Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

CONTACT :) On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 2:52 AM Ed Leafe wrote: > > > I’m testing out a new relay service, Mailgun (https://www.mailgun.com/). So > far it seems to be running well, but if any of you on the receiving end of > things notices a problem, please let me know. > -- .~. Might, Courag

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

+1 -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Koen Piller Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2019 5:23 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay Test successfull Op za 12 jan. 2019 om 23:05 schreef roger tremblay >

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

Test successfull Op za 12 jan. 2019 om 23:05 schreef roger tremblay > got it > > On 1/10/2019 5:39 AM, Jerry Wolper wrote: > >> If someone can confirm that they can see this email it will help me in > confirming I am not going mad and that I am sending correctly. > > You're sending correctly. >

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

got it On 1/10/2019 5:39 AM, Jerry Wolper wrote: If someone can confirm that they can see this email it will help me in confirming I am not going mad and that I am sending correctly. You're sending correctly. -Jerry [excessive quoting removed by server]

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

the goods in the ordinary course of its business. Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time -Original Message- From: ProFox On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: 10 January 2019 14:24 To: ProFox Mailing List Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testin

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

> If someone can confirm that they can see this email it will help me in > confirming I am not going mad and that I am sending correctly. You're sending correctly. -Jerry ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.lea

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On Jan 9, 2019, at 12:51 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > I’m testing out a new relay service, Mailgun (https://www.mailgun.com/). So > far it seems to be running well, but if any of you on the receiving end of > things notices a problem, please let me know. > > One other issue is the cost: it’s free i

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

nd bailee and keep the goods > > separate from those of the buyer and third parties and properly stored > > protected and insured and identified as the seller's property but shall > be > > entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its > business. > >

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

gt; entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its business. > Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer the seller > shall be entitled at any time > -Original Message- > From: ProFox On Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: 10 January 2019 14:24

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

separate from those of the buyer and third parties and properly stored > protected and insured and identified as the seller's property but shall be > entitled to resell or use the goods in the ordinary course of its business. > Until such time as the property in the goods passes t

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

iness. Until such time as the property in the goods passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time -Original Message- From: ProFox On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: 10 January 2019 14:24 To: ProFox Mailing List Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay On Jan 10, 2019, at 4:23 AM

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On Jan 10, 2019, at 4:23 AM, Dave Crozier wrote: > > I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart from my > own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please as it > seems to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my emails > as davec

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

ods passes to the buyer the seller shall be entitled at any time -Original Message- From: ProFox On Behalf Of mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com Sent: 09 January 2019 21:07 To: ProFox Email List Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay On 2019-01-09 16:02, Ed Leafe wrote: &

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay Ed, I have all the emails and seem to be able to receive everything apart from my own emails and responses, any chance you can give it a look please as it seems to be since we moved over to Office 365. I used to send all my emails as davec at

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

Hi Dave, Message received. I am using Office 365 as a personal account and am seeing my posts. John John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Dave Crozier Sent: 10 January 2019 10:24 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Testing

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

iginal Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Fernando D. Bozzo Sent: 09 January 2019 18:58 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay Test PASSED! - Green light :D El mié., 9 ene. 2019 a las 19:52, Ed Leafe () escribió: > Many of you have had problems receivin

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay Well, if ever needed, do a GoFundMe (or better site) campaign and we'll all chip in. I know I'd have no problem throwing a few bucks at this as a "thank you" for such a great resource. [excessive

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

+1. I'd chip in too! Paul H. Tarver Email: p...@tpcqpc.com -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2019 3:07 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

+1 John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 Well, if ever needed, do a GoFundMe (or better site) campaign and we'll all chip in. I know I'd have no problem throwing a few bucks at this as a "thank you" for such a great resource. ___ Post Messages t

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

I assume you have checked out Google Groups And thank you for the many years of yeomanship *Shai / שי **Charles Hart Enzer, MD(Ohio, USA), FAACAP* *Aliyah : Cincinnati to Jerusalem 's German Colony

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On 2019-01-09 16:02, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jan 9, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Kurt @ Gmail wrote: Ed - I really do NOT think you should use this service - since its Pricey - and there's NO Reason why you should pay for the service when these forums don't even Net you ANY $$$! Most months were below the

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On Jan 9, 2019, at 3:02 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > > around 210 messages / month OK, before anyone starts quibbling over this: I meant 210 *postings* per month, which, sent to 475 subscribers, makes 99,750 total email messages sent: just below the 100K threshold. -- Ed Leafe

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On Jan 9, 2019, at 2:54 PM, Kurt @ Gmail wrote: > > Ed - I really do NOT think you should use this service - since its Pricey - > and there's NO Reason why you should pay for the service when these forums > don't even Net you ANY $$$! Most months were below the level that the service would be

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

Too late - I already replied back to your last response! But - i know what happened - you read things in order - and replied immediately instead of seeing the other replies to the thread... -K- On 1/9/2019 12:58 PM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: On 2019-01-09 14:13, Ed Le

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On 2019-01-09 14:13, Ed Leafe wrote: On Jan 9, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: The numbers do not make sense. Does that "100K" mean 100,000 messages or 100 kilobytes? How does 280 relate to 133,000? It’s a monthly limit on the number of messages. And as Ted pointed out, each

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

Mike - yeah, both Ed & Ted already answered that Q. Issue is - its the monthly emails Times the total # of subscribers - which equates to the large 133K # total! Ed - I really do NOT think you should use this service - since its Pricey - and there's NO Reason why you should pay for the servic

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On 2019-01-09 13:51, Ed Leafe wrote: Many of you have had problems receiving mail from the list, as my domain is hosted on a server in the cloud, and many ISPs have blanket blocks on any IP addresses from cloud providers like mine (Digital Ocean). I’m testing out a new relay service, Mailgun (ht

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On Jan 9, 2019, at 12:58 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > > The numbers do not make sense. Does that "100K" mean 100,000 messages or > 100 kilobytes? How does 280 relate to 133,000? It’s a monthly limit on the number of messages. And as Ted pointed out, each post gets sent to each subscriber:

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019 at 1:58 PM Gene Wirchenko wrote: > How does 280 relate to 133,000? > 133,000 is EXACTLY 475 times 280, so it is possible that there are 475 subscribers receiving 280 messages. --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body --

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

Test PASSED! - Green light :D El mié., 9 ene. 2019 a las 19:52, Ed Leafe () escribió: > Many of you have had problems receiving mail from the list, as my domain > is hosted on a server in the cloud, and many ISPs have blanket blocks on > any IP addresses from cloud providers like mine (Digital

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new mail relay

At 10:51 2019-01-09, Ed Leafe wrote: Many of you have had problems receiving mail from the list, as my domain is hosted on a server in the cloud, and many ISPs have blanket blocks on any IP addresses from cloud providers like mine (Digital Ocean). I’m testing out a new relay service, Mailg

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:37 AM, wrote: > I've sent 2 emails in the past week that never showed up (and aren't in the > archives). Testing to see if this gets through. > No, sorry Mike, still nothing ;) Have a good weekend! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

On 2018-05-18 13:14, Ed Leafe wrote: On May 18, 2018, at 7:37 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: I've sent 2 emails in the past week that never showed up (and aren't in the archives). Testing to see if this gets through. Nothing in the spam filter, so I'm not sure why th

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

Yes On May 18, 2018 8:37 AM, wrote: > I've sent 2 emails in the past week that never showed up (and aren't in > the archives). Testing to see if this gets through. > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscri

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

On May 18, 2018, at 7:37 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: > I've sent 2 emails in the past week that never showed up (and aren't in the > archives). Testing to see if this gets through. Nothing in the spam filter, so I'm not sure why they didn't get through. -- Ed Leafe

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

On 05/18/18 9:25 AM, Ted Roche wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote: PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPlBpbmchPC9kaXY+ Understood, comrade. "The frog in the pond utters an azure cry." --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/anti

RE: String help (was Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox)

rs, "") RETURN leRetVal Stupid stuff I know, but a nice quick mental exercise! Thanks, Frank! Paul H. Tarver -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Frank Cazabon Sent: Friday, May 18, 2018 8:01 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

Ha ha Ted - funny! What I actually wrote was... Ping On 5/18/2018 9:25 AM, Ted Roche wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote: PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPlBpbmchPC9kaXY+ What Kurt said. Happy Friday! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:55 AM, Kurt Wendt wrote: > PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPlBpbmchPC9kaXY+ > What Kurt said. Happy Friday! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance:

Re: String help (was Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox)

On 2018-05-18 09:00, Frank Cazabon wrote: m.x="123-456-7890" CHRTRAN(m.x, "0123456789-", "") will leave any invalid characters behind Frank. Thanks, Frank! ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/ma

Re: String help (was Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox)

m.x="123-456-7890" CHRTRAN(m.x, "0123456789-", "") will leave any invalid characters behind Frank. Frank Cazabon On 18/05/2018 08:52 AM, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: On 2018-05-18 08:37, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Well, other post still not maki

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

PGRpdiBkaXI9J2F1dG8nPlBpbmchPC9kaXY+ --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- text/html (html body -- converted) --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version

String help (was Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox)

On 2018-05-18 08:37, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: Well, other post still not making it, so I'll add the simple request here since this went through: FieldValue1 = '123-456-7890' I want to scan for records where the field contains something OTHER than digits 0-9 and a d

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

Message received via Gmail. On Fri, May 18, 2018 at 8:37 PM, wrote: > I've sent 2 emails in the past week that never showed up (and aren't in the > archives). Testing to see if this gets through. -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin /( _ )\ http://sit

Re: [ADMIN] Testing post to ProFox

On 2018-05-18 08:37, mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote: I've sent 2 emails in the past week that never showed up (and aren't in the archives). Testing to see if this gets through. Winner ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscr

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

CONTACT Got this one On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 3:30 AM, Ken Dibble wrote: > Not receiving my own posts? -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you!

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Because Gmail by default treat ProFox email as spam, I am using what Ted once wrote, about adding ProFox to the contacts list, and from then I have no more ProFox emails in Spam. Another option in Gmail is creating a filter and checking "Never mark this as spam". I have many lists like this. 2

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Well gMail always blocks them - I just set Thunderbird to copy them to my inbox On 28-Mar-2018 1:00 AM, Ken Dibble wrote: Not receiving my own posts? [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Mainten

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On Mar 27, 2018, at 6:36 PM, Gene Wirchenko wrote: > >> So, Ed, please take a look and see what happened to my messages. > > Ed, I am having similar problems. I E-mailed you twice about this, and I > have not received a reply. What is going on? I got emails from you a few months ago. I r

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Yes, it was marked as spam. I’ll send the first and delete the dupes. Thanks very much, Ed. Ken ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http:/

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

At 13:05 2018-03-27, Ken Dibble wrote: [snip] Somebody will probably say "email is not guaranteed to be instantaneous, yadda yadda, who knows what could be wrong with all the newfangled filtering, yadda yadda, it's probably at your end, yadda yadda... I've been subscribed to ProFox since I

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

At 03:30 PM 3/27/2018, you wrote: Not receiving my own posts? The message to which I am replying was sent out at 3:30 pm EDT March 27 2018. It's in the ProFox archive. I received it almost immediately. Others have seen it and replied. I sent a message at 2:21 pm EDT March 27 2018 with subje

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On Mar 27, 2018, at 3:20 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: > > Ed, if you see any of my messages, please see if my original one is stuck in > the filter. Yes, it was marked as spam. I’ll send the first and delete the dupes. -- Ed Leafe ___ Post Messages t

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On Mar 27, 2018, at 2:56 PM, Tracy Pearson wrote: > It's a setting of the list-serve. If I remember right, it's off by default. The default for lists on my server is to get a copy of your own posts. You can change that if you wish. -- Ed Leafe

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

No, it's some peculiarity in my text and/or subject line that some filter's RegEx code did not anticipate, I'm sure. Around Christmas I sent a long email to my brother with about 20 links to Christmas songs on YouTube pages, interspersed with commentary. His email server kept rejecting the mes

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

More importantly, who are "THEY"? Paul -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:07 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Ken Dibble wr

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

At 03:30 PM 3/27/2018, you wrote: Not receiving my own posts? I don't think it likes my subject line. I'll try resending with a different subject. ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/list

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

I, otoh, am seeing my posts, so it's probably not a global change in maillist behavior. On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Ted Roche wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: >> Not receiving my own posts? >> > > Well, you already know what they say, right? > > > -- > Ted Roche >

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On Tue, Mar 27, 2018 at 3:30 PM, Ken Dibble wrote: > Not receiving my own posts? > Well, you already know what they say, right? -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Main

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

I always receive my own posts from ProFox. I may have set it years ago but certainly have not changed the setting since then. It's a setting of the list-serve. If I remember right, it's off by default. -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

It's a setting of the list-serve. If I remember right, it's off by default. -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ken Dibble Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:31 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: [ADMIN] Testing Not receiving my own posts?

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

Got it! Paul -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ken Dibble Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 2:31 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: [ADMIN] Testing Not receiving my own posts? [excessive quoting removed by server] __

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

Some of us are. -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech On Behalf Of Ken Dibble Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2018 3:31 PM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: [ADMIN] Testing Not receiving my own posts? ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Su

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

Contact. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:09 PM, Edward Leafe wrote: > Quick test... > > -- Ed Leafe -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Fedora 25 Server Spin /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May the Force and farces be with you! ___

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

Ditto. First one have received in years too. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 3:00 PM, Edward Leafe wrote: > On Jun 7, 2017, at 2:16 PM, John Weller wrote: > > > I got it OK and I'm not on gmail. > > Good to know! > > I just re-enabled all accounts that were locked due to excessive bounces. > I’m hoping

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

Well, it came back so . . . On 06/07/2017 05:44 PM, Pete Theisen wrote: > Hi Ed, > > First one I have gotten in years. I don't know why it was bouncing - > maybe because Verizon sold their email services to AOL? > > I get ProLinux, ProPython and DABOUsers normally. Go figure. > > > On 06/07/2017

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

Hi Ed, First one I have gotten in years. I don't know why it was bouncing - maybe because Verizon sold their email services to AOL? I get ProLinux, ProPython and DABOUsers normally. Go figure. On 06/07/2017 04:00 PM, Edward Leafe wrote: > On Jun 7, 2017, at 2:16 PM, John Weller wrote: > >> I g

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

On Jun 7, 2017, at 2:16 PM, John Weller wrote: > I got it OK and I'm not on gmail. Good to know! I just re-enabled all accounts that were locked due to excessive bounces. I’m hoping that this will now go through successfully to them. -- Ed Leafe --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

I got it OK and I'm not on gmail. John Weller 01380 723235 07976 393631 > -Original Message- > From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted > Roche > Sent: 07 June 2017 19:52 > To: profoxt...@leafe.com > Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:35 PM, Edward Leafe wrote: > > Ok, now trying with relaying through gmail. > > -- Ed Leafe > Looks good, but I'm on gmail, so it may not have to travel as far. -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com ___

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

On Jun 7, 2017, at 10:57 AM, Edward Leafe wrote: > Ii was seeing how it counted emails. One post to ProFox resulted in almost > 200 emails. With the average volume we have, that would end up costing over > $3000 a year! So I guess I need to find another SMTP relay service if we’re > going to g

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

On Jun 7, 2017, at 10:09 AM, Edward Leafe wrote: > > Quick test... Ii was seeing how it counted emails. One post to ProFox resulted in almost 200 emails. With the average volume we have, that would end up costing over $3000 a year! So I guess I need to find another SMTP relay service if we’re

RE: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

Slow answer... -- rk -Original Message- From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ted Roche Sent: Wednesday, June 07, 2017 11:45 AM To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay Works for me. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Edward

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new SMTP relay

Works for me. On Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Edward Leafe wrote: > Quick test... > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > > [excessive quoting removed by server] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/listinfo

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Damnit Ed - what R paying U 4 - only 2 have U screw up the archives!!! :-) Ha ha - just bustin'! Keep on Rockin it w/ProFox! -K- Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 18, 2014, at 6:09 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > >> On Aug 18, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote: >> >> Was the list offline for a couple

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On Aug 18, 2014, at 4:58 PM, Jerry Wolper wrote: > Was the list offline for a couple days (before Ed's post), quiet for > those days, or did I not receive some posts? I guess it was quiet. I thought I had screwed something up. ;-) I did mess up the archive database for a little while, so some

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

> I've been doing some maintenance; just wanted to make sure that I > didn't mess things up. Was the list offline for a couple days (before Ed's post), quiet for those days, or did I not receive some posts? -Jerry ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.co

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On 08/16/2014 12:22 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: I've been doing some maintenance; just wanted to make sure that I didn't mess things up. -- Ed Leafe Everything's working for me. Regards, LelandJ --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/signed text/plain (text body -- ke

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Contact! From Hong Kong... On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > I've been doing some maintenance; just wanted to make sure that I didn't mess > things up. -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/s

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Ha ha ha... :-) -K- Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 16, 2014, at 4:47 PM, "Fernando D. Bozzo" wrote: > > SYNTAX ERROR: TEST FAILED AT LINE 1 > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/alternative > text/plain (text body -- kept) > text/html > --- > [excessive quoting r

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

SYNTAX ERROR: TEST FAILED AT LINE 1 --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://mail.leafe.com/mailman/l

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

+1 :-) -K- Sent from my iPhone > On Aug 16, 2014, at 3:04 PM, Koen Piller wrote: > > test passed > > Op zaterdag 16 augustus 2014 heeft Ed Leafe het volgende > geschreven: > >> I've been doing some maintenance; just wanted to make sure that I didn't >> mess things up. >> >> -- Ed Leafe >>

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

test passed Op zaterdag 16 augustus 2014 heeft Ed Leafe het volgende geschreven: > I've been doing some maintenance; just wanted to make sure that I didn't > mess things up. > > -- Ed Leafe > > > > > > > > --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- > multipart/signed > text/plain (text b

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Cough... Cough Cough :) On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Ed Leafe wrote: > Just verifying some db changes... -- .~. Might, Courage, Vision. SINCERITY! / v \ 64-bit Ubuntu 9.10 (Linux kernel 2.6.39.3) /( _ )\ http://sites.google.com/site/changmw ^ ^ May the Force and farces be w

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

You mean it isn't a scam? ... Damn ... I transferred all my money over to him yesterday... -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Paul Newton Sent: 16 March 2012 08:39 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: RE: [ADMIN] Te

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

:) -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dan Covill Sent: 16 March 2012 02:24 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing On 03/15/12 14:37, Vincent Teachout wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: >> Tried t

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Dear Ngombo, I saw your viral video, semi-transparent children, i want to help.   Please donate my portion of my $5,000,000 to your children.    - Original Message - From: Dan Covill To: ProFox Email List Cc: Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 10:23 PM Subject: Re: [ADMIN] Testing On

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On 03/15/12 14:37, Vincent Teachout wrote: > Ed Leafe wrote: >> Tried to tune up the spam filter today, and forgot a parenthesis. Just >> checking to make sure things are working now... >> >> > Getting some kind of tune up spam from some guy claiming to be the > Administrator. Probably a var

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

Ed Leafe wrote: > Tried to tune up the spam filter today, and forgot a parenthesis. Just > checking to make sure things are working now... > > Getting some kind of tune up spam from some guy claiming to be the Administrator. Probably a variation of the Nigerian scam. ___

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On 3/15/2012 3:12 PM, Ed Leafe wrote: > Tried to tune up the spam filter today, and forgot a parenthesis. Just > checking to make sure things are working now... > > > -- Ed Leafe Got it here too. Also testing Thunderbird and gmail. ;) -- Pablo Rivera Sr. "Sea cortés, ande con cuidado, edúq

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

: [ADMIN] Testing I GOT IT Jerry -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 2:12 PM To: ProFox Mailing List Subject: [ADMIN] Testing Tried to tune up the spam filter today, and forgot a

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

I GOT IT Jerry -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 2:12 PM To: ProFox Mailing List Subject: [ADMIN] Testing Tried to tune up the spam filter today, and forgot a parenthesis. Just c

Re: [ADMIN] Testing new DNS

Ed Leafe wrote: > Changed my DNS for leafe.com today, and I think it's working correctly > now. If this goes through to the list, we're good. > Hi Ed, Haven't seen the "E" sig for a long time. Missed it, even. -- Regards, Pete http://pete-theisen.com/ http://elect-pete-theisen.com/ __

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

For whatever reason, my web traffic dropped to a crawl since about last Friday. I'm guessing that a lot of folks just weren't on the internet this last weekend that otherwise would have been. It makes sense that ProFox traffic dropped off too. Kristyne __

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

Or scared in case we put ot stuff in :) Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:21:20 -0500, "Ed Leafe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >everything's OK. Yep - it's just we are all now 100% proficient with everything Fox-related. --

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On Sun, 22 Jun 2008 19:21:20 -0500, "Ed Leafe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: >everything's OK. Yep - it's just we are all now 100% proficient with everything Fox-related. -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscr

RE: [ADMIN] Testing spam filter

It didn’t work... Leafe still came through :) Allen -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Leafe Sent: 25 April 2007 02:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [ADMIN] Testing spam filter Another tweak, this time to the ProFoxTech spam filt

RE: [ADMIN] Testing

We do what we can with what we have ... Hey, put me down as yet another raving fan of ProFox! Gil > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ed Leafe > Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 11:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: R

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On Apr 6, 2007, at 12:01 PM, Jean Laeremans wrote: > Don't worry it's just an age thing, Ed My favorite T-shirt slogan: Growing old is mandatory; growing up is optional. -- Ed Leafe -- http://leafe.com -- http://dabodev.com ___ Post Messa

Re: [ADMIN] Testing

On 4/6/07, Ed Leafe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The messages should be restored now. Sorry for the inconvenience. > Man! I can't get this kind of service from vendors I pay for the privilege of annoying me. Thanks, Ed! -- Ted Roche Ted Roche & Associates, LLC http://www.tedroche.com

  1   2   >