Reading Symantec QA .DTF file

Hi all, Does anyone have a suggestion for extracting the data from an old Symantec QA .DTF file? A client has a very old system that no longer works, and we're hoping to pull the data out for inclusion in the new system I'm writing for them. Thanks! John --- StripMime Report

Re: Reading Symantec QA .DTF file

You can export the data, John. Provided of course that you have the original QA executable. My thinking is they probably will. GaryT On 07/11/13 05:08, John J. Mihaljevic wrote: Hi all, Does anyone have a suggestion for extracting the data from an old Symantec QA .DTF file? A client has

RE: Reading Symantec QA .DTF file

J. Mihaljevic Sent: 06 November 2013 18:08 To: profox@leafe.com Subject: Reading Symantec QA .DTF file Hi all, Does anyone have a suggestion for extracting the data from an old Symantec QA .DTF file? A client has a very old system that no longer works, and we're hoping to pull the data out

RE: [NF] Symantec

Weird, this was days ago Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Mail Server Sent: 16 September 2010 18:45 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: [NF] Symantec Hi gang, resending as didn't show Any reason Symantec end point

RE: [NF] Symantec

Al, Do they have a bog standard server or is the data held on either a Raid-5 or NAS device? We had problems with Symantec and Raid5 and subsequently moved over to Sophos Endpoint and it got rid of all the problems. Dave C -Original Message- From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox

Symantec

Hi gang Any reason Symantec end point would mess with network dbf's. Client is having problems similar to write ahead cache left on errors. VFP9 SP1 on XP Allen ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman

[NF] Symantec

Hi gang, resending as didn't show Any reason Symantec end point would mess with network dbf's. Client is having problems similar to write ahead cache left on errors. VFP9 SP1 on XP Allen ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance

Re: [NF] Symantec

Name change Al ? A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive:

RE: [NF] Symantec

To protect the innocent? No Jean why do you ask? Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans Sent: 17 September 2010 17:05 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Symantec Name change Al ? A+ jml

Re: [NF] Symantec

That's why Al: Mail Server to profox Just joking oc A+ jml ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech

RE: [NF] Symantec

post from there this morning which is why I sent it again from the Profox account. Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Jean Laeremans Sent: 17 September 2010 17:35 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] Symantec

[NF] Symantec

Hi gang I have a client who seems to have the symptoms of write ahead cache problems but IT say write ahead cache is off all the pc's including the data server. I think these are all XP. I suppose hub is a possible but has anyone had problems with Symantec end point ? Allen

RE: [NF] the end of Symantec?

hits overall. As much as I aggressively loath the consumer level Symantec products, I'd say they can rest easy. Dave David Smith Systems Administrator Doan Family of Dealerships (585) 352-6600 ext.1730 dsm...@doandelivers.com www.upstatedigitools.com This message may contain confidential

RE: [NF] the end of Symantec?

As much as I aggressively loath the consumer level Symantec products, I'd say they can rest easy. Thanks for the recap, Dave! Knowing your penchant for getting it right I know I can take your observations to the bank, so to say. Gil -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun

Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?

That POS was written in VB and was a hog. If this new one is as light on the system as the article suggests it might actually be OK. If nothing else it will prompt a lot of price slashing and freebie releases from the AV vendors. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm

Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?

On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:20 +0100, Alan Bourke alanpbou...@fastmail.fm wrote: That POS was written in VB and was a hog. When I say that, I mean the old MS AntiSpyware, I wasn't clear there. -- Alan Bourke alanpbourke (at) fastmail (dot) fm ___

Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?

Matt Jarvis wrote: via Twitter @laprice: If you had any doubts that symantec was doomed, you may now abandon them. http://bit.ly/qbrQm Hi Matt, Didn't they try this in dos 6 something-or-other? ROFL! In other news, a lady on the SLUG Linux list had some intruder from Romania logged

[NF] the end of Symantec?

via Twitter @laprice: If you had any doubts that symantec was doomed, you may now abandon them. http://bit.ly/qbrQm Matt Jarvis Programmer/DBA King | Retail Solutions Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered

[NF] the end of Symantec?

via Twitter @laprice: If you had any doubts that symantec was doomed, you may now abandon them. http://bit.ly/qbrQm Matt Jarvis Programmer/DBA King | Retail Solutions Electronic Privacy Notice. This e-mail, and any attachments, contains information that is, or may be, covered

Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?

How well did the Microsoft Anti-Spyware software work out? LOL --- On Thu, 6/18/09, Matt Jarvis matt.jar...@kingrs.com wrote: From: Matt Jarvis matt.jar...@kingrs.com Subject: [NF] the end of Symantec? To: profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 5:12 PM via Twitter @laprice

RE: [NF] the end of Symantec?

Well for us now its free Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 18 June 2009 18:07 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec? How well did the Microsoft Anti-Spyware software

Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?

by ATT -Original Message- From: Allen pro...@gatwicksoftware.com Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 18:20:20 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: RE: [NF] the end of Symantec? Well for us now its free Al -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com

Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?

gil hale wrote: Free at what cost? If it fails to work as well as Symantec's AV solutions, who pays (dollars or time)? M$, or the hapless victim who was foolish to think that somehow this time for sure M$ actually got it right? My money is not on M$ to provide a thorough solution. Gil

Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?

Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec? To: ProFox Email List profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday, June 18, 2009, 7:23 PM gil hale wrote: Free at what cost?  If it fails to work as well as Symantec's AV solutions, who pays (dollars or time)?  M$, or the hapless victim who was foolish to think

Re: [NF] the end of Symantec?

Michael Madigan wrote: Not the chicks you want to spend your life with. Hi Michael! Not me, not you, the Gates guy's lunch companions. Free at what cost? If it fails to work as well as Symantec's AV solutions, who pays (dollars or time)? M$, or the hapless victim who was foolish to think

RE: [NF] the end of Symantec?

As I use avg im not bothered anyway Allen -Original Message- From: profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profoxtech-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf Of gil hale Sent: 18 June 2009 18:50 To: profoxt...@leafe.com Subject: Re: [NF] the end of Symantec? Free at what cost? If it fails to work

RE: [NF] the end of Symantec?

I had to disable the MS Anti-Spyware because it just slowed my machine to a crawl. I bet this will be the same. --- On Thu, 6/18/09, Allen pro...@gatwicksoftware.com wrote: From: Allen pro...@gatwicksoftware.com Subject: RE: [NF] the end of Symantec? To: profox@leafe.com Date: Thursday

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

, May 30, 2008 3:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate Michael, We upgraded from V8 to the latest corporate version 3 months ago and have ended up kicking it out. It was just so unstable and SLOW SLOW SLOW despite excluding filetypes such as dbf, cdx etc

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

any database related files. Easy to do and to distribute to client PCs if you use the Symantec Control Console on a PC/Server that manages the client PCs. My recommended setups in the documentation will help you get the best performance with excellent protection. Ciao! Gil -Original Message

[NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

I have a client with Symantec Antivirus corporate version 8.0 running on 10 computers. Just recently the date stamp on the virus definitions stopped showing on the client screen and now just shows blank space. This is a known issue. Everything else seems to run fine. They are still

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 2:38 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate I have a client with Symantec Antivirus corporate version 8.0 running on 10 computers. Just recently the date stamp on the virus definitions stopped

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

files, and omit any database related files. Easy to do and to distribute to client PCs if you use the Symantec Control Console on a PC/Server that manages the client PCs. My recommended setups in the documentation will help you get the best performance with excellent protection. Gil

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

% - used up by the Symantec Services may I add. The problem seemed to be more prevalent with AMD processors for some reason, but as we are split about 80% to 20% AMD:Intel it was a pain. We trialed Sophos and last month installed Sophos Endpoint suit which is a smaller footprint, centrally controlled

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

On Fri, 30 May 2008 08:19:05 +0100, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: We trialed Sophos and last month Sophos rules. An exercise in small, fast and unobtrusive. Also fantastic tech support. -- Alan Bourke [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ Post

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

Thanks for all that information. Am I safe continuing to use 8.0 or are there things that will get by it? --- On Fri, 5/30/08, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

Of Michael Madigan Sent: 30 May 2008 16:55 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate Thanks for all that information. Am I safe continuing to use 8.0 or are there things that will get by it? --- On Fri, 5/30/08, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dave Crozier

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

I hadn't heard that. Thanks --- On Fri, 5/30/08, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate To: 'ProFox Email List' profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, May 30, 2008, 12:07 PM Michael, We never had any breaches

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

] Subject: RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate Thanks for all that information. Am I safe continuing to use 8.0 or are there things that will get by it? --- On Fri, 5/30/08, Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Dave Crozier [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

the biggest problem is that the renewal option won't be available after the end of this year so no more virus updates. Renew with an SAV upgrade. If your reseller does not know how to do that let me know and I can handle it for you (yep, I am a Symantec Channel Partner reseller, and can get

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/4236924 --- On Fri, 5/30/08, Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Gil Hale [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate To: profox@leafe.com Date: Friday, May 30, 2008, 4:42 PM the biggest problem is that the renewal option won't

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Michael Madigan Sent: 30 May 2008 22:57 To: ProFox Email List Subject: RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate Thanks Gil. So is it 12/31/2008 when the 8.0 updates stop? I'll probably evaluate sophos too

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

So is it 12/31/2008 when the 8.0 updates stop? I have not looked into when v-8.0 support ends. I got the Symantec Channel Partner and AutoTech reseller accounts to help get my clients their SAV renewals for less than retail. If you know when the client's current license expires, and the number

RE: [NF] Symantec Antivirus Corporate

upgrades to V8 would no longer ship from the end of this year and an upgrade was the only course of action Did you mean the renewals would no longer be available, and an upgrade would be the only Symantec option available? If so, that is what I hear in the US. Re: any alleged superior

[NF] What is the server version of Symantec Ghost called?

there really isn't an edition of Symantec Ghost for server OS's? Thanks! Malcolm ___ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo