half
>Of Alan Bourke
>Sent: 23 March 2007 13:04
>To: profox@leafe.com
>Subject: Re: VFP 8 and Server 2003 64 BIT
>
>When running 16-bit applications under 32-bit Terminal Services, each
>session will take up whatever the MEMLIMIT is, since they are all
>running in seperate
Alan,
Good point, but with 64 you will probably have a sh*t load of memory anyway!
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Alan Bourke
Sent: 23 March 2007 13:04
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP 8 and Server 2003 64 BIT
When
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Philip B
Sent: 23 March 2007 12:59
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP 8 and Server 2003 64 BIT
Hey Dave,
No need for an appology for good humour... :)
I was shot this question yesterday by a supervisor and they had to get
an answer off to a cust
When running 16-bit applications under 32-bit Terminal Services, each
session will take up whatever the MEMLIMIT is, since they are all
running in seperate instances of the 16-bit virtual machine. So for 20
people to do this, you need 20 x 16MB or whatever just for their apps. I
presume the sam
Hey Dave,
No need for an appology for good humour... :)
I was shot this question yesterday by a supervisor and they had to get
an answer off to a customer.
Thanks for the feedback here.
Our customer does use Terminal Services and that's how we dial in to
service them...
We would then have to run
EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Philip B
Sent: 22 March 2007 17:32
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP 8 and Server 2003 64 BIT
Thanks Alan,
It is just going to reside on the server.
Client Windows XP stations will be running the EXE on the workstations
with a DBF data.
So, my guess is it should ha
Thanks Alan,
It is just going to reside on the server.
Client Windows XP stations will be running the EXE on the workstations
with a DBF data.
So, my guess is it should have no negative affect on the Application.
The authors of the program are just saying it's not certified for a 64
bit server...
Philip B wrote:
> Hey all,
> Are there any negative issues with running VFP 8 apps on a Server 2003
> 64 Bit system?
> Any benefits?
>
When you say 'running' do you mean that the app is just in a folder on
the server and clients running 32-bit Windows run the EXE from a share?
In this case it
Philip,
More than 4 Gig of Memory available oh
Dave Crozier
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Philip B
Sent: 22 March 2007 16:50
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: VFP 8 and Server 2003 64 BIT
Hey all,
Are there any negative issues with
9 matches
Mail list logo
