[PEDA] Protel 99SE license for sale

2002-10-29 Thread Peder K. Hellegaard

Re: [PEDA] OrCad to Protel conversion

2002-10-29 Thread Fabian Hartery
Thanks Mr. Oborski, I saw my lack of soft poking, after the post. Still, for this file, importing the .max only left me with the component placements and the board outline. Well... I created a PCB library at least, but no traces, nor planes exist. This requires a surgery where the scalpel is rep

Re: [PEDA] OrCad to Protel conversion

2002-10-29 Thread Wojciech Oborski
Fabian Hartery wrote: Still, for this file, importing the .max only left me with the component placements and the board outline. Well... I created a PCB library at least, but no traces, nor planes exist. This requires a surgery where the scalpel is replaced by an axe (a.k.a. a gerber import rout

[PEDA] library review procedure

2002-10-29 Thread Glen Campbell
Hello all, I have several questions about the library part (both schematic symbol and pcb footprint) approval process. To review a new (or an existing) schematic symbol, things to check include:- all pins are included; have the correct pin number and/or name; have the correct electrical t

Re: [PEDA] library review procedure

2002-10-29 Thread Don Mayfield
Hi Glen, Other thing I like to check are: SCH: the pins are correctly oriented (ie the hot spot is where you expect). the pin hotspots are on 10 unit grid points to ease connections. Be careful adding text - it doesn't rotate well. PCB: the holes sizes are correct. the pad numbers match the SCH