On 6/18/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There should be specialized judges for for computer
technology.
a friend of mine was screwed by a computer-retarded
judge.
Technically a judge shouldn't need to know the ins and outs of
technical aspects of a case - that's what the experts
I think judges should have some basic knowledge of what they are ruling
on so he can make an intelligent/reasonable ruling. This ruling, if I
understood correctly, hinges on the fact that TorrentSpy doesn't log
users. It would seem since they are being sued, and there is the issue
of discovery
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 03:31, Paul Hill wrote:
On 6/18/07, Michael Madigan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There should be specialized judges for for computer
technology.
a friend of mine was screwed by a computer-retarded
judge.
Technically a judge shouldn't need to know the ins and outs
I think judges should have some basic knowledge of what they are ruling
on so he can make an intelligent/reasonable ruling.
To paraphrase the May 19 2007 Economist. The legal system is in danger of
being overloaded by the problem of electronic discovery.
In the discovery process both parties
I know you meant it as a gratuitous dig at President Gore but...
I'm sure Al Gore could explain it to the judge.
Unlike the current resident, Gore actually knows something...
Of course, that's assuming that it could be explained to this judge at
all. Many (most?) judges don't have a broad
I would hope he knows something. Al Gore invented the
Internet.
--- Chet Gardiner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know you meant it as a gratuitous dig at President
Gore but...
I'm sure Al Gore could explain it to the judge.
Unlike the current resident, Gore actually knows
something...
On Tuesday 19 June 2007 13:51, Michael Madigan wrote:
I would hope he knows something. Al Gore invented the
Internet.
Hi Michael, Chet!
Certainly, in two years worth of excruciating detail!
President Gore? I must have really missed something! Or the Ds did.
--- Chet Gardiner [EMAIL
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6190900.html?tag=nl.e550
Essentially, this judge has held that the contents of a server's RAM
has to be preserved just like any other document.
This sounds almost as clueless as the internet is a bunch of tubes
moron.
-- Ed Leafe
--
of
conspiratorial thinking for a bit now...
Gil
p.s. - I likely would have used moron at first blush also, but you get my
drift g...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Monday, June 18, 2007 5:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [NF] You
There should be specialized judges for for computer
technology.
a friend of mine was screwed by a computer-retarded
judge.
--- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22-6190900.html?tag=nl.e550
Essentially, this judge has held that the contents
of a
, June 18, 2007 6:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] You RAM is a document?
There should be specialized judges for for computer
technology.
a friend of mine was screwed by a computer-retarded
judge.
--- Ed Leafe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9588_22
11 matches
Mail list logo