Re: [NF] Python: 2.x vs 3.x

2017-08-20 Thread Ed Leafe
On Aug 20, 2017, at 1:22 PM, Paul H. Tarver wrote: > > I wondered when we would get to Dabo. But I assumed after your comment that > 3.x Python was the future that Dabo might work with 3. > > How can I reconcile the two pieces of advice? Easy: Dabo depends on a library called

Re: [NF] Python: 2.x vs 3.x

2017-08-20 Thread mbsoftwaresolutions
On 2017-08-20 12:49, Paul H. Tarver wrote: Gotta say, right now it is all very confusing. From all the different frameworks and ide's and modules and platforms and licensing and versions I'm making myself crazy trying to figure out how to proceed. All I want to do is find a language and/or

Re: [NF] Python: 2.x vs 3.x

2017-08-20 Thread Paul H. Tarver
I wondered when we would get to Dabo. But I assumed after your comment that 3.x Python was the future that Dabo might work with 3. How can I reconcile the two pieces of advice? Paul Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 20, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >> On Aug 20, 2017,

Re: [NF] Python: 2.x vs 3.x

2017-08-20 Thread Ed Leafe
On Aug 20, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Paul H. Tarver wrote: > > All I want to do is find a language and/or platform to build windows desktop > (for now, web later) applications with strong easy database support and > distribute the applications commercially that doesn't cost an arm

Re: [NF] Python: 2.x vs 3.x

2017-08-20 Thread Paul H. Tarver
Gotta say, right now it is all very confusing. From all the different frameworks and ide's and modules and platforms and licensing and versions I'm making myself crazy trying to figure out how to proceed. All I want to do is find a language and/or platform to build windows desktop (for now,

Re: [NF] Python: 2.x vs 3.x

2017-08-20 Thread Ted Roche
On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 12:12 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > And if you need an additional nudge, support for Python 2.x will end in 2020 Sounds like it's time for a Y2K2X crash program! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com