Azyra Systems report that their large scale Enterprise System used by
100+ logistics businesses in 12 countries is now built with X# as the
principal language and Microsoft Sql Server as the database.
Jimmy Cahill, Joint CEO of Azyra, told us
/“We are delighted with the unrivalled coding effic
Azyra Systems report that their large scale Enterprise System used by
100+ logistics businesses in 12 countries is now built with X# as the
principal language and Microsoft Sql Server as the database.
Jimmy Cahill, Joint CEO of Azyra, told us
/“We are delighted with the unrivalled coding effic
Problem: need to preserve Customer's email signature in Outlook
automation code. Tech: VFP9SP2 app using the latest Outlook client.
This is an update to the 8/21/2019 thread I started about using Outlook
to create an email with file attachments. Got that code working (see
below) but now ne
Same. Code smell.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 10:19 AM MB Software Solutions, LLC <
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com> wrote:
> I would agree that it seems kludgey. Worked for a "genius" last gig and
> he used it and it was amazing to see it in action operate easily but my
> spidey sense sa
I would agree that it seems kludgey. Worked for a "genius" last gig and
he used it and it was amazing to see it in action operate easily but my
spidey sense said "yeah, no...I don't like it."
On 12/3/2019 11:10 AM, Jürgen Wondzinski wrote:
Sounds a little bit like "bad design", but if life de
Many thanks to everybody who has replied - I had come across the :: operator
many moons ago but had forgotten about it.
Paul Newton
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Jürgen Wondzinski
Sent: 03 December 2019 16:10
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: AW: Calling code in parent
Sounds a little bit like "bad design", but if life demands such
constructs
You can always get the code from the upmost level by using the "QuatroDot"
operator ::
like class::MyMethod()
If you would need one in between, then you need to do some clever IF
branching in the beginning of each le
Hmmm...See :: Scope Resolution Operator in VFP help. That references
calling the PARENT but not sure how you'd leapfrog back 2+ levels. I'm
sure the Foxperts here will answer shortly.
On 12/3/2019 11:00 AM, Paul Newton wrote:
Hi all
Let's say that I have the following situation:
GreatGrand
> Let's say that I have the following situation:
>
> GreatGrandParent -> GrandParent -> Parent -> Class
>
> In Class I want to bypass the code in Parent but call the code in either
> GrandParent OR GreatGrandParent.
GrandParent::Method ()
--
Christof
__
Hi all
Let's say that I have the following situation:
GreatGrandParent -> GrandParent -> Parent -> Class
In Class I want to bypass the code in Parent but call the code in either
GrandParent OR GreatGrandParent.
Is this possible and, if so, how? Many thanks
Paul Newton
--- StripMime Report
10 matches
Mail list logo