I got protobuf to build on Solaris 8. All tests are passing on sparc
(both 32 and 64-bit), two tests are failing on i386. (amd64 build is
yet to come)
[ FAILED ] CommandLineInterfaceTest.OutputDirectoryIsFileError
[ FAILED ] DiskSourceTreeTest.MapDirectory
[ RUN ]
...@oddren.com wrote:
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio 11,
using libCstd, with a few patches. Works well enough to compile and
run the add_person_cpp/list_people_cpp examples.
I include
-- if your employer
does
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, bmcarnes_proto...@oddren.com
wrote:
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio
11,
using libCstd, with a few patches. Works
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, bmcarnes_proto...@oddren.com
wrote:
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio
11,
using libCstd, with a few patches. Works well enough to compile
and
run the add_person_cpp
on this patchhttp://
code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html-- if your employer
does
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, bmcarnes_proto...@oddren.com
wrote:
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio
11,
using libCstd
@Monty
I followed your steps but make check still fails with following
errors
make check
Making check in .
make check-local
Making lib/libgtest.a lib/libgtest_main.a in gtest
`lib/libgtest.la' is up to date.
`lib/libgtest_main.la' is up to date.
Making check in src
make check-am
make
on this patchhttp://
code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html-- if your employer
does
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, bmcarnes_proto...@oddren.com
wrote:
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio
11,
using libCstd
I was finally able to compile it correctly and evaluate its
correctness using tests.
Kenton,
Is there anything else I need to evaluate before using compiler
and binaries. I can provide patch now if its needed.
I am also going to try same procedure on AIX too . Is there any other
If the tests pass, it should be good to go. Please do submit patches.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:09 PM, vikram patilvik...@gmail.com wrote:
I was finally able to compile it correctly and evaluate its
correctness using tests.
Kenton,
Is there anything else I need to evaluate before
:
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio 11,
using libCstd, with a few patches. Works well enough to compile and
run the add_person_cpp/list_people_cpp examples.
I include the build instructions and patch
on this patchhttp://
code.google.com/legal/corporate-cla-v1.0.html-- if your employer
does
On Wed, Jun 3, 2009 at 10:53 PM, bmcarnes_proto...@oddren.com wrote:
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio 11
at 10:53 PM, bmcarnes_proto...@oddren.com wrote:
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio 11,
using libCstd, with a few patches. Works well enough to compile and
run the add_person_cpp/list_people_cpp examples
Hi
I compiled 2.10 in Sun studio 11, with the -library=stlport4 option,
but I have to link protobuf against other programs which are not
compiled with this option (and whose source code i don't have) , and i
believe they're incompatible because of this.
Is there any hope for me? :)
thanks
Probably not. LibCstd isn't complete enough for protobuf.
I was able to get protobuf 2.1.0 to work well under Sun Studio 11,
using libCstd, with a few patches. Works well enough to compile and
run the add_person_cpp/list_people_cpp examples.
I include the build instructions and patch set
Kenton Varda wrote:
PS. Did you see the patch on issue 105 for ptrdiff and offsets_ ?
Yeargh, I wish I could tell the code site to e-mail me whenever someone
submits an issue, because I always forget to go look.
Yeah. I completely agree... It doesn't seem to email on updates either.
I
I have access to sun studio 12 so I tried to compile protobuf 2.1.0
with this version of the compiler.
This is the error I get:
make all-recursive
Making all in .
Making all in src
source='google/protobuf/descriptor.pb.cc' object='descriptor.pb.lo'
libtool=yes \
DEPDIR=.deps depmode=none
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, cosmin.cremare...@gmail.com wrote:
./google/protobuf/stubs/once.h, line 114: Warning (Anachronism):
Formal argument 2 of type extern C void(*)() in call to pthread_once
(_once*, extern C void(*)()) is being passed void(*)().
This warning seems to be saying
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Monty Taylor mo...@inaugust.com wrote:
Kenton Varda wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, cosmin.cremare...@gmail.com
mailto:cosmin.cremare...@gmail.com wrote:
./google/protobuf/stubs/once.h, line 114: Warning (Anachronism):
Formal
Kenton Varda wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Monty Taylor mo...@inaugust.com
mailto:mo...@inaugust.com wrote:
Kenton Varda wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:35 AM, cosmin.cremare...@gmail.com
mailto:cosmin.cremare...@gmail.com
Hi
I'm running into some issues when compiling (more exactly linking)
protobuf 2.0.3.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Cosmin
CXX=/nettools/sunstudio/sunstudio11/SUNWspro/bin/CC CC=/nettools/
sunstudio/sunstudio11/SUNWspro/bin/cc ./configure --prefix=/src/work/
cosmin.cremare...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
I'm running into some issues when compiling (more exactly linking)
protobuf 2.0.3.
Thanks in advance for any help.
Cosmin
CXX=/nettools/sunstudio/sunstudio11/SUNWspro/bin/CC CC=/nettools/
sunstudio/sunstudio11/SUNWspro/bin/cc ./configure
21 matches
Mail list logo
