The multiprocessing queue uses pickle to serialize/deserialize the objects
before/after sending them between processes.
Since the proto message contains a C extension class, it can't be serialized
or deserialized with pickle. And it doesn't need to, just use the protobuf
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Yegor yegor.jba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Kenton,
In the Python version there are now two versions of InputStream, one
buffer-based, the other one array-based, for compatibility with App
Engine-like environments. Do you know how big the performance penalty
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Petar, can you review this?
The patch looks good.
I'll submit it in SVN after we receive the CLA.
Christian: Thanks, I don't think we had any idea this was happening (doh).
Can you sign the CLA if you haven't
2009/1/29 bart van deenen bart.vandee...@gmail.com
Hi Kenton
Here's the details:
kubu:~$ protoc --version
libprotoc 2.0.3
kubu:~$ python -V
Python 2.5.2
This is a self-compiled protoc (because I had added the actionscript
output generator). I actually find in CHANGES.txt for 2.0.2
result in an error.
Thanks,
Helder
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 12:19 AM, Piotr Findeisen piotr.findei...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Dec 8, 7:27 pm, Petar Petrov pe...@google.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
Hey Petar, isn't there a patch someone
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Alek Storm alek.st...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 1:16 PM, Kenton Varda ken...@google.com wrote:
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 1:03 AM, Alek Storm alek.st...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it really that useful to have ByteSize() cached for repeated fields?
If it's
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Kenton Varda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Petar, isn't there a patch someone was trying to submit that implements
text format parsing? (For real, not by wrapping protoc.) What's the status
of that?
I'll review it today.
Hopefully the author hasn't forgotten
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Kenton Varda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[cc'ing Petar]
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:23 PM, DVusBoy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have a couple of questions regarding the Python implementation.
1. There is a discrepancy between the function signatures of the
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 5:14 PM, codeazure [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 31, 5:19 am, Petar Petrov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, there are plans to improve performance. I have spent a little time
on
this without significant improvements.
I think performance can hardly get a drastic
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, andres [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I would like to use protocol buffers in my python code but currently
the serialization and parsing methods are too slow compared to
cPickle. I've read several posts stating that this is because the
python implementation
10 matches
Mail list logo
