replace rest and sleep, not even money.
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Frank Cazabon frank.caza...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks
The source for SYSTEM.APP is from the GDIPlusX project at VFPX.
http://vfpx.codeplex.com/releases/view/15083
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Paul Newton
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 9:10 AM
To:
Thanks for that Richard - I'll look into it
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Richard Kaye
Sent: 24 August 2012 14:14
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Problem with Foxcharts
The source for SYSTEM.APP is from the
On 08/24/2012 05:35 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote:
I think the best defense is not to rely on a tool or design, but to
exercise your palms and the tunnel muscles periodically, and to
massage the tendons
Nothing can replace rest and sleep, not even money.
+1
Jeff
---
Jeff Johnson
Frank: I have been typing on a keyboard all of my adult life. During
the 90's I started to develop pain in my hands and wrists. It may have
been the beginnings of carpal tunnel. I went with a wave keyboard and
have used them ever since. The pain went away right away and never came
back.
Hi Lew,
SELECT MAX() + 1
can result in two or more people getting the same next ID.
If you were running the system at the same time I was, we could both run
that code at almost the same time and end up with the same ID which
could cause no end of problems.
The standard ways to do this is to
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012, at 02:44 PM, Lew Schwartz wrote:
I never understood why these routines would be any better than max()+1.
Because they are GUIDs - globally unique. That fact is very important in
some applications, but overkill for a lot of others.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at)
On Fri, August 24, 2012 9:30 am, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Frank: I have been typing on a keyboard all of my adult life. During
the 90's I started to develop pain in my hands and wrists. It may have
been the beginnings of carpal tunnel. I went with a wave keyboard and
have used them ever since.
Wow, way over my head, but I've got it and can use it as a stored procedure
and play with it, right? Thanks
Gary
-Original Message-
From: Dave Crozier [mailto:da...@flexipol.co.uk]
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 3:52 AM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: auto increment
Why not use thee
A lot of information. Thanks. For now, the max+1 will work as long as I use
an unfiltered list so that updates through view update only their key record
but logging in users I use a username and encrypted password. They never see
their actual member number id. So is it okay to stay simple with
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Jeff Johnson j...@san-dc.com wrote:
On 08/24/2012 05:35 AM, Man-wai Chang wrote:
I think the best defense is not to rely on a tool or design, but to
exercise your palms and the tunnel muscles periodically, and to
massage the tendons
Nothing can replace
On 08/24/2012 08:23 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account wrote:
On Fri, August 24, 2012 9:30 am, Jeff Johnson wrote:
Frank: I have been typing on a keyboard all of my adult life. During
the 90's I started to develop pain in my hands and wrists. It may have
been the beginnings of carpal
I'm with Matt because I just can't get comfortable when using an ergo keyboard.
Guess that I would adjust if it became a health issue tho.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Aug 24, 2012, at 9:52 AM, M Jarvis
On Aug 24, 2012, at 9:31 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
Because they are GUIDs - globally unique. That fact is very important in
some applications, but overkill for a lot of others.
When OpenStack was first created, it used auto-incremented keys to
identify resources such as servers, volumes,
On 8/24/12 2:18 AM, Paul Hill wrote:
Guids are nice but can add a significant size overhead to your database.
Yes, that is the one disadvantage I've identified, but storage is cheap. It
isn't as
if query performance necessarily goes down as the database grows in size.
Paul
On 8/24/12 10:17 AM, Ed Leafe wrote:
The worst part is that several of us argued for UUIDs from the start,
but lost that discussion to those who favored the simplicity of letting the
database handle key generation.
In my mind, keeping it simple means UUID.
Paul
On Aug 24, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
Guids are nice but can add a significant size overhead to your database.
Yes, that is the one disadvantage I've identified, but storage is cheap. It
isn't as
if query performance necessarily goes down as the database grows in size.
On 8/24/12 1:29 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
On Aug 24, 2012, at 3:24 PM, Paul McNett wrote:
Guids are nice but can add a significant size overhead to your database.
Yes, that is the one disadvantage I've identified, but storage is cheap. It
isn't as
if query performance necessarily goes down as
On Fri, August 24, 2012 4:11 pm, Peter Hart wrote:
I have an application which uses Arg Software Ribbon bars.
When I click on an icon to open a form which needs to open a table
exclusive i.e. for re-indexing. I get an error that the table is already
in use. I don't get this error if either
A private DataSession will close it's own use of a table. Are you sure
that the table wasn't already open before your private DS form ran? If the
tables were already open, the private DS will not close them, only its use
of the tables, essentially like a USE AGAIN.
Fred
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012
Don't waste time looking for the problem.
Just emit a SET Database TO and CLOSE TABLES ALL .
After that execute your routine.
E.
From: Peter Hart ph...@peterhartcomputers.co.uk
To: 'profox@leafe.com' profox@leafe.com
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2012 5:11 PM
Try AUSED() to find which tables are open.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-
boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Peter Hart
Sent: 24 August 2012 21:12
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Tables left open when
AUSED() only reports on the current session if a sessionid is not
specified. In any case, it only reports on a single session.
Fred
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 2:07 PM, John Weller j...@johnweller.co.uk wrote:
Try AUSED() to find which tables are open.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
Peter Hart ph...@peterhartcomputers.co.uk wrote:
I have an application which uses Arg Software Ribbon bars.
When I click on an icon to open a form which needs to open a table
exclusive i.e. for re-indexing. I get an error that the table is
already in use. I don't get this error if either this is
Over the years of my experience with Fox and VFP, I used all kinds of
ways to
generate primary keys, and in retrospect the best ever was
concatenating the machine
name with the output of sys(2015).
Wasn't it true at one time that SYS(2015) didn't guarantee uniqueness?
More like
On 8/24/12 5:21 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
That's why I concatenate with the machine name. I guess if you are really
paranoid
that a second instance of VFP could be running sys(2015) for the same
table in the
exact same timeslice as the first process you could also concatenate the
process id.
I was found to have carpel tunnel problems a decade ago with nerve
conduction tests. The doc told me of two kinds of surgery available,
one with a two week recovery, one with 48 hour recovery, but a higher
risk of permanent loss of feeling in the hands.
There's no guarantee you'll get the
On 8/24/12 5:21 PM, Ken Dibble wrote:
That's why I concatenate with the machine name. I guess if you are
really
paranoid
that a second instance of VFP could be running sys(2015) for the same
table in the
exact same timeslice as the first process you could also concatenate the
Is it possible to run through all used work areas to see if the tables
required are in use and if so close them?
You can use AUSED(), you may need to use SET DATASESSION also.
You can use ASESSIONS() to get an array of data session IDs, and then loop
through those, use AUSED() to get an
31 matches
Mail list logo
