On Wed, March 25, 2009 11:00 am, Ed Leafe wrote:
> Another way of looking at this is that VFP is specialized for solving
> one particular programming problem. It really sucks if you want to control
> microprocessors or create cron jobs. Python is a more generic language
> that can be used in a wid
On Mar 25, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Malcolm Greene wrote:
> We've been coming up the Python learning curve for about a year and
> here's a quick comparison of how Python stacks up to VFP from a VFP
> perspective:
Comparisons of Python vs. VFP are not valid, IMO. Python is more
analogous to C,
Alan,
>> I'm just too spoiled with VFP and it's mix of native OOP, xBase
>> language, SQL language and my favorite - the command window.
> I find that there is nothing really approaching the above on any
> platform, we really *are* spoiled in that respect.
We've been coming up the Python learnin
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:07 -0500, "William Sanders / EFG"
wrote:
> I'm just too spoiled with VFP and it's mix of native
> OOP, xBase language, SQL language and my favorite - the command window.
I find that there is nothing really approaching the above on any
platform, we really *are* spoiled in
This is one of the developers listed in the 'forward' from Michael Babcock -
http://www.familiedevries.eu/jeroen/index.htm
The thing that bothers me is that VFP CAN be used in the Software as a
Service Model, either as a component or totally stand alone. People tend
to forget the data-driven real-
5 matches
Mail list logo
