On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 7:15 PM, alopecoid alopec...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmm... that strikes me as strange. I understand that the Message
objects are immutable, but the Builders are as well? I thought that
they would work more along the lines of String and StringBuilder,
where String is
How annoying. I'll make sure this or something like it gets into the next
release -- which I'm going to try to push next week.
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 8:36 AM, anonymous eric.pe...@hp.com wrote:
Hello,
I was not able to compile a Java file generated by protoc 2.10 from a
rather big .proto
Heh, I remember complaining about this to James when they first
published the byte code spec. It was annoying then and continues to be
annoying today.
On 7/24/09, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
How annoying. I'll make sure this or something like it gets into the next
release -- which
The best way to think of it is:
Builder : Java Message :: C++ Message : const C++ Message
As far as performance goes, it is a common mistake to confuse C/C++
heap memory allocation costs to Java heap allocation. In the common
case, allocations in Java are just a few instructions... comperable