Of Fernando D. Bozzo
Sent: 25 April 2015 15:59
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Source Code Version Control
Hi:
I've read this thread http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/498154 late (same
title, 2 months ago), but hope not too late.
From time to time I read that some people keep using old tools
-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Fernando D.
Bozzo
Sent: 25 April 2015 15:59
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: Source Code Version Control
Hi:
I've read this thread http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/498154 late
(same title, 2 months ago), but hope not too late.
From time to time I read
Hi:
I've read this thread http://leafe.com/archives/full_thread/498154 late
(same title, 2 months ago), but hope not too late.
From time to time I read that some people keep using old tools which can
not take advantage of old or modern SCM/DVCS tools.
In this case, I see that some people keep
analyzing the rumor mill and become your own first-hand
authority.
I agree with Paul that the weight of market share seems to have swung to Git.
But they both work, and the price is right.
Good luck. I'm sure you'll be pleased.
Dan
Subject: Re: Source Code Version Control
From: p
I would chip in with the FOXBIN2PRG project on VFPX is worthy of a mention.
-Original Message-
From: ProfoxTech [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: 19 February 2015 14:42
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Source Code Version Control
Thanks both
people have gotten to
work correctly.
Distributed version control systems (DVCS) means that each workstation
has access to all of the source code in the master repository, so you
can work on your laptop or workstation whilst disconnected from the
network. It also means there is no single point
gotten to
work correctly.
Distributed version control systems (DVCS) means that each workstation
has access to all of the source code in the master repository, so you
can work on your laptop or workstation whilst disconnected from the
network. It also means there is no single point of failure
On 2/24/15 1:37 PM, Dan Covill wrote:
I agree with Paul that the weight of market share seems to have swung to Git.
But they both work, and the price is right.
It's easy to get up to speed with basic stuff on Git, especially GitHub.
But Git is so mature and feature-rich and powerful, that
Sorry to bring this old chestnut up again but now we are two here (myself and
Tom) at Flexipol it has become very clear that we need some sort of versioning
software for VFP 9 and I am wondering what is the current flavour of the day
with you folks out there.
Obviously Visual SourceSafe is
I use Subversion/TortoiseSVN along with Christof's TwoFox utility to
convert the binary files.
http://www.foxpert.com/docs/cvs.en.htm
https://subversion.apache.org/
http://tortoisesvn.net/
Various other people here swear by git, though
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 6:07 AM, Dave Crozier
Yes, I use BitBucket more with Xojo projects than I do VFP projects to
be honest. That's where more of my new development efforts are.
For the free version of Xojo, you can only save the project in binary
format which is *not* source control friendly. When you purchase a
license however, the
Another vote for TwoFox to convert to-and-from VCX and SCX based files.
I've been using https://bitbucket.org/ for storing my projects.
BitBucket can use Git and Mercurial.
I like Mercurial better, but Git is much more popular by usage so I use
Git.
I use Smart Git Hg (
[mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully
Sent: 19 February 2015 14:26
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Source Code Version Control
Another vote for TwoFox to convert to-and-from VCX and SCX based files.
I've been using https://bitbucket.org/ for storing my projects.
BitBucket
[mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Kevin Cully
Sent: 19 February 2015 16:30
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: [NF] Xojo Source Control ( was Re: Source Code Version Control )
Yes, I use BitBucket more with Xojo projects than I do VFP projects to be
honest. That's where more of my new
@Chrisof,
What about TFS do you consider pretty bad?
Regards
Rodney
-Original Message-
From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Christof Wollenhaupt
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 1:34 PM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Version
On 9/14/2012 8:58 AM, Rodney Dixon wrote:
@Chrisof,
What about TFS do you consider pretty bad?
Curious to hear that as well. I haven't used it yet but will be soon
when I learn C# and join other projects with our Corporate HQ.
--
Mike Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
President,
On 14 September 2012 15:04, MB Software Solutions, LLC
mbsoftwaresoluti...@mbsoftwaresolutions.com wrote:
On 9/14/2012 8:58 AM, Rodney Dixon wrote:
@Chrisof,
What about TFS do you consider pretty bad?
Curious to hear that as well. I haven't used it yet but will be soon
when I learn C# and
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:56 AM, Dave Crozier da...@flexipol.co.uk wrote:
Never having used alternative software, I think Paul McNett dabbled with
subversion using VFP and wonder if anyone has any comments on what to use
and why. I know about the format of VFP forms etc. being a pain as they
Dave Crozier wrote:
I have had very few occasions to use version control when using VFP but as we
are involved in a really large conversion job here I decided 3 months ago to
use a formal method of version control and as such decided on the old chesnut
Visual Source Safe as we have it under
!
Garrett, thanks for that, I'll take a look.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Cushing
Sent: 12 September 2012 11:30
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Version control
Dave Crozier wrote:
I have had very few occasions
Dave Crozier wrote:
Peter,
Well in retrospect that is what I should have done as I didn't notice the
initial corruption or when it happened and more important WHY! The existing
forms etc have been checking in no problem at all but retrieving ANY older
version just results in an error on
Yep,
Tried all of those to no avail.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
Peter Cushing
Sent: 12 September 2012 11:41
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Version control
Dave Crozier wrote:
Peter,
Well in retrospect
I'd say this is about on the money regarding SourceSafe:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/source-control-anything-but-sourcesafe.html
I use it for VFP stuff at work because I have to but for everything else
I use Subversion.
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of
Alan Bourke
Sent: 12 September 2012 12:44
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Version control
I'd say this is about on the money regarding SourceSafe:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/source-control-anything-but-sourcesafe.html
I use
Sent: 12 September 2012 12:44
To: profox@leafe.com
Subject: Re: Version control
I'd say this is about on the money regarding SourceSafe:
http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/2006/08/source-control-anything-but-sourcesafe.html
I use it for VFP stuff at work because I have to but for everything else
-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Crozier
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2012 9:53 AM
To: profoxt...@leafe.com
Subject: RE: Version control
Alan,
I'd totally agree. anyhow thanks for the PM's offering to help from
everyone but I discovered an old VSS
Subject: Re: Version Control
Is there some sort of data description information that I could gather
about a database in Foxpro?
I need to do version control on databases and tables.
Anyone been down this road before?
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
On 9/12/2012 5:56 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
I have had very few occasions to use version control when using VFP but as we
are involved in a really large conversion job here I decided 3 months ago to
use a formal method of version control and as such decided on the old chesnut
Visual Source
On 9/12/12 2:56 AM, Dave Crozier wrote:
Never having used alternative software, I think Paul McNett dabbled with
subversion using VFP and wonder if anyone has any comments on what to use and
why. I know about the format of VFP forms etc. being a pain as they are not
simple text.
I used
On 09/12/12 02:56, Dave Crozier wrote:
Never having used alternative software, I think Paul McNett dabbled with
subversion using VFP and wonder if anyone has any comments on what to use and
why. I know about the format of VFP forms etc. being a pain as they are not
simple text.
A year ago
Is the mighty 'git' too much for your needs ?
--
Alan Bourke
alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm
___
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list:
Looking for a recommendation for a light-weight/very-simple, open source
version control utility for Windows.
We use Beanstalk (http://beanstalkapp.com/) which is a hosted service based
on Subversion or Git. There is a free version for smaller projects (and most
Fox style projects would fit fine
On 23/07/10 17:07, Malcolm Greene wrote:
Looking for a recommendation for a light-weight/very-simple, open
source version control utility for Windows.
By light-weight, I mean the ability to xcopy an exe (and dll's)
to a folder and begin using the product with a local data source
like SQLite
Looking for a recommendation for a light-weight/very-simple, open
source version control utility for Windows.
By light-weight, I mean the ability to xcopy an exe (and dll's)
to a folder and begin using the product with a local data source
like SQLite ... but with the ability to move
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Ed Leafe
Sent: Saturday, January 26, 2008 12:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [NF] Version control of source code options
On Jan 26, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Alan Lukachko wrote:
I've looked at Subversion and attempted to use it but have not been
successful
On Jan 26, 2008 7:37 PM, MB Software Solutions
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Paul McNett wrote:
Nothing beats learning the subversion command line interface, though.
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
---
On Sat, 26 Jan 2008 20:37:15 -0500, MB Software Solutions
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
Absolutely, aside from maybe some hardcore operating system interaction
and the like. There's more farting about with config files, I find, than
in Windows but that's
MB Software Solutions wrote:
Paul McNett wrote:
Nothing beats learning the subversion command line interface, though.
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
Depends on what you want to do with Linux. Personally, I can't see how
anyone could use Linux as a
On Jan 27, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
Depends on what you want to do with Linux. Personally, I can't see how
anyone could use Linux as a serious development machine without
being at
home with the command line,
Paul: Serious Linux developer maybe, but I am using Ubuntu and I really
haven't done any command line stuff. I did use the command line a
couple of times, but found out later I could have used the Add Programs
interface instead. I use Virtual Box with XP for VFP and also for
testing
Ed Leafe wrote:
On Jan 27, 2008, at 9:48 AM, Paul McNett wrote:
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
Depends on what you want to do with Linux. Personally, I can't see how
anyone could use Linux as a serious development machine without
being at
home with
MB Software Solutions wrote:
Paul McNett wrote:
Nothing beats learning the subversion command line interface, though.
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
My five kids, ages 5 through 19, seem to be able to. All their
schoolwork, casual computer time, etc
In the past I've used Visual Source Safe, but it kept blowing up and
corrupting the master files.
I've looked at Subversion and attempted to use it but have not been
successful with the command line commands using Win XP Pro. My knowledge of
Linux, if this is the correct or better environment,
On Jan 26, 2008, at 11:06 AM, Alan Lukachko wrote:
I've looked at Subversion and attempted to use it but have not been
successful with the command line commands using Win XP Pro. My
knowledge of
Linux, if this is the correct or better environment, is more
limited. Is
there a graphical
Alan Lukachko wrote:
In the past I've used Visual Source Safe, but it kept blowing up and
corrupting the master files.
Visual SourceSafe is a remnant from the past, not very good at doing
what it is supposed to do.
I've looked at Subversion and attempted to use it but have not been
Paul McNett wrote:
Nothing beats learning the subversion command line interface, though.
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
--
Michael J. Babcock, MCP
MB Software Solutions, LLC
http://mbsoftwaresolutions.com
http://fabmate.com
Work smarter, not harder,
On Jan 26, 2008, at 7:37 PM, MB Software Solutions wrote:
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
Why don't you actually try out Linux before making assumptions? The
GUI is as easy as Mac or Windows, and there are just as many GUI
utilities as on the
On Saturday 26 January 2008 20:37, MB Software Solutions wrote:
Paul McNett wrote:
Nothing beats learning the subversion command line interface, though.
If you're not a command line fan, can you survive in a Linux world?
Hi Michael!
There are barriers to learning, I'm afraid. The most
While tidying out a cupboard I found the manual for FreeVCS from 2002.
While this is now Jedi VCS (there are a large number of Delphi Jedi
projects). If you are looking for a free opensource VSC it may be worth
a look.
http://jedivcs.sourceforge.net/index.html
--
Michael Hawksworth
Visual
49 matches
Mail list logo
