That would explain my ability to 'talk' then.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Nov 2, 2012, at 10:43 AM, Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> El 02/11/12 12:34, Michael Oke, II escribió:
>> He has no point, get used to it.
>
>
El 02/11/12 12:34, Michael Oke, II escribió:
He has no point, get used to it.
Hey! Kenyan boys are not allowed to speak here.
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free ve
ot;Ricardo Aráoz"
To: "ProFox Email List"
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
El 02/11/12 00:11, Nicholas Geti escribió:
Why do you keep bringing up Bush? We all know what happened. It has
been gone over and o
Except his pointy head
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Oke, II"
To: ProFox Email List
Cc:
Sent: Friday, November 2, 2012 11:34 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
He has no point, get used to it.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
C
om: "Ricardo Aráoz"
> To: "ProFox Email List"
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:08 AM
> Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
>
>
> El 02/11/12 00:11, Nicholas Geti escribió:
>> Why do you keep bringing up Bush? We all know
What is your point? I missed it.
Nick Geti
- Original Message -
From: "Ricardo Aráoz"
To: "ProFox Email List"
Sent: Friday, November 02, 2012 6:08 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
El 02/11/12 00:11, Nicholas Geti escri
El 02/11/12 00:21, Nicholas Geti escribió:
You really have the facts ass-backwards. Mitt never promised a chicken
in every pot. It was Obama who promised something similar: a stipend
to everyone who doesn't pay taxes. He now has promised to make
everyone harmed by Sandy in New York and New Jers
El 02/11/12 00:13, Nicholas Geti escribió:
I am afraid I can barely keep from upchucking on your reasoning so
I'll not respond to your drivel.
Nick Geti
We understand Nicky.
Wouldn't it help if you stopped chewing and start reading?
___
Post Messag
El 02/11/12 00:11, Nicholas Geti escribió:
Why do you keep bringing up Bush? We all know what happened. It has
been gone over and over until the subject has been beaten to death.
Obama had four years to get the economy moving again and he didn't do
it. It should have taken less than a year if h
On 11/02/2012 12:55 AM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 10:11 PM, Nicholas Geti wrote:
Why do you keep bringing up Bush? We all know what happened. It has
been gone over and over until the subject has been beaten to death.
I keep bring it up; because, people seem to have very short memories.
O
11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
A lot of the Obama Deficit was due to a couple of Bush era events:
1) The tax policies enacted during the Bush years to lower taxes,
especially on the wealthiest 2% of Americans, who really didn't need
the gif
dJ
Nick Geti
- Original Message - From: "lelandj"
To: "ProFox Email List"
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
On 11/01/2012 10:43 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:06 AM, lelandj wrote:
A lo
On 11/01/2012 11:45 PM, lelandj wrote:
Point out one lie that I have told.
I posted the fact check to the "deceitful allegation", didn't you read
it? Romney was right, the presidents were talking about the "old" Jeeps,
which will be going out of production and the jobs sunsetting.
Now abo
On 11/01/2012 10:12 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:02 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:37 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:55 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 06:33 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 02:40 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
I live in this one. You might want to listen to actual reports of what occurred
and not Barry's campaign.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 6:52 PM, lelandj wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 06:18 PM, Michael
ot;ProFox Email List"
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:53 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
On 11/01/2012 10:43 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:06 AM, lelandj wrote:
A lot of the Obama Deficit was due to a couple of Bush era events:
1)
: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
How did they do that when the democrats controlled both the house and the
senate? Sounds like horseshit to me.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages ar
I am afraid I can barely keep from upchucking on your reasoning so I'll not
respond to your drivel.
Nick Geti
- Original Message -
From: "lelandj"
To: "ProFox Email List"
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:32 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion,
nment messing around in the economy. Do I need
to explain that to you?
Nick Geti
- Original Message -
From: "lelandj"
To: "ProFox Email List"
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2012 11:06 AM
Subject: Re: [OT] 8 years Bush $4 trillion, 4 years Obama $5 trillion
A lot
On 11/01/2012 11:02 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:37 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:55 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 06:33 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 02:40 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM, lelandj wrote:
Pl
On 11/01/2012 09:37 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 09:55 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 06:33 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 02:40 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM, lelandj wrote:
Please post a link to the video of that, I
On 11/01/2012 09:55 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 06:33 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 02:40 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM, lelandj wrote:
Please post a link to the video of that, I seem to have missed it :-)
So he didn't a
On 11/01/2012 06:33 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 02:40 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM, lelandj wrote:
Please post a link to the video of that, I seem to have missed it :-)
Hi Leland,
So he didn't actually say that, or to put i
On 11/01/2012 06:18 PM, Michael Oke wrote:
Mitt never claimed such a thing and Obama didn't do it.
In what parallel universe are you from. LOL
Regards,
LelandJ
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Nov 1, 2012, at
On 11/01/2012 02:40 PM, lelandj wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM, lelandj wrote:
Please post a link to the video of that, I seem to have missed it :-)
Hi Leland,
So he didn't actually say that, or to put it another way, you lied.
It was more playfu
Mitt never claimed such a thing and Obama didn't do it.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 12:49 PM, lelandj wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 02:34 PM, Michael Oke wrote:
>> That would make snl as accurate as
On 11/01/2012 02:34 PM, Michael Oke wrote:
That would make snl as accurate as Obama claiming that he did it.
What???
Regards
LelandJ
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:40 AM, lelandj wrote:
That would make snl as accurate as Obama claiming that he did it.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 11:40 AM, lelandj wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
>> On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM,
On 11/01/2012 01:03 PM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM, lelandj wrote:
Please post a link to the video of that, I seem to have missed it :-)
Hi Leland,
So he didn't actually say that, or to put it another way, you lied.
It was more playful satire than a lie for illustrative pr
On 11/01/2012 01:31 PM, lelandj wrote:
Please post a link to the video of that, I seem to have missed it :-)
Hi Leland,
So he didn't actually say that, or to put it another way, you lied.
I was illustrating how campaign promises are subject to fate. It was the
Republican Party that made the
On 11/01/2012 11:03 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:53 AM, lelandj wrote:
Hi Leland,
I told you you needed drugs, and you just drank more Kool-aid.
Obama's promise was specific - he said he would cut the deficit, and
he hasn't. Not only that, the "stimulus" also went to people who
di
On 11/01/2012 11:53 AM, lelandj wrote:
Hi Leland,
I told you you needed drugs, and you just drank more Kool-aid.
Obama's promise was specific - he said he would cut the deficit, and
he hasn't. Not only that, the "stimulus" also went to people who
didn't really need it - who invested in China w
On 11/01/2012 10:44 AM, Michael Oke wrote:
How did they do that when the democrats controlled both the house and the
senate? Sounds like horseshit to me.
#---
Notable Quote:
Microsoft Mandatory Survey (#3)
Customers who want to upgrade to Windows 98 Second Edition must now
On 11/01/2012 10:43 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
On 11/01/2012 11:06 AM, lelandj wrote:
A lot of the Obama Deficit was due to a couple of Bush era events:
1) The tax policies enacted during the Bush years to lower taxes,
especially on the wealthiest 2% of Americans, who really didn't need the
gift:
On 11/01/2012 11:32 AM, lelandj wrote:
There is one other factor of the Obama deficit that I must lay at the
feet of the Tea Party, (eg the extreme right wing of the Republican
Party).
You have the D talking points memorised. But they are all lies.
The Tea Party, to whom both Speaker John Boe
How did they do that when the democrats controlled both the house and the
senate? Sounds like horseshit to me.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 8:32 AM, lelandj wrote:
> There is one other factor
On 11/01/2012 11:06 AM, lelandj wrote:
A lot of the Obama Deficit was due to a couple of Bush era events:
1) The tax policies enacted during the Bush years to lower taxes,
especially on the wealthiest 2% of Americans, who really didn't need the
gift: The tax cuts to the wealthiest 2% of Americ
There is one other factor of the Obama deficit that I must lay at the
feet of the Tea Party, (eg the extreme right wing of the Republican
Party). The Tea Party, to whom both Speaker John Boehner and Mitt
Romney have bowed, were hell bent on making President Obama a one term
President, and to t
A lot of the Obama Deficit was due to a couple of Bush era events:
1) The tax policies enacted during the Bush years to lower taxes,
especially on the wealthiest 2% of Americans, who really didn't need the
gift: The tax cuts to the wealthiest 2% of Americans did little, if
anything, to stimu
Step away from the kool-aid Leland.
Michael Oke, II
661-349-6221
Contents of this and all messages are intended for their designated recipient.
On Nov 1, 2012, at 7:28 AM, lelandj wrote:
> On 11/01/2012 03:54 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
>> Hi Everybody,
>>
>> Video of Obama promising to cut th
On 11/01/2012 03:54 AM, Pete Theisen wrote:
Hi Everybody,
Video of Obama promising to cut the Bush deficit in half in his first
term. We know what he did instead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=gsa4uLmTw0M
More content in it as well.
8 years of Bush resulted in the greatest USA economic c
Hi Everybody,
Video of Obama promising to cut the Bush deficit in half in his first
term. We know what he did instead.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=gsa4uLmTw0M
More content in it as well.
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
___
42 matches
Mail list logo
