Hello,
Thank you for adding a link!
We'd like to accept patches. However, we don't have enough engineering
resources to maintain another platform. Supporting a different platform
requires much testing work in the release process (also user support). I'd
suggest to keep the C++ builder
My experience has been that C++Builder is worse (less standards-
compliant / less capable) than GCC and MSVC, so most changes to
accommodate it are actually working around its shortcomings.
I've also struggled with C++Builder in the past.
I was working some on getting protobuf to work
me know what I can do to
help facilitate this.
Thank you,
Scott Saad
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/protobuf/-/5L32fr5BM-QJ.
To post to this group, send
I actually have most of it compiling
- libprotobuf
- gtest
- gtest_main
- libprotobuf-lite
I'm currently trying to get *libprotc* compiling and failing somewhere
around what seems to be Google's implemtation around scoped_ptr for the
ExtensionGenerator, ServiceGenerator,
.
If I am able to get things compiling and tests running would it be possible
to get a code review and potential merge these contributions in?
Thanks in advance!
Scott Saad
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Protocol Buffers group.
To view this discussion
Hi there. I don't have the patch you're referring to but I'm looking at
getting this compiling. So far I've not had a lot of success as I'm getting
hung up on the hash.h file. For some reason C++Builder is blowing up
everywhere with this one. I'm still trying to track things down.
I can keep
Good to hear somebody else is trying to do or has tried to do this. I have
defined hash/hash_map/hash_set in the section for the __BUILDERC__ (I named
it _CPPBUILDER but same thing).
Anyway I'm getting all sorts of E2238 errors (multiple declarations for
hashKey and hash_map, etc). I'm trying
