On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:13:43 -0600, Stephen Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A good comparison of what the EF is to be and what Linq already is.
If only there were an easy-to-use ORM for .Net that really worked well
with OLE DB data sources like VFP. They're all centered round SQL
Server,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:13:43 -0600, Stephen Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A good comparison of what the EF is to be and what Linq already is.
If only there were an easy-to-use ORM for .Net that really worked well
with
On Thu, 6 Nov 2008 05:37:54 -0600, Stephen Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Have you thought of making the mapper yourself?
I thought about doing one for nHibernate (or was it Wilson OR?) but
who's got the time :)
--
Alan Bourke
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stephen Russell wrote:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 16:13:43 -0600, Stephen Russell
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
A good comparison of what the EF is to be and what Linq already is.
If only there were an easy-to-use ORM for .Net that
On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:27 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account
wrote:
Tell me again why they couldn't make it easy to link the datasets to
the
objects like Foxpro made it easy??
Because they didn't want to make it look like Dabo? ;-)
-- Ed Leafe
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Nov 6, 2008, at 11:27 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account
wrote:
Tell me again why they couldn't make it easy to link the datasets to
the
objects like Foxpro made it easy??
Because they didn't want to make it look like Dabo? ;-)
LOL!
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:27 AM, MB Software Solutions General Account
Tell me again why they couldn't make it easy to link the datasets to the
objects like Foxpro made it easy??
--
Datasets were the first attempt in .Net 1.3,
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Stephen Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Tracy Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attended a .NET meeting in Asheville, NC last month.
Developer Centric Features of SQL Server 2008 by Kevin Boles who is an
independent SQL
Im just getting a handle on .NET and started looking at LINQ. didnt
like it so glad I can ignore it. Then again I looked at EF. Dont
understand it so that doesnt sound like an advantage either.
At 08:27 PM 4/11/2008, you wrote:
In terms of take-up, Linq is still a minnow - it's no COM or OLEDB.
In terms of take-up, Linq is still a minnow - it's no COM or OLEDB. In
that sense deprecating it has less of an impact even though it's
exasperating to have to evaluate a whole new ball of wax in the Entity
Framework. They need to rein themselves in and get a bit of focus
instead of trying to
, 2008 11:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] LINQ - RIP?
Im just getting a handle on .NET and started looking at LINQ. didnt
like it so glad I can ignore it. Then again I looked at EF. Dont
understand it so that doesnt sound like an advantage either.
At 08:27 PM 4/11/2008, you wrote
I attended a .NET meeting in Asheville, NC last month.
Developer Centric Features of SQL Server 2008 by Kevin Boles who is an
independent SQL Consultant and SQL Server expert as well as a SQL MVP.
It's focus was mainly on SQL. One of the big points Kevin gave was using
LINQ against Stored
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 6:14 AM, Tracy Pearson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I attended a .NET meeting in Asheville, NC last month.
Developer Centric Features of SQL Server 2008 by Kevin Boles who is an
independent SQL Consultant and SQL Server expert as well as a SQL MVP.
It's focus was mainly on
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Makes you wonder sometimes if Microsoft technology is worth following. As
soon as you get used to it or find it even its dead.
Bloody stupid
Evolution is good, although you might not think so if your name were T. Rex.
Change is
Makes you wonder sometimes if Microsoft technology is worth following. As
soon as you get used to it or find it even its dead.
Bloody stupid
Al
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Richard Kaye
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 1:44 PM
To:
On Nov 3, 2008, at 7:02 AM, Allen wrote:
Makes you wonder sometimes if Microsoft technology is worth
following. As
soon as you get used to it or find it even its dead.
Bloody stupid
Ah, but *this* time it will be different!
rof,lmao!
-- Ed Leafe
Allen wrote:
Makes you wonder sometimes if Microsoft technology is worth following. As
soon as you get used to it or find it even its dead.
Bloody stupid
Al
Certainly an argument could easily be made for this---Windows DNA comes
to mind.
When I read Richard's email, I had to laugh as I
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 11:19 AM, MB Software Solutions, LLC
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Allen wrote:
Makes you wonder sometimes if Microsoft technology is worth following. As
soon as you get used to it or find it even its dead.
Bloody stupid
Al
Certainly an argument could easily be made for
One old one that comes to mind is network dde. I had that working a treat.
Then it went and nothing was easy :)
Al
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of MB Software Solutions,LLC
Allen wrote:
Makes you wonder sometimes if Microsoft technology
So it's a new version of linq then. Not a new thing and byebye linq ?
Al
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Stephen Russell
Sent: Monday, November 03, 2008 6:41 PM
---
My co workers who went to PDC last week
Ted Roche wrote:
Evolution is good, although you might not think so if your name were T. Rex.
Change is good if it progresses in the right direction, but change for
change sake (this year , with tailfins!) is just bilking the
customer without delivering real value.
It's not bad that
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:18 PM, Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it's a new version of linq then. Not a new thing and byebye linq ?
From my understanding from those who actually read TFA and care, LINQ
for SQL is like to be discouraged and then discontinued in favor of
the Entity Framework.
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So it's a new version of linq then. Not a new thing and byebye linq ?
--
Linq is really 3 different products. Objects, XML and SQL would be
their names, and the direction of what the query
23 matches
Mail list logo
