Re: Remote FoxPro Work???

2019-07-04 Thread Kurt @ Gmail
Wow - you really must be a Fan! Will be honest - and it probably sounds bad - but, I never heard of A-frame. I have, of course, heard of Unity - and I have merely dabbled in it. But, most co's want SERIOUS Unity experience in order to hire. And, FYI - the current gig - which does NOT Pay enough

Re: Remote FoxPro Work???

2019-07-04 Thread Kurt @ Gmail
1st IDE - yes, that was exactly my point. For programming - it was TRULY a Game Changer!!! On 7/4/2019 1:10 AM, Alan Bourke wrote: Turbo Pascal and Turbo C were indeed great, used them a lot in college. Probably was the first IDE in the sense that we know them today. ___

Re: Remote FoxPro Work???

2019-07-04 Thread Johan Nel
On 2019/07/04 04:27, Kurt at VR-FX wrote: Mike - you got THAT Right! I used to LOVE Turbo Pascal! I was doing it back in college - when another student got a cracked copy of it - and it BLEW ME AWAY! I think it was the 1st True Dev Env - where you could code, compile, link, run - and then Back

Re: Remote FoxPro Work???

2019-07-04 Thread Paul Hemans
You also have 3d skills. Can you use them to segue into A-Frame, Unity or photorealism etc? On Wed, Jul 3, 2019 at 7:56 AM Kurt at VR-FX wrote: > Yeah - I know - these days - that's a pretty crazy request. > > I know some of you have followed me a bit - and know I lost my job in > Nov 2017 - whe

Re: AW: Super bizarre page.init bug on form.pageframe -- it never runs! (VFP9SP2)

2019-07-04 Thread Thierry Nivelet
Hi, Maybe this can help (from help > "Member Classes") "On an .scx form, if you add instantiation code to the member class's Init event, Visual FoxPro disregards that code and only the Init code for the member class definition runs. However, with visual class library (.vcx) forms, Visual FoxP

Re: AW: Super bizarre page.init bug on form.pageframe -- it never runs! (VFP9SP2)

2019-07-04 Thread Tracy Pearson
Have you looked at what class is actually instantiated? On July 4, 2019 7:53:52 AM EDT, "MB Software Solutions, LLC" wrote: >Hi wOOdy, > >The pageframe does have its MemberClass settings set here: >https://www.screencast.com/t/sFIpL8MLFeC > >I tried to (re-)define the SCX Properties field but V

Re: AW: Super bizarre page.init bug on form.pageframe -- it never runs! (VFP9SP2)

2019-07-04 Thread MB Software Solutions, LLC
Hi wOOdy, The pageframe does have its MemberClass settings set here: https://www.screencast.com/t/sFIpL8MLFeC I tried to (re-)define the SCX Properties field but VFP didn't like it for some reason. Here's the code from the Class Browser of my pagbase class, doing pretty much what you said:

Re: Remote FoxPro Work???

2019-07-04 Thread Alan Bourke
Turbo Pascal and Turbo C were indeed great, used them a lot in college. Probably was the first IDE in the sense that we know them today. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintena

AW: Super bizarre page.init bug on form.pageframe -- it never runs! (VFP9SP2)

2019-07-04 Thread juergen
As long as you have no MemberClass from a MemberClassLibrary defined in your pageframe, new pages are always plain stock standard pages from VFP's internal baseclass. I have a simple PRG for those nonvisual Memberclasses, which is basically just a DEFINE MyPage AS PAGE ENDDEFINE Save that as