Hey, Ed - -
I re-read your post -- now I understand point you were making. I'm
sorry.
I hope you can see how using words like "sloppy" could put one on the
defensive.
Ken
On Feb 16, 2009, at 10:39 PM, Ed Leafe wrote:
> On Feb 16, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Ken Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
>
>> Holy Smoke!
On Feb 16, 2009, at 8:21 PM, Ken Kixmoeller/fh wrote:
> Holy Smoke! Such pedantry over one innocent question.
It's not pedantry; it's simply the difference between correct
programming and good enough programming. That was my point: while
asking for data that is not needed is not corr
Holy Smoke! Such pedantry over one innocent question.
If you can step down off the pedestal for a moment, for some
perspective: This is one SQL statement in a nearly 8,000-line
conversion program. It is a quick cross-check of information derived
by other means. Enginebehavior pops to 70 for
On Feb 16, 2009, at 1:10 PM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> You can get the wrong data when you don't lay out your group bys
> properly.
The point is that the wrong data isn't needed. Only a few fields are
used; they just want to be able to type 'select *' instead of having
to specify th
Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ken Kixmoeller/fh
> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> or you could crate the correct syntax that groups properly, instead of
>>> hoping that it will guess properly.
>>>
>> This is the s
> -Original Message-
> From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com
[mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com]
> On Behalf Of Stephen Russell
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2009 11:10 AM
> To: profoxt...@leafe.com
> Subject: Re: SQL Behavior
>
>
> You can get the wrong data
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 9:21 AM, Ken Kixmoeller/fh
wrote:
>
> On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
>
>> or you could crate the correct syntax that groups properly, instead of
>> hoping that it will guess properly.
>
> This is the same conversion program we talked about it earlier. T
On Feb 16, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Stephen Russell wrote:
> or you could crate the correct syntax that groups properly, instead of
> hoping that it will guess properly.
This is the same conversion program we talked about it earlier. This
is a one-off SQL statement that I will use for the next 3 week
On Sat, Feb 14, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Gerald Foote wrote:
> Try set enginebehavior 70
> Jerry
-
or you could crate the correct syntax that groups properly, instead of
hoping that it will guess properly.
--
Stephen Russell
Sr. Production Systems Programmer
First Horizon Bank
M
Try set enginebehavior 70
Jerry
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Kixmoeller
[mailto:ken.kixmoel...@information-architecture.com]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2009 9:32 AM
To: Profox
Subject: SQL Behavior
Please, someone, give me a swift kick to the brain:
What is the SET command to make
The magic "Send" button strikes again -- I found it. "Latilla"
Ken
Begin forwarded message:
> Subject: SQL Behavior
>
> Please, someone, give me a swift kick to the brain:
>
> What is the SET command to make a SQL statement in VFP9 so you
> don't have to GROUP BY every frickin' field in the ta
11 matches
Mail list logo
