I get a "Warning: Unconnected net label on net ..." when I run ERC in the
Sch editor. I'm trying to label a bus line with a the following net label
AD[15..0]
How do I resolve this warning?
Tim
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
* To post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
Tim Fifield wrote:
>
> I get a "Warning: Unconnected net label on net ..." when I run ERC in the
> Sch editor. I'm trying to label a bus line with a the following net label
> AD[15..0]
> How do I resolve this warning?
>
The bottom left corner of the net name must touch the wire or bus it
applie
EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Warning: Unconnected net label
Tim Fifield wrote:
>
> I get a "Warning: Unconnected net label on net ..." when I run ERC in the
> Sch editor. I'm trying to label a bus line with a the following net label
> AD[15..0]
> How do I resolv
Tim Fifield wrote:
>
> The bottom left corner of the net name is touching the bus it
> applies to.
>
> The individual signals are labeled where they break out of
> the bus as AD[0] thru AD[15]
>
> Tim
>
The individual signals should be labelled AD0 through AD15 (no square
brackets).
--
Peter
Then it'll be the brackets it doesn't like. AD0 thru AD15 should work fine.
Regards
Andy Gulliver
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Fifield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 30 January 2002 16:22
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Warning: Unconnec
field" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Protel EDA Forum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:21 PM
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Warning: Unconnected net label
> The bottom left corner of the net name is touching the bus it
> applies to.
>
> The individual
Thanks to Peter and Andy! Warning Solved
Tim
-Original Message-
From: Andy Gulliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Warning: Unconnected net label
Then it'll be the brackets it doesn't like. AD0
At 10:55 AM 1/30/2002 -0400, Tim Fifield wrote:
>I get a "Warning: Unconnected net label on net ..." when I run ERC in the
>Sch editor. I'm trying to label a bus line with a the following net label
>AD[15..0]
Others pointed out the problem with naming the individual nets as AD[0]
etc., but I hav
copy. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 2:24 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Warning: Unconnected net label
At 10:55 AM 1/30/2002 -0400, Tim Fifield wrote:
>I get a "Warning: Uncon
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
> At 10:55 AM 1/30/2002 -0400, Tim Fifield wrote:
> >I get a "Warning: Unconnected net label on net ..." when I run ERC in the
> >Sch editor. I'm trying to label a bus line with a the following net label
> >AD[15..0]
>
> Others pointed out the problem with naming the
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2002 5:54 PM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Warning: Unconnected net label
Good point Mr. Lomax
Tim, are you sure you're not a Newf dere buy! Puttin dem signals in
backwards AD[15..0]?
I do believe that I ha
At 02:49 PM 1/30/2002 -0800, Peter Bennett wrote:
>I recalled having a problem with [0..15] vs [15..0] in the past, but
>checked a recent job and found I had used both orders on it (for
>different busses).
*Were these busses connected through ports/sheet entries?* If not then the
bus names may b
>I was getting a persistent ERC "unconnected passive pin" warning with some
>pins that were connected through a net label to a bus and from there to a
>port off-sheet. The net list, however, reported the pins as connected. I
>finally looked on the Protel Knowledge Base. Sure enough, there is a
According to the manual, [15..0] may be used as well as [0..15].
There are other problems with connecting with buses and ports than can
cause errors, warnings, and actual connection failures.
I was getting a persistent ERC "unconnected passive pin" warning with some
pins that were connected th
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
> At 02:49 PM 1/30/2002 -0800, Peter Bennett wrote:
> >I recalled having a problem with [0..15] vs [15..0] in the past, but
> >checked a recent job and found I had used both orders on it (for
> >different busses).
>
> *Were these busses connected through ports/sheet
olphs
Lake Shore Cryotronics, Inc.
Westerville, Ohio
-Original Message-
From: Peter Bennett [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 10:58 AM
To: Protel EDA Forum
Subject: Re: [PEDA] Warning: Unconnected net label
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
>
> At 02:49 PM 1/30/2002 -080
At 07:57 AM 1/31/2002 -0800, Peter Bennett wrote:
>Looking closely at the schematics, it seems I wasn't consistent with the
>order on one bus, and Protel still made the right connections. On the
>processor schematic, I use AD[0..7], but the project sheet and the sheet
>containing the destination
At 11:31 AM 1/31/2002 -0500, Jeff Adolphs wrote:
>I didn't know what you did was possible. I use net labels on each pin
>such as A0, A1, A2,... I was using comment text to label the buss line
>such as AD<7:0>.
>
>The net label on each pin really gets the signal to the right place. I
>always use Gl
Seconded! (especially the control bus).
Regards
Andy Gulliver
> -Original Message-
> From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 31 January 2002 16:45
> To: Protel EDA Forum
> Subject: Re: [PEDA] Warning: Unconnected net label
>
[cut]
> Bus/Port/S
19 matches
Mail list logo
