On Nov 13, 5:04 am, "Petar Petrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few things. The current Python API has to remain pure-Python because some
> clients aren't able to use C/C++ extensions (like AppEngine).
> Boost is generally not accepted in Google, so a Boost::Pythonit interface
> will have to dis
you could consider wrapping protobuf-c... that will at least save you
the hassle of writing the C wrapper around C++.
- dave
On Nov 12, 10:04 am, "Petar Petrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 5:14 PM, codeazure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 31, 5:19 am, "Petar Petr
On Sun, Nov 9, 2008 at 5:14 PM, codeazure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Oct 31, 5:19 am, "Petar Petrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, there are plans to improve performance. I have spent a little time
> on
> > this without significant improvements.
> > I think performance can hardly get
On Oct 31, 5:19 am, "Petar Petrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes, there are plans to improve performance. I have spent a little time on
> this without significant improvements.
> I think performance can hardly get a drastic improvement without a C++
> extension module (which we are planning to
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, andres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use protocol buffers in my python code but currently
> the serialization and parsing methods are too slow compared to
> cPickle. I've read several posts stating that this is because the
> python impleme
Jeremy Leader wrote:
> Might it be possible to use the XS wrappers generated by protobuf-perlxs
> from Python?
Aaah, not enough caffeine yet. I somehow confused XS (Perl-specific)
with SWIG (supports Perl, Python, and many others). Never mind!
--
Jeremy Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--~--~-
Might it be possible to use the XS wrappers generated by protobuf-perlxs
from Python?
--
Jeremy Leader
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
andres wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use protocol buffers in my python code but currently
> the serialization and parsing methods are too slow compared to
> cPickle. I'v
[+petar]
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:47 AM, andres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I would like to use protocol buffers in my python code but currently
> the serialization and parsing methods are too slow compared to
> cPickle. I've read several posts stating that this is because the
> pyth
Hi,
I would like to use protocol buffers in my python code but currently
the serialization and parsing methods are too slow compared to
cPickle. I've read several posts stating that this is because the
python implementation has not been optimized for speed yet. Are there
plans to improve the perf
