Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/qpid-proton/pull/36
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14649098#comment-14649098
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-697:
Commit 4c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14649099#comment-14649099
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on PROTON-781:
Commit c1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-697?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14649101#comment-14649101
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on PROTON-697:
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request
Hi Robbie -
It doesn't look like there are any open blockers for 0.10.
Can we branch 0.10 and put out release candidate 1?
Here is the list of open JIRAs targetting 0.10:
Bug PROTON-969
Cyrus SASL module calls sasl_server_init once for every incoming connection
Bug PROTON-950
Arg! Sorry, PROTON-969 is a blocker!
So, if that's not in by Monday... beta-2?
-K
- Original Message -
> From: "Ken Giusti"
> To: proton@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, July 31, 2015 9:03:25 AM
> Subject: Re: 0.10 beta2?
>
> Hi Robbie -
>
> It doesn't look like there are any open blo
I was originally thinking a beta2 this week to help shake anything
else out and hopefully enable an RC+ vote early next week.
PROTON-950 is a blocker and still open. Work has been done to restore
support for PLAIN on non-SSL transport, but it seems some remains to
actually use it in the other comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14649213#comment-14649213
]
Dominic Evans commented on PROTON-969:
--
It seems like these calls would increment a r
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14649352#comment-14649352
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-969:
This is true, but not all that relevant t
Robbie Gemmell created PROTON-971:
-
Summary: [proton-j] multi-frame deliveries may be broken when sent
if buffered along with a futher delivery for the same link
Key: PROTON-971
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robbie Gemmell updated PROTON-971:
--
Attachment: PROTON-971_test.patch
Attaching a test that demonstrates the issue.
Proton-c passes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andrew Stitcher updated PROTON-941:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 0.10)
> pn_transport_set_server should fail if invoked after binding.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PROTON-941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14649511#comment-14649511
]
Andrew Stitcher commented on PROTON-941:
I removed the fix target as I don't belie
14 matches
Mail list logo
