fwiw Google tells me it is now deprecated by ms
Many years ago I used it in a webpage - for users who didn't have it
there was a way for them to download it ( tag?? - it's been a
looong time),
... but don't know whether that would work without admin privs or with a
locked-down browser profile.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Fred Taylor wrote:
> I didn't even notice that when I brought the page up. Also, isn't it
> http://vfpx.codeplex.com/ for the main page? (note the vfpx)
>
So, you're saying, if I navigate to the wrong page, I'm going to end
up on the wrong page?
*sheepish grim*
I didn't even notice that when I brought the page up. Also, isn't it
http://vfpx.codeplex.com/ for the main page? (note the vfpx)
Fred
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:37 PM, Ted Roche wrote:
> I got a really slow load (I'm on a very fast internet connection) and
> then a page titled "Saraff.Visual
I got a really slow load (I'm on a very fast internet connection) and
then a page titled "Saraff.VisualFoxpro.NET" which is not the normal
main page.
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> I'm just getting a blank page in Chrome. Anyone else seeing similar results?
>
> --
>
> r
Perhaps you'll need to determine the bounds and then add an assign method to
keep it from crossing the line? Doesn't feel very elegant, I know but...
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy
Pearson
Sent: Monday, February 27, 201
Fred Taylor wrote on 2017-02-27:
> Maybe the size of the font used in the header object is too large when
the
> size of the grid is 58 high?
>
> Fred
>
Fred,
I thought of that. Now I went a little further.
Sysmetric(8) && Height of Horizontal Scrollbar arrows is 60.
I don't see what is
We've issued the Call for Speakers (http://www.swfox.net/CallForSpeakers.pdf)
for Southwest Fox 2017 and Southwest
Xbase++ 2017. If you are interested in presenting at either conference, please
read the document and consider submitting
sessions via the Geek Gatherings Submission Web site
(https:
It seems that at normal 100% font size, the limit for Grid.Height is
minimum 20. So the 58 is less than 3.5 * 20 (70) ?
Fred
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Tracy Pearson
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have run in to an odd error.
>
> I have a common grid. It has been placed on a pageframe class. It
Maybe the size of the font used in the header object is too large when the
size of the grid is 58 high?
Fred
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Tracy Pearson
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have run in to an odd error.
>
> I have a common grid. It has been placed on a pageframe class. It is used
> only in
Hello,
I have run in to an odd error.
I have a common grid. It has been placed on a pageframe class. It is used
only in one form, multiple times on that form. The hierarchy: grid is on a
page of a pageframe, on a container, on a page of a pageframe, on a page of
a pageframe, on a form.
For some
Cleared all my codeplex cookies and the site comes up. But now if I try to sign
in using my Codeplex creds to leave a comment I get a site error. Will move on
for now. Thanks to all for taking a look.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Beh
Working here on Chrome, Firefox, Edge and IE even!!
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred Taylor
Sent: 27 February 2017 16:07
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Re: VFP Codeplex site down?
Their search doesn't seem to be working, though.,
Their search doesn't seem to be working, though., I get an "Oops" page.
Fred
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 9:05 AM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> And Fred. :-) Probably some cookie issue.
>
> --
>
> rk
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred
>
And Fred. :-) Probably some cookie issue.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fred Taylor
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 11:04 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP Codeplex site down?
Works with Chrome for me, too. http:/
Thanks, Tracy.
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Tracy
Pearson
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2017 10:53 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP Codeplex site down?
Nope. Works for me in chrome.
On February 27, 2017 10:42:16 A
Works with Chrome for me, too. http://vfp.codeplex.com/
Fred
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 8:42 AM, Richard Kaye wrote:
> I'm just getting a blank page in Chrome. Anyone else seeing similar
> results?
>
> --
>
> rk
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>
Nope. Works for me in chrome.
On February 27, 2017 10:42:16 AM EST, Richard Kaye wrote:
>I'm just getting a blank page in Chrome. Anyone else seeing similar
>results?
>
>--
>
>rk
>
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
_
I'm just getting a blank page in Chrome. Anyone else seeing similar results?
--
rk
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscri
Dne 27.2.2017 v 14:18 Dave Crozier napsal(a):
Gentlemen,
Just come across a really weird problem whilst installing some software on a
new machine. It uses MSCAL.OCX as an ActiveX component which on the majority of
machines is installed by default. However in this case it isn't and hence
requir
Isn't there a way to add the registry settings needed to the HKCU node?
Tracy
On February 27, 2017 8:25:45 AM EST, Alan Bourke
wrote:
>IIRC the only way you can have an OCX that doesn't require registration
>is if you include a manifest file with it. That OCX is part of MS
>Access, can you inst
IIRC the only way you can have an OCX that doesn't require registration
is if you include a manifest file with it. That OCX is part of MS
Access, can you install Office on the PC?
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages
Gentlemen,
Just come across a really weird problem whilst installing some software on a
new machine. It uses MSCAL.OCX as an ActiveX component which on the majority of
machines is installed by default. However in this case it isn't and hence
requires regsvr32 to register it - or (as I thought) s
22 matches
Mail list logo
