Don't see why not though it'd slow down the user experience a bit (not
necessarily a good thing).
Have the onclick block, send data to server, server responds, then in
the Ajax callback send user to the destination via window.location
Note: I haven't done this, it's just an off the top of my
On 2/15/2010 3:33 AM, gwyohm wrote:
hi,
why not using prototype cross-browser document.viewport methods ?
document.viewport.getHeight()
simple answer: still learning.
I very much appreciate the suggestion !
--
Bill Drescher
william {at} TechServSys {dot} com
--
You received this message
@DJ Mangus: That would have been my simple solution too. Capture the
click event, do my ajax mojo, and then forward them. But like you
mentioned, it will most likely affect the user experience.
@manfmnantucket: Have you ever thought about using google analytics?
It offers the generic visitor info
Is there a Prototype function to call servlet?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us group.
To post to this group, send email to prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
If you only want the child elements for a particular element, use this:
div id=whatever
ol
li
a href=#/a
/li
/ol
/div
Use this:
$$('#whatever ol')
.then, just use whatever enumerable you need to cycle through them.
On the flip-side, you
Did you try this?
http://www.prototypejs.org/api/ajax/request
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:23 AM, albert kao albertk...@gmail.com wrote:
Is there a Prototype function to call servlet?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype script.aculo.us
Sorry to bump this so soon, but my client is getting itchy. Has anyone
seen anything like this, where an Ajax Updater will not run in a local
file context under IE8? No errors on screen, but no updated content,
either. I've updated to 1.6.1, moved my call to the updater from a
Um, maybe I'm whack, but...
Doesn't an AJAX request need an HTTP server? Am I correct in
understanding that you are just trying to distribute files/static
content?
-Original Message-
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
[mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On
I'm doing a GET request using Ajax.Updater, and as far as I know, GET
will work without a server. I use it all the time to test form layouts
in a browser on my local computer.
I have a random quotation that loads into a DIV on the home page (you
can see it here:
I have a cut-down example for anyone who has a moment to test. The
linked zip contains these files:
_1.html
_2.html
_3.html
_4.html
_5.html
_6.html
_7.html
_8.html
_9.html
index.html
prototype.js
http://scripty.walterdavisstudio.com/local_ajax.zip
The page works fine under Safari or Chrome
Thanks for the thoughtful suggestions...
@djmangus - I already have this working synchronously, but I'm trying to do
a/b testing on things like pricing and conversion rates, and the extra delay
does affect abandonment rates, especially over slow/dialup connections.
Jeff C - I've looked at
hi walter,
this seem to be a known issue on rails trac.
http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8259
It only happens on file:/// protocol when native XmlHttpRequest is
used which is as a matter of fact default configuration.
to work around this issue, you might want to patch your prototype.js
file in
I am using the BlindDown effect on a page to display multiple archived
web polls. Is there anyway to I can us a master reset link instead of
creating a reset link for each effect div?
Thanks,
Aimee
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype
13 matches
Mail list logo
