Kernel means the program running inside GPU, which is
the c source stored inside nouns vsrc and fsrc.
Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Thomas McGuire написал(а):
> Not sure I know what you mean but I’m using 807 on a MacBook Pro with just
> the full Jqt install.
>
> > On Feb 27, 2020, at 9:28 PM, bill lam wr
Not sure I know what you mean but I’m using 807 on a MacBook Pro with just the
full Jqt install.
> On Feb 27, 2020, at 9:28 PM, bill lam wrote:
>
> Did kernels need any modification?
>
> Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Thomas McGuire написал(а):
>> It took me a while to understand this a little bit. But the
When starting PM, it set a buffer to hold performance
stat data with a default size. When test take very long,
data area overflow and result is rubbish.
You can set a larger buffer (see 6!:10), but my experience
was that it didn't work well.
Fri, 28 Feb 2020, Devon McCormick написал(а):
> I am
I am confused by the output of jpm because I just ran something that took
48 seconds but the detail report of the top-level function shows a total
time of about 70 seconds. How can this be? Am I mis-interpreting the
numbers?
For example:
6!:2 '''FLNMS FLDTS FLSZS FLPARENT DIRNMS DIRDEP''=. Pll
Henry reported (I think/thought) fixing this display (lr) bug within the j9
cycle.
Though that lr bug caused the problems with f. that we both have noted in the
past.
There are 2 separate display bugs with "partial gerunds" (bound adverb with `)
((<(,'0');3)`) NB. not equivalent to displayed
> Seems I found a bug
The question is:
Is the long-standing ability of (`:6), and @., to handle arrays of atomic
representations (and similar), a bug or a feature?
Dan mentioned a decade ago,
No subject [!]
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/general/2009-April/033220.html
(Unfortunatel
the bug is the display of
((3 ar)`) (`(5 ar))(`:6)
((3`)(`5))(`:6)
((3 ar)`) (`(5 ar))
(3`)(`5)
where,
ar =: 1 : '5!:1 <''u'''
The displayed code result is not a valid executable equivalence to the
expression that created it. This appears to be a display only bug, as the code
works inte
I checked the viewtotal required the grid addon which had been
decommitted.
Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Devon McCormick написал(а):
> Hi - I'm following the Performance Monitor documentation but I get a value
> error when I try to invoke "viewtotal_jpm_". Does anyone know why?
>
> The example output show
Did kernels need any modification?
Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Thomas McGuire написал(а):
> It took me a while to understand this a little bit. But the shader can render
> any number of objects you just need to set up the data and tell the shader to
> paint the object. To create 2 cubes I had to modify th
I also don't understand what it is alleged is an error.
Henry Rich
On 2/27/2020 9:06 PM, Julian Fondren wrote:
On 2020-02-27 19:38, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming wrote:
gerunds are lists of atomic representations? (yes,ok, that is a noun)
A more basic description of the problem.
What is
On 2020-02-27 19:38, 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming wrote:
gerunds are lists of atomic representations? (yes,ok, that is a noun)
A more basic description of the problem.
What is the problem though? Is 'modifiers' still a valid subject
for this thread? Even reading your last message, or the t
It took me a while to understand this a little bit. But the shader can render
any number of objects you just need to set up the data and tell the shader to
paint the object. To create 2 cubes I had to modify the a_g_initialize function
and the a_g_paint function. I have placed comments in the co
gerunds are lists of atomic representations? (yes,ok, that is a noun)
A more basic description of the problem. Both of these expressions are illegal
3`+
3`+`5
when 2 nouns are joined with "`", ` acts as the verb ",".
I guess the usefulness of that behaviour is that a "conjunction train of `"
Thanks - that worked. I fixed the page.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 6:22 PM Henry Rich wrote:
> I think viewtotal and viewdetail have been gone for a long time. Use
> showtotal and showdetail.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On 2/27/2020 5:22 PM, Devon McCormick wrote:
> > Hi - I'm following the Performance Mo
I think viewtotal and viewdetail have been gone for a long time. Use
showtotal and showdetail.
Henry Rich
On 2/27/2020 5:22 PM, Devon McCormick wrote:
Hi - I'm following the Performance Monitor documentation but I get a value
error when I try to invoke "viewtotal_jpm_". Does anyone know why?
Hi - I'm following the Performance Monitor documentation but I get a value
error when I try to invoke "viewtotal_jpm_". Does anyone know why?
The example output shows what look like graphical windows so I'm wondering
if I have to run this under Qt.
Thanks,
Devon
--
Devon McCormick, CFA
Quanti
The documentation on various results of the !: conjunction is linked
from the "foreigns" label near the top of the vocabulary page.
The 5!: foreigns are documented at
https://www.jsoftware.com/help/dictionary/dx005.htm
I hope this helps,
--
Raul
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 5:03 PM Hauke Rehr wrot
Hauke,
I would not worry too much about being accused of rtfm
0) it seems to me that you are studying this seriously and that is all that can
be expected of anyone.
1) this is often how we find the areas that can be improved in the manual.
2) it looks like Pascal may have found an aberration bec
I read it in the Vocabulary (pages of the Dictionary
linked to from the Vocabulary, that is), not in NuVoc.
(at least not thoroughly, I remember having had a glance)
That and all your answers I’ll have to think about.
Thanks for taking my request seriously.
I feel like I’ve got way too little expe
gerund are nouns.
Thanks,
--
Raul
On Thu, Feb 27, 2020 at 12:51 PM 'Pascal Jasmin' via Programming
wrote:
>
> Seems I found a bug, though the following approach still works, and has the
> best performance
>
> ar =: 1 : '5!:1 <''u'''
>
> the bug is:
>
> ((3 ar)`) (`(5 ar)) (`:6)
>
> ((3`)(`5)
The description of : in NuVoc gives the most detail I know of. Have you
read it?
Henry Rich
On 2/26/2020 6:20 PM, Hauke Rehr wrote:
Hello again,
I’m still confused about modifiers.
Please tell me where to find more information
that might aid in understanding how this works:
I have an adverb
Seems I found a bug, though the following approach still works, and has the
best performance
ar =: 1 : '5!:1 <''u'''
the bug is:
((3 ar)`) (`(5 ar)) (`:6)
((3`)(`5))(`:6) NB. not valid gerunds, though magically the following still
works
+ ((3 ar)`) (`(5 ar)) (`:6)
8
+ A=: (((3 ar)`) (`(
Or, more robust:
C=:2 :0
mRep=. 5!:5<'m'
mVn=. m V n
mVnRep=. 5!:5<'mVn'
1 :('(',mRep,') u~ ',mVnRep)
)
Example use:
V=:+
,. 10 C (i.2 3)
10 11 12 10
13 14 15 10
(The issue here is that 5!:5 is better than ": when serializing nouns
for use in sentences.)
Perhaps even better, thou
C =: 2 : 0
1 : ((": m) , ' u~ ' , ": m V n)
)
On Thursday, February 27, 2020, 03:04:57 a.m. EST, Hauke Rehr
wrote:
What I want is rather something (C here) callable like
noun1 C noun2
resulting in the adverb
noun1 u~
What you say I knew except if the evaluation
rules changed in j9 a
What I want is rather something (C here) callable like
noun1 C noun2
resulting in the adverb
noun1 u~
What you say I knew except if the evaluation
rules changed in j9 and this is new bahaviour.
That said, I got rid of my nested 1 :/2 :
construct (I didn’t mention that yet)
and tried replacing m
25 matches
Mail list logo
