Not works for me too ;-(
$$('div.number').each(function (node) {
var edit = node.select('a#edit')[0];
if( edit ) {
...
}
});
It works in Firefox and Safari and NOT works in IE ;-(
On Nov 14, 12:29 am, Gabriel Gilini [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 4:17 PM,
How do I apply a stop to a running periodic updater?
The below does not stop it!
var counter;
function periodic()
{
var myAjax = new Ajax.PeriodicalUpdater
('meny','../TJx/meny.php'+'?rand='+new Date().getTime(),{method:
'post',frequency:10.0,decay:2, onSuccess:
On Nov 14, 6:30 am, RobG [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 7:39 am, Ehsun [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've create an Object in my pages script tags, something like this:
a = new A();
and when I want to call a method of a in the script which is actually
the ajax content (evaluated
Just to let everyone know i may have found a little bug in the
Ajax.Responders .. or maybe it is mean to to this way
When creating an Ajax.Updater for instance if you use the method
onComplete in the Ajax.Options then it never unloads the Request from
the Ajax.Responders counter
If you
Hi,
The list on the download page[1] is up-to-date, isn't it? If any
knows that that information is inaccurate, please raise a ticket in
Lighthouse[1] with the details (including how you know!) and I'll fix
it post haste.
[1] http://www.prototypejs.org/download
[2]
here is a pastie of the test i ran in Firefox at least
http://pastie.org/314776
Regards
Alex
- Original Message -
From: T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 12:02 PM
Subject:
sorry my original code was wrong ..
http://pastie.org/314784
The code above actually says 2 requests when there should only be 1 !!!
Here is a better example i cant recreate the problem entirely as it
needs a few periodical updaters to be going on in the background but
when they
Yep cheers T.J. This all makes alot of sense. Nice to understand
everything rather than just go about doing things in a certain way
because it's the done thing!
On Nov 14, 11:02 am, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
My tactic is going to be to stop defining them inline, therefore not
Thanks. It works. The problem is solved ;-)
On Nov 14, 12:03 pm, Mona Remlawi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Alann,
I believe the problem is that you are using the variable name to be
the same as the ID of the element.
IE tends to support referencing an element with its ID.
Ex:
div
Ah, That is much cleaner. Thank you.
On Nov 13, 6:18 pm, kangax [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 13, 3:43 pm, Diodeus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been dynamically building a slideshow based on a list of image
filenames. I use the following code to create thumbnails:
Thanks, I didn't see that. I was looking for a link on the homepage.
Does anyone know if IE 5.5 for the Mac is supported?
-Hector
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4:12 AM, T.J. Crowder [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi,
The list on the download page[1] is up-to-date, isn't it? If any
knows that that
Hi,
Does anyone know if IE 5.5 for the Mac is supported?
IE 5.5 for the Mac isn't even supported by Microsoft. :-) They EOL'd
it a couple of years ago.
--
T.J. Crowder
tj / crowder software / com
On Nov 14, 4:08 pm, Hector Virgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, I didn't see that. I was
Of course, you'd save yourself all of this trouble by using event
delegation[1]. :)
Best,
Tobie
[1] http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/faq#delegation
On Nov 14, 2:04 pm, bluezehn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yep cheers T.J. This all makes alot of sense. Nice to understand
everything rather than
hate to be a downer, but yer SVN repos is a bit hokey...
just an FYI
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 12:37 PM, disccomp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Update:
Setup the project at
http://code.google.com/p/scriptaculous-portal-extender/
( svn checkout
Thanks, TJ. That's a really good point, but unfortunately many of our
clients use old Macs with IE 5.5. I would still like to provide them with
some basic Javascript UI enhancements. Does that mean I would have to write
native Javascript for them?
-Hector
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 8:31 AM, T.J.
Apparently, this does not work? I get this error message when I try
it:
uncaught exception TypeError: Object #an Object has no method 'each'
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us
each does an array itterator no ?
- Original Message -
From: laurin1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, November 14, 2008 8:29 PM
Subject: [Proto-Scripty] Chrome, Object and each()
Apparently, this does not work? I
It works fine on arrays, if that is what you are asking.
On Nov 14, 2:39 pm, Alex Mcauley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
each does an array itterator no ?
- Original Message -
From: laurin1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Prototype script.aculo.us prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
Sent:
I asked for info on where it would be best to collaborate on this and
no one offered any suggestions. What/where do you suggest?
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To
I'm sorry. My brain is fried, it works on arrays with simple values,
but not arrays with Objects IN them. Mispoke.
For instance, in IE and in Chrome, this works fine:
$a = new Object();
$a['testme1'] = 'tested1';
$a['testme2'] = 'tested2';
$a['testme3'] =
i think googlecode is fine, i'm just saying that the svn repos is a bit
messed up
this link does not work
http://scriptaculous-portal-extender.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/scriptaculous-portal-extender-read-only
this link does
On Nov 15, 6:18 am, Hector Virgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks, TJ. That's a really good point, but unfortunately many of our
clients use old Macs with IE 5.5. I would still like to provide them with
some basic Javascript UI enhancements. Does that mean I would have to write
native
On Nov 14, 11:52 am, Abel Figueiredo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This solution. Is it for same-named form controls? My solution doesn't
have same-named controls.
So with this i can send the return from mergeForms... as my
parameters, right?
Yes. Just pass it as many forms as you need.
[...]
On Nov 14, 7:03 pm, Namotco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, should be:
eval(someVar=function() { this.elm=$('outputs'); }; s=new
someVar(); s.innerHTML='test';);
Omitting `var` is generally a bad idea. Either use `var` or assign to
a property directly (as in `window.foo = 'bar'`);
On Nov 14, 4:17 pm, laurin1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry. My brain is fried, it works on arrays with simple values,
but not arrays with Objects IN them. Mispoke.
For instance, in IE and in Chrome, this works fine:
$a = new Object();
$a['testme1'] = 'tested1';
See my comments below. - Ken Snyder
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:17 PM, laurin1 [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
I'm sorry. My brain is fried, it works on arrays with simple values,
but not arrays with Objects IN them. Mispoke.
For instance, in IE and in Chrome, this works fine:
$a = new
Like I said, this code works just fine in IE, but in Chrome, it does
not work.
$aEle = $('TicketOptions').getElementsByClassName('LoadChecks');
$aEle.each(function($s){
if($s != $sEle) $s.checked = false;
});
No error in the browser, but the JS debugger
27 matches
Mail list logo
