> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar
> got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would
> have NEVER been tolerated in a desktop app.
A lot of that was due to the previously mentioned mess that was and is
browser support. Things are a lot
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, at 07:53 AM, José Enrique Llopis wrote:
> Honestly I think it would be best not to use GMAIL but to use external
> SMTP
+1
If you're doing bulk emailing, use a service that's intended for bulk
emailing. Mailjet is $7.49 US a month for 30,000 emails with no
throttling involve
Kevin,
Does this help?
https://www.mssqltips.com/sqlservertip/3076/how-to-read-the-sql-server-database-transaction-log/
You may need a little work to get what you want but it seems like all the info
you want is in the log.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@ma
It's not the index that is the problem, it is how you structure the query based
on the index that really matters.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@mail.leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 06 June 2017 21:36
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Is there any
... the index should be designed based on what the query will be analysing not
the other way around.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: ProFox [mailto:profox-boun...@mail.leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan
Sent: 06 June 2017 21:36
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Is there any advantage f
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Gene Wirchenko wrote:
> At 21:28 2017-06-06, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
>> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would have
>> N
Yes, I was just wondering since it doesn't have to do the calculation every
time it updates
From: Dave Crozier
To: ProFox Email List
Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 8:05 AM
Subject: RE: Is there any advantage for indexing on balance rather than on
principle - payments +adjustments?
Early pricing ends June 30
https://conferences.oreilly.com/jupyter/jup-ny
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Analyst
Ring Container Technology
Oakland TN
901.246-0159 cell
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
---
Alan Bourke wrote on 2017-06-07:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017, at 07:53 AM, José Enrique Llopis wrote:
>
>> Honestly I think it would be best not to use GMAIL but to use external
>> SMTP
>>
> +1
>
> If you're doing bulk emailing, use a service that's intended for bulk
> emailing. Mailjet is $7.49
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Michael Madigan wrote:
> Yes, I was just wondering since it doesn't have to do the calculation every
> time it updates
>
But you have to do the calculation for the denormalized balance field
you're putting into the table, every time you update any records
principa
I think MailJet and Mandrill are offering similar services with a different
pricing structure. Let me see if I can get this math correct for a couple of
example scenarios.
If you were to send out 1,000 emails per month ...
... for MailJet at $7.49/mo * 12mo = $89.88/year
... for Mandrill at $20
Gene - FYI - I filter my emails simply by "profox" being within the email
address. If you had done it the same way - instead basing it on the Entire
email addy - then you would Not have had the problem that occurred on your end.
Just sayin'...
Regards,
Kurt Wendt
Senior Systems Analyst
Tel.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 8:24 AM, Ted Roche wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 9:04 AM, Michael Madigan
> wrote:
> > Yes, I was just wondering since it doesn't have to do the calculation
> every time it updates
> >
>
> But you have to do the calculation for the denormalized balance field
> you're put
Depending on your rights you can use Profile.exe and run it against the db
in question. There is an amazing amount of information it could present to
you and watching a quick Youtube on it will save you a lot of initial extra
data you don't want to see.
I would avoid logs as a first step in the w
Quick test...
-- Ed Leafe
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leaf
Works for me.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Edward Leafe wrote:
> Quick test...
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
>
>
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo
Slow answer...
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 11:45 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay
Works for me.
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Edward Leafe
On Jun 7, 2017, at 10:09 AM, Edward Leafe wrote:
>
> Quick test...
Ii was seeing how it counted emails. One post to ProFox resulted in almost 200
emails. With the average volume we have, that would end up costing over $3000 a
year! So I guess I need to find another SMTP relay service if we’re
On Jun 7, 2017, at 8:58 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote:
> Gene - FYI - I filter my emails simply by "profox" being within the email
> address. If you had done it the same way - instead basing it on the Entire
> email addy - then you would Not have had the problem that occurred on your
> end. Just sayin'
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
> I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar got
> set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would have NEVER
> been tolerated in a desktop app.
http://thedailywtf.com/
I bet that runs like the wind in a browser...
You think Whil used that in his User Hostile Interfaces presentation?
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Edward Leafe
Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 12:44 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
On Jun 7, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Edward Leafe wrote:
> Ii was seeing how it counted emails. One post to ProFox resulted in almost
> 200 emails. With the average volume we have, that would end up costing over
> $3000 a year! So I guess I need to find another SMTP relay service if we’re
> going to g
On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Edward Leafe wrote:
>
> Ok, now trying with relaying through gmail.
>
> -- Ed Leafe
>
Looks good, but I'm on gmail, so it may not have to travel as far.
--
Ted Roche
Ted Roche & Associates, LLC
http://www.tedroche.com
___
I got it OK and I'm not on gmail.
John Weller
01380 723235
07976 393631
> -Original Message-
> From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted
> Roche
> Sent: 07 June 2017 19:52
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay
>
> On Wed, J
On Jun 7, 2017, at 2:16 PM, John Weller wrote:
> I got it OK and I'm not on gmail.
Good to know!
I just re-enabled all accounts that were locked due to excessive bounces. I’m
hoping that this will now go through successfully to them.
-- Ed Leafe
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME
Hi Ed,
First one I have gotten in years. I don't know why it was bouncing -
maybe because Verizon sold their email services to AOL?
I get ProLinux, ProPython and DABOUsers normally. Go figure.
On 06/07/2017 04:00 PM, Edward Leafe wrote:
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 2:16 PM, John Weller wrote:
>
>> I g
Well, it came back so . . .
On 06/07/2017 05:44 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
> Hi Ed,
>
> First one I have gotten in years. I don't know why it was bouncing -
> maybe because Verizon sold their email services to AOL?
>
> I get ProLinux, ProPython and DABOUsers normally. Go figure.
>
>
> On 06/07/2017
On 2017-06-07 12:44, Edward Leafe wrote:
On Jun 6, 2017, at 11:28 PM,
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
I was surprised years ago (and somewhat still am) with how low the bar
got set on what was an acceptable UX on a website. Much of that would
have NEVER been tolerated in a
On 2017-06-07 09:44, Kevin J Cully wrote:
I think MailJet and Mandrill are offering similar services with a
different pricing structure. Let me see if I can get this math
correct for a couple of example scenarios.
If you were to send out 1,000 emails per month ...
... for MailJet at $7.49/mo *
> From the Mandril site, they may require a MailChimp plan of $25.00/month
for
> 1,501-2000 subscribers. I'm not sure what a "subscriber" is in this
scenario but it's
> definitely worth looking into before signing up.
I'm vaguely familiar with MailChimp as a service for shooting posts to a
mailin
On 2017-06-08 01:23, Jerry Wolper wrote:
I'm vaguely familiar with MailChimp as a service for shooting posts to
a
mailing list. So it works for breweries who want to send out
newsletters,
but I don't how it would be for sending out individual invoices or to
people who aren't signed up to receiv
31 matches
Mail list logo
