Specifically, the CursorWidth=10 goes in the user qtide.cfg config
file. From the jqt menu system: Edit: Configure > Qt Ide to bring it
up.
FYI,
--
Raul
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 11:40 AM chris burke wrote:
>
> > At least on Windows 10, JQt has the default cursor a thin flashing |,
> which does
> At least on Windows 10, JQt has the default cursor a thin flashing |,
which does not get any thicker with making the font bigger.
In the current Jqt there is an option for CursorWidth, e.g. try
CursorWidth=10
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 7:54 AM Imre Patyi wrote:
> Dear Programming in J,
>
> Than
Dear Programming in J,
Thank you for your responses.
I should have updated to the current stable version.
(I had thought it would wipe out the old version as
some other programs do; but thankfully it did not.)
Yes, now it is much faster on matrix multiplication.
It is interesting that my laptop is
a) No apologies needed - thanks for all the work you do!!
b) You give me incentive to move to 64 bit OS on the Pi -- Thanks!
- joey
> On 2021May 24, at 14:22, bill lam wrote:
>
> a. I'm lazy, sorry about that. I'll update when I have time.
> b. only arm64 has decent support of simd.
>
> On
a. I'm lazy, sorry about that. I'll update when I have time.
b. only arm64 has decent support of simd.
On Tue, May 25, 2021, 5:15 AM Joey K Tuttle wrote:
> Good segue into a couple of questions that have been on my mind.
>
> a) Any thoughts comments on a current Beta release for Raspbian?
>
> b)
Good segue into a couple of questions that have been on my mind.
a) Any thoughts comments on a current Beta release for Raspbian?
b) Are there strong reasons to move to a 64 bit OS on the Raspberry Pi?
- joey
> On 2021May 24, at 13:54, bill lam wrote:
>
> Matrix multiplication on arm64 andr
Matrix multiplication on arm64 android should already be fully optimized,
including
Blas routine with arm64 asimd kernel
Openmp multithreading
Optimized on desktop too, J runs as fast as other multithreaded optimized
blas lapack such as openblas.
On Mon, May 24, 2021, 3:53 PM Ric Sherlock wr
Just to provide some context to Henry's statement that things have changed
a bit since J8.05, below are the timings I get on my phone (Pixel 4a) using
J902.
,.f"0]2^>:i.13
0.024127
1e_5
2e_6
3e_6
3.4e_5
0.000909
0.000425
0.012697
0.020461
0.139175
1.00075
6.6658
56.7179
On Mon,
J8.05 is very out-of-date for +/ . * . Since then I have rewritten the
JE code a couple of times: the current version is pretty fast and has
special code depending on matrix sizes.
If you are doing performance measurement you need to get an up-to-date
J. Many primitives and combinations run
Dear Programming in J,
I made another test of numerical calculation in J,
this time looking at multiplying two matrices using
(+/ .*) and here is what I have found. It seems to
me that J with (+/ .*) has acceptable speed only for
matrices of order about 128 or below, after which order it
quickly
10 matches
Mail list logo
