Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Perhaps worms are a normal part of your diet but save when I am on a
> survival trip, I have no need to include them in mine.
Chick chick chick chicken!
LMAO
> I think that you might be confused, still. It appears that you struggle
> with being human, never mind attem
Perhaps worms are a normal part of your diet but save when I am on a
survival trip, I have no need to include them in mine.
I think that you might be confused, still. It appears that you struggle
with being human, never mind attempting to label yourself politically.
Not that I'm sure what the
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>> You can call me all the names that you wish, it hardly makes you
>>> correct. Actually, it goes a long way to demonstrating the lack of
>>> intelligence that you possess.
>> Chick chick chick chicken!
>>
> Pitifully predictable.
Hey! There's a w
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>>
>> You can call me all the names that you wish, it hardly makes you
>> correct. Actually, it goes a long way to demonstrating the lack of
>> intelligence that you possess.
>
> Chick chick chick chicken!
>
Pitifully predictable.
>> You have no idea if it passed a reaso
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> So let's see, if right now your country issues laws to put Jews in
>> concentration camps (or maybe people of Japanese origin in concen
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> So let's see, if right now your country issues laws to put Jews in
> concentration camps (or maybe people of Japanese origin in concentration
> camps). Would yo
Michael Oke, II wrote:
>
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
So let's see, if right now your country issues laws to put Jews in
concentration camps (or maybe people of Japanese origin in concentration
camps). Would you in this place and time a
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>> So let's see, if right now your country issues laws to put Jews in
>>> concentration camps (or maybe people of Japanese origin in concentration
>>> camps). Would you in this place and time abide by them and help the
>>>
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> So let's see, if right now your country issues laws to put Jews in
>> concentration camps (or maybe people of Japanese origin in concentration
>> camps). Would you in this place and time abide by them and help the
>> police enforce them as any goo
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> So bottom line is you were *not* communicating properly, and my
> inadequate understanding of the English language gets blamed?
>
Incorrect, again. I was
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
So bottom line is you were *not* communicating properly, and my
inadequate understanding of the English language gets blamed?
>>> Incorrect, again. I was communicating properly and just
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>> So bottom line is you were *not* communicating properly, and my
>>> inadequate understanding of the English language gets blamed?
>>>
>> Incorrect, again. I was communicating properly and just dropped a
>> single word tha
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> So bottom line is you were *not* communicating properly, and my
>> inadequate understanding of the English language gets blamed?
>>
> Incorrect, again. I was communicating properly and just dropped a
> single word that, while relevant, did not tur
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in
1933? Yes that about sums up the logic that you have demonstrated time
and time again on this list. In other
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
>> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>>> An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in
>>> 1933? Yes that about sums up the logic that you have demonstrated time
>>> and time again on this list. In other words, very twisted.
>> Maybe
Ricardo Aráoz wrote:
> Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in
>> 1933? Yes that about sums up the logic that you have demonstrated time
>> and time again on this list. In other words, very twisted.
>
> Maybe I'm not proficient in the
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in
> 1933? Yes that about sums up the logic that you have demonstrated time
> and time again on this list. In other words, very twisted.
Maybe I'm not proficient in the English language? What does th
An attempt to one person's asylum request and violations with Germany in
1933? Yes that about sums up the logic that you have demonstrated time
and time again on this list. In other words, very twisted.
Nobody is saying that I should be consulted about which laws should and
should not be foll
Michael Oke, II wrote:
> And you are surprised by this? Defiance of a legal order gets you
> permission to stay, nice precedence to set.
You mean legal as in 1933 Germany when the law said Jews where to be
rounded up? Because it was a legal order, sanctioned according to the
laws of the land.
Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
>> And you are surprised by this? Defiance of a legal order gets you
>> permission to stay, nice precedence to set.
> Somehow is is better for USA security.
>
> "has said that if Onyango were forced to return to Ke
I don't have the answer ergo why I ask the question. I would think
that her failure to comply with the original ruling would
automatically eliminate her from future consideration. She stayed,
illegally, in this country and had every intention of continuing to do
so until outed by the Times of the
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
> So what was the basis of her claim in 2002, that was denied in 2004?
> Obama claims no knowledge of her at that point and time so it can hardly
> be the relationship that she had with him. or can it?
>
> Regardless, her request was denied,
So what was the basis of her claim in 2002, that was denied in 2004?
Obama claims no knowledge of her at that point and time so it can hardly
be the relationship that she had with him. or can it?
Regardless, her request was denied, why did she not leave?
::michael
Stephen Russell wrote:
> On
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 4:38 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
> "Onyango applied for asylum in 2002. She was rejected in 2004 and
> ordered to leave the country, but she continued to fight the order and
> stayed here illegally."
>
> If she had left when originally ordered to, perhaps she could have
> le
"Onyango applied for asylum in 2002. She was rejected in 2004 and
ordered to leave the country, but she continued to fight the order and
stayed here illegally."
If she had left when originally ordered to, perhaps she could have
legally attempted to return. Keep in mind that Obama was a relativ
I wonder if they'll grant Obama asylum?
--- On Wed, 5/19/10, Stephen Russell wrote:
> From: Stephen Russell
> Subject: Re: [OT] Obama aunt wins asylum
> To: "ProFox Email List"
> Date: Wednesday, May 19, 2010, 4:58 PM
> On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:14 PM,
> Mich
On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 3:14 PM, Michael Oke, II wrote:
> And you are surprised by this? Defiance of a legal order gets you
> permission to stay, nice precedence to set.
Somehow is is better for USA security.
"has said that if Onyango were forced to return to Kenya, she would
f
And you are surprised by this? Defiance of a legal order gets you
permission to stay, nice precedence to set.
::michael
Pete Theisen wrote:
> Hi Everybody,
>
> http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20100518/ARTICLE/5181045/-1/todayspaper?Title=President-s-aunt-wins-asylum-in-U-S-
_
Hi Everybody,
http://www.heraldtribune.com/article/20100518/ARTICLE/5181045/-1/todayspaper?Title=President-s-aunt-wins-asylum-in-U-S-
--
Regards,
Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/
http://elect-pete-theisen.com/
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subsc
29 matches
Mail list logo
