Hi,
You need to bind your onSuccess function to 'this', more here:
http://proto-scripty.wikidot.com/prototype:tip-using-an-instance-method-as-a-callback-or-event-handler
http://blog.niftysnippets.org/2008/04/you-must-remember-this.html
http://www.alistapart.com/articles/getoutbindingsituations
Is there a way to resolve this conflict within prototype? My portal
uses jQuery and I'm the only developer with a preference of
prototype.js. I've tried the jQuery.noConflict() with no luck. I
don't want to abandon my prototype.js skillset for jQuery but it's
looking like I'm the one that need
On Feb 5, 9:29 pm, Michael wrote:
> Thank you all - Kangax's low profile technique works like a champ.
>
> Walter Lee: Regular expressions hurt my head. I will get there one
> day.
>
> The actual thing I am working on take about 100 alpha/numeric
> sequences of no real logical order... so makin
Hello mail list user,
I hope you can help me one more time.
A part of the website www.gerrits-worlddecor.de/neu/handcraft.php# is
the table on the right side.
This table contains some images. One attribute of this images is
onmouseover="item ...
As default you will see images of the product line
On 6 Lut, 12:09, "T.J. Crowder" wrote:
> You need to bind your onSuccess function to 'this', more here:
>
Thanks very much :)
i did it and works good
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype & scrip
On Feb 6, 7:36 am, ColinFine wrote:
> On Feb 5, 9:29 pm, Michael wrote:> Thank you all -
> Kangax's low profile technique works like a champ.
>
> > Walter Lee: Regular expressions hurt my head. I will get there one
> > day.
>
> > The actual thing I am working on take about 100 alpha/numeric
> >
I tested and adapted (removed XHTML references, used paragraphs
instead of line breaks and inserted another div into the #closeme
element as suggested by the docs, see
http://wiki.github.com/madrobby/scriptaculous/effect-slidedown)
your script and it really seems that scriptaculous does not behav
It looks like your on your way to a solution. It's one thing to post
technical questions, your first post was great. You'll probably see
this again GIYF(Google is your friend) Try experimenting with events.
(Event.observe)
Before asking for code, Ask yourself, "Am I a help vampire?"
http://www.sl
The code below generates a "too much recursion" message in Firebug.
What am I doing wrong?
test page
window.onload = function(){
alert("load...");
$("test").innerHTML = "loaded!";
alert("...ed"
I have Channel class with element field, but i don't know how in
Ajax.Updater get to this field. Is this possible without passing
another parameters to method updateById ?
var Channel = Class.create({
initialize: function(element) {
this.element = $(element);
},
updateById: function (i
I have got problem with droppables and draggables elements:
When I drag draggables object over droppables I display an alert and
if someone choose [ok] then the draggables is put correctly into
droppables object and this is fine, but when someone choose [close]
then draggables element stays in pla
Hi,
I'm experimenting with scriptaculous effets for a website I'm
building. Since I got some problems, I built the simplest page I can
imagine and tried to apply a slideup/slidedown effect, and the result
even in this page is not good, the last part of the text keeps
"appearing" at the end of t
Panic over, it works as expected now.
Had to restart my server though.
On Feb 6, 4:08 pm, donal1976 wrote:
> The code below generates a "too much recursion" message in Firebug.
> What am I doing wrong?
>
>
>
> test page
> script>
>