I did what you told me ... it's working perfectly in Safari 4 and IE8,
but ...
in GoogleChrome i get the following message in the console Uncaught
TypeError: Object [object HTMLDivElement] has no method 'getOpacity'.
- error in effects.js:line 357 ( from: this.element.getOpacity() ||
0.0, ). If i
Hi, as I said in this ticket, you can use this code:
http://gist.github.com/162593
for bubbling focus/blur. I have been using it for months and never
have a single problem with this approach :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Prototype
I think I solved the problem ... not sure yet ... Yesterday I
compressed prototype.js using bananascript. I think it did something
wrong inside the source code. Now it seems ok in Google Chrome also...
at lease until now.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
You can create a js function in the parent file, something like
function myOpacity(){ new Effect.Opacity('element ID', { from: 1,
to: 0.4, duration: 0.7});}
when you need the opacity to execute, just call the function from de
iframe this way
parent.myOpacity();
hope this helps.
On 27 mayo,
I have a PeriodicalExecuter that is calling a function every so often
that makes several AJAX calls. I am not having any luck getting the
PeriodicalExecuter to stop via the onFailure callback in the Ajax call.
Is this possible? I see in the API doc that I can use stop() within the
Ok this doesn't make any sense to me. The following code works in IE8
but not IE7. The Ajax calls never get fired according to my proxy
software. I don't have the luxury of firebug since I am relegated to IE
here at work. Any ideas?
!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0
It appears that IE7 doesn't like the port number added to the URL. Any
thoughts on how to get around this? I have to have the port numbers.
From: prototype-scriptaculous@googlegroups.com
[mailto:prototype-scriptacul...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Russell
Keith
Sent: Friday, May 28,
Sorry for this short reply which may not even be correct but...
Usually the port number is considered part of the URL from the server
session viewpoint so if you're trying to go back to a different port
than the rest of your app uses, that could be a problem. [I may have
butchered this
The code posted is all the code there is. It is a simple little script
to check that it can access a specific page on several servers. The
servers are behind a load balancer using port forwarding hence the port
requirement. Port 801 goes to server1 and port 802 goes to server2 and
so on. The
