Re: [protobuf] Import .proto file and generated Java classes from JAR

On Mon, 10 Mar 2014 09:22:03 -0700 (PDT) Stik kos stik...@gmail.com wrote: Hello, We have defined a bunch of common messages (like Country, Currency, Money, ...) and packaged them in a JAR together with the generated (and compiled) JAVA classes. We would then like to have multiple projects

[protobuf] Issue 618 in protobuf: Cannot compile protobuf in Solaris 10 x86

Status: New Owner: liuj...@google.com Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 618 by marvin...@gmail.com: Cannot compile protobuf in Solaris 10 x86 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=618 What steps will reproduce the problem? 1. ./configure (under root) 2. 3. What is

[protobuf] Re: Issue 618 in protobuf: Cannot compile protobuf in Solaris 10 x86

Comment #1 on issue 618 by marvin...@gmail.com: Cannot compile protobuf in Solaris 10 x86 http://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=618 Here is the config.log in gtest sub-directory Attachments: gtest-config.log 7.0 KB -- You received this message because this project is

[protobuf] Problem including protocol buffers in existing VC++ project

Hello, i tried to include protocol buffers to our existing project. We use Visual Studio 2008 and VC++. I compiled the .proto file and added the pb.cc and pb.h file to the project. Then i opened project-settings C/C++ and added the folder, which was created by the extract_includes.bat. Then i

[protobuf] build in 64 bits

Hi I'm building my solution in VS2013 for the 64 bits version, can I use *protoc-2.5.0-win32.zip ???*https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/detail?name=protoc-2.5.0-win32.zipcan=2q= Thanks https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/downloads/detail?name=protoc-2.5.0-win32.zipcan=2q= --

[protobuf] Re: Dependencies passed to FileDescriptor.buildFrom() don't match those listed in the FileDescriptorProto.

Hi Nik, Were you ever able to resolve this? I am looking to do the same and I cannot seem to get the desciptor.proto to be included. Easy to do command line, but not with the plugin. Thanks! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group.

[protobuf] Can't use protocol buffers in our existing c++ project

Hello, I'm trying to include protocol buffers to a existing VC++ project. We are using Visual Studio 2008. But I have no clue what to do. I compiled the solution in vsprojects. I ran the tests - everything passed. I extracted the includes. Then i compiled my .proto file and added the .h and

[protobuf] If proto Foo and proto Bar have exactly the same fields, can I use Bar to parse a serialized Foo message?

If proto Foo and proto Bar have exactly the same fields, can I use Bar to parse a serialized Foo message? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Protocol Buffers group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to

[protobuf] Protobuf 2.4.1 headers w/ 2.5.0 link-time library (?)

Hopefully this question isn't a waste of your time. I'm trying to build a program using OpenLighting Architecture and I'm receiving an error that OLA requires 2.5.0, but installed is 2.4.1. Make sure that your headers are from the same version . . . In terminal protoc --version shows 2.5.0, but

[protobuf] Protocol Buffers and Generics

Hello, I want to created a protobuf based infra for inter-service communication. It means that this infra should be able to pass any type of Java object. So we'll have a Java wrapper class with all meta-data about the passed object that is agreed between all clients of the infra, and this

Re: [protobuf] If proto Foo and proto Bar have exactly the same fields, can I use Bar to parse a serialized Foo message?

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 7:28 PM, Zihan Liu updog...@google.com wrote: If proto Foo and proto Bar have exactly the same fields, can I use Bar to parse a serialized Foo message? Yes. The actual message name (or any of the field names for that matter) are not encoded. The only things that matter

Re: [protobuf] Protobuf 2.4.1 headers w/ 2.5.0 link-time library (?)

On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:52 PM, Jon Wooding jcwood...@gmail.com wrote: Hopefully this question isn't a waste of your time. I'm trying to build a program using OpenLighting Architecture and I'm receiving an error that OLA requires 2.5.0, but installed is 2.4.1. Make sure that your headers are

[protobuf] Fast Native C Protocol Buffers from Python

Hi Everyone, I found the following post from 2011 about accelerating decoding by setting PROTOCOL_BUFFERS_PYTHON_IMPLEMENTATION=cpp. Does this still represent current practice to accelerate performance or is there no need to do anything now after installing the Python package?

Re: [protobuf] python proto optimizations

new design/implementation in the next release to significantly improve python sdk's performance, when? the c++ binding has been experimental for years. On Saturday, March 1, 2014 2:49:06 AM UTC+8, Feng Xiao wrote: For patch #1, you can submit it to the issue tracker. We don't have time to

Re: [protobuf] Build in 64bits

On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 11:09 AM, ProTobUS agileproto...@gmail.com wrote: Hi I want to build my solution that use Procol buffer in 64 bits do I have to build protocol Buffers in 64 bits ? Yes. if Yes can I use

Re: [protobuf] [ANN] ProtoBuf.jl - A ProtoBuf library for Julia

On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 5:21 PM, Tanmay K. Mohapatra tanma...@gmail.comwrote: Hi, I am pleased to announce the availability of a protobuf library for Julia language users. https://github.com/tanmaykm/ProtoBuf.jl It will be great to have it listed in the ThirdPartyAddon page and get