Comment #8 on issue 570 by msaf...@gmail.com: build 2.4.1 failed on mac os
x 10.9
http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=570
Adding #include istream worked for me as well.
--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all
issue notifications to this
Hi everybody,
What's the status of Python 3 support? I'd like to use protocol buffers in
my new Python 3.4-based project.
Thanks,
Ram.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving
Using 2.4.1 version of protobuf java. The message structure is flat and has
a flat structure with 315 fields as in
option java_package = ..
option optimize_for = SPEED;
option java_generate_equals_and_hash = true;
message X {
string field1 = 1;
string field2 = 2;
string field315 =
Am using 2.4.1 version of protobuf java with a single message having a flat
structure with 315 fields within it as in
message X {
string field1 = 1;
string field2 = 2;
string field315 = 315;
}
Seeing 40-50% degradation while deserializing into into Java object .
Has anyone
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Ram Rachum ram.rac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everybody,
What's the status of Python 3 support? I'd like to use protocol buffers in
my new Python 3.4-based project.
The next major release will support python 3. It'll probably be released in
Q3 as protobuf 2.6.0
Thanks Feng.
On one hand I'm happy that Protobuf will support Python 3, on the other
hand having to wait until October-December 2014 will mean that I'll have to
start my project using Python 2, and I'd really like to start it with
Python 3.
Maybe there's a pure-Python implementation of protobuf
