Hello.
I'm currently architecting a data platform, and am looking at Protocol
Buffers to solve a variety of problems.
However to assess if Protocol Buffers will be applicable to our solution I
need to know what the roadmap is for future releases.
Many thanks.
Dave.
--
You received this
Is the Any type implemented in the python libraries yet?
I read this on the documentation
*Currently the runtime libraries for working with Any types are under
development*.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Protocol Buffers" group.
To unsubscribe
Hi, just wanted to check my declaration with you guys, is it possible to
reuse the `Study` declaration in the `Denormalised`
package mypackage;
message Dataset {
required string accession = 1;
required string url_self = 2;
optional string title = 3;
optional string description = 4;
I have a data modelling problem and I'm wondering if protobuf could be the
right tool to help me solve this problem.
I have data in one schema and i want to transform it to another schema.
message Dataset {
required string title = 1;
required string description = 2;
}
message Study {
not be
'done' yet =)
Alex
On Jul 6, 11:32 am, A Richardson arichardatw...@gmail.com wrote:
I am writing a python extension (in C++) which needs to work with
protobufs. I would also like to make use of the experimental C++/
Python extension in my application. (i.e. I would like my extension
I am writing a python extension (in C++) which needs to work with
protobufs. I would also like to make use of the experimental C++/
Python extension in my application. (i.e. I would like my extension to
handle python protobuf messages which are actually backed by c++
messages.)
Is there a
Madhav,
When you receive a raw string of bytes containing a message, you must first
know the type of the message before you can parse/deserialize it. For
example, with C++, you must first instantiate a message of the appropriate
type, and then parse the bytes into the newly instantiated message
