A client is looking at a new server running Windows 2012 Essentials and
wants to know if there are any potential problems in running a VFP9 SP2
application.
Last week I had an inquiry about running on Server 2012.
I do not have any firsthand experience and do not know the answer to their
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013, at 02:42 PM, Carl Lindner wrote:
Does VFP9 SP2 have any potential problems with these servers. Can VFP9
SP2
run on any windows server? Are there any special requirements? Is
there
a list of VFP9 SP2 server compatibility?
In theory, yes it can. Where you *may*
: 20 September 2013 15:20
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP 9 SP2 and Windows Servers
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013, at 02:42 PM, Carl Lindner wrote:
Does VFP9 SP2 have any potential problems with these servers. Can
VFP9
SP2
run on any windows server? Are there any special requirements
On 9/20/2013 10:19 AM, Alan Bourke wrote:
In theory, yes it can. Where you *may* find issues is in the area of
file locking and performance, due to the SMB2 protocol that Windows
Vista, 7 or 8 clients will use to talk to it not being particularly
designed with things like VFP in mind.
These
http://www.dataaccess.com/whitepapers/opportunlockingreadcaching.html
--
rk
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of MB Software
Solutions, LLC
Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 11:49 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: VFP 9 SP2
On 9/20/2013 11:54 AM, Richard Kaye wrote:
http://www.dataaccess.com/whitepapers/opportunlockingreadcaching.html
Thanks, Richard. From the article: The best data integrity, security
and performance is available by using a client/server database, such as
IBM DB2, Microsoft SQL Server or
I would turn off all forms of write-caching in the network shares! :)
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm wrote:
In theory, yes it can. Where you *may* find issues is in the area of
file locking and performance, due to the SMB2 protocol that Windows
Vista, 7
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013, at 04:48 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
These SMB concerns only come into play when you're accessible VFP on the
backend (DBFs), right? If you're using MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle, or
other RDBMS, you don't have that concern, do you?
I wouldn't have thought
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013, at 04:48 PM, MB Software Solutions, LLC wrote:
These SMB concerns only come into play when you're accessible VFP on the
backend (DBFs), right? If you're using MySQL, SQL Server, Oracle, or
other RDBMS, you don't have that concern, do you?
I wouldn't have thought
On 9/20/2013 1:15 PM, Man-wai Chang wrote:
I would turn off all forms of write-caching in the network shares! :)
Definitely to prevent corruption due to power loss/fluctuation or
network connectivity issues.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President, Chief Software
10 matches
Mail list logo
