At 30-6-2004 00:34, Stephen Noftall wrote:
I think I know the answer to this already, but here it goes anyways: Is
there anyway to get hierarchal designs to work when a component has 2
parts, and they go to the odd/even sub sheets? like if 1/2 of an opamp
goes to sheet 1, and the other half to
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hausherr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:23 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] We Need Your Help!
Terry,
Phillip Restall - [EMAIL PROTECTED] is a programmer
but does not know of an easy way to Batch Move the
Mira
I agree, I also have OrCad 10. Very different from the easy to use earlier versions
and get this. like DXP the global edits suck. I never linked the two. Is Protel
following OrCad, with global edits? Now they are the same product. I would never go
back to the DOS program, even
Given the description below, a simple text editor search-and-replace seems
unlikely to work. But the outlines, as described, will differ consistently in
that the assembly drawing outline will always be the smaller of the two. Thus it
should be possible without too much difficulty to sort them
-Original Message-
From: John A. Ross [RSDTV] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 12:56 AM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] We Need Your Help!
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hausherr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
there is a PADS VAR in Denmark with a utility to do just as you want, it is
for that very purpose
PH
From: Tom Hausherr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Protel EDA Forum [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: 'Protel EDA Forum' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [PEDA] We Need Your Help!
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 16:22:33
We too are in an intermediate state 99SE/2004. Understood 99SE files and
ddb's can be opened/converted to the new format, but can 2004 documents
be read by 99SE? (The EE who does post-design checking uses Camtastic
and 99SE).
Graham Brown, Sutter Instruments.
Dom Bragge wrote:
Can anyone give
The PCB II OrCAD was pretty poor. However, SDT3 was awesome. The 386+
versions were even better - I'm PROUD to say that I still maintain a few old
designs using SDT386+ and PCB386+, and I enjoy doing it, too!
Steve.
-Original Message-
From: Mira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 June
Yes it is interesting, since PCB design magazine had indicated that there
were about 26,000 designers/engineers subscribed to PCD in the whole world
before it became PCDM magazine... Having 3 times the number of designers
out there using the software seems a bit of a stretch.
I tend to think the
Bob,
I have been forwarding all these translation related issues to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] . Phillip has just reported to me that changing the
Silkscreen Line Width in PADS first and then translating them to Protel and
then globally editing the file by moving line widths of a certain type will
work.
Bill,
Just an FYI.
PCB Libraries is in the process of taking out some ad space in PCB Design
Fabrication Magazine and they just reported to us yesterday that their
circulation is now 37,000. This includes both printed and electronic
versions.
Tom H
-Original Message-
From:
Yea.. I think they added 'Manufacturing' to the name because they were
merging PCD with PC FAB magazine... the subscriptions for PCB Design we
falling off due to the industry suffering and lay offs...and they weren't
getting the advertising revenue they needed to keep the magazine alive.
Merging
I'd use mylar and tape if I could turn boards as fast and as cost
effectively as with Protel. Unfortunately, doing 6 mil trace and space could
be somewhat frustrating ;-) Ultimately 2004 has to pay for itself eventually
if its going to be worth upgrading. From what I've read thus far, it would
be
Bill Wrote:
I hear rumors that India and China are training PCB Designers as fast as
they can...
I heard that rumor too. It must be going around. Maybe it's not a rumor.
Tom H
-Original Message-
From: Brooks,Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 1:16 PM
To:
Reminds me of the story about the farmer who slowly sold off little
chunks of his farm, then was surprised one day when he awoke to find
that he now owned the smallest plot on the block. Stupidity is
universal.
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hausherr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
..snip..
John,
Can you point me to where it is documented at *ALL* ?
I keep seeing people here and elsewhere referring to its capabilities and
flexibility, but I've never seen it mentioned - except obliquely - anywhere
in the documentation. In fact I'll go one better. One of my main complaints
-Original Message-
From: Tom Hausherr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 8:31 PM
To: 'Protel EDA Forum'
Subject: Re: [PEDA] We Need Your Help!
snip
Tom
The abilities of the DelpiScript engine exposed in 2004 is
very powerful
indeed, in fact pretty
PH,
When you say that PADS is #1 which part of the Globe
do you have in mind?
Europe uses mainly PCAD/Protel/Orcad. Cadstar/Redac
was one of the options, too.
Mira
--- Protel Hell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't agree with that, FPGA is kinda like
Windows was in the mid 90's,
the CAD
18 matches
Mail list logo
