>
> Here is the page being called . . .
>
> sayHi = function(){
> alert ('Hi');
> };
>
>
> My problem is that if I replace *alert* with *document.write* then the
> page gets replaced with a new page. I thought the idea behind AJAX.Updater
> was to replace the DIV with new data, or in this c
Don't worry about that wall, I've already got a nice soft dent in it!
On Jul 27, 2012 5:38 PM, "Jim Longo" wrote:
> Thanks both Jason and Phil, there's a lot of new things to try there.
> I'll see if they lead me anywhere, and prevent me from breaking the wall
> that I have been banging my head
Thanks both Jason and Phil, there's a lot of new things to try there. I'll
see if they lead me anywhere, and prevent me from breaking the wall that I
have been banging my head against. :)
On Friday, July 27, 2012 4:23:10 PM UTC-4, Jason wrote:
>
>
> Phil
>
> setting the content of an element
Thanks for that Jason... must be another part of that "inner chamber" code
I'm yet to break! LOL (just teasing)
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Jason Westbrook wrote:
>
> Phil
>
> setting the content of an element via the innerHTML property was
> deprecated for the $("elmentid").update(content)
Phil
setting the content of an element via the innerHTML property was deprecated
for the $("elmentid").update(content) function. Or by using
the $("elmentid").insert(content) function if appropriate.
Jason Westbrook | T: 313-799-3770 | jwestbr...@gmail.com
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Phil
Jim,
I shoulda put this in my last email...
Here are two ways to set the individual fields using prototype:
$('my_div').innerHTML = szUpdate;
$('my_form_field').value='what I want the value to be';
function success_function(transport)
{
var json = transport.responseText.evalJSON(true);
// p
Jim,
Did Jason's code not work?
And you're right, the examples and docs totally suck... it's like trying to
decipher some secret code that someone forgot to let the rest of us
"normal" programmers in on.
The purpose of AJAX calls is to reduce bandwidth and server hits by
reducing the number of p
Thanks Phil,
I do want to call a javascript function.
But let me try to simplify my problem.
Here is a page . . .
new Ajax.Updater('myDiv', 'XYZ.html', {evalScripts: true}) ;
Here is the page being called . . .
sayHi = function(){
alert ('Hi');
};
This will work, in the sense that myDiv
I think I know what is going on
in the first example - everything runs as normal and nothing happens
because you are just declaring a function in the external script - the
function is not called - plus getLottoNumber() is not defined
the second example you are requesting a javascript file - but a
then perhaps we're not understanding what you mean by "passed"
normal process is:
onSuccess: call a function that processes the incoming data
onFailure: tell the user what happened
what gets "passed" is data.
what gets "called" are functions.
having code in an external file indicates to me you w
Thanks for your response. I'm sorry, I forgot to mention I had tried that.
The request is successful (as I mentioned I can pass html and php, just
not javascript)
On Friday, July 27, 2012 7:35:11 AM UTC-4, ppetree wrote:
>
> Try using the onsuccess on failure parameters in Ajax updater.
>
> onF
Try using the onsuccess on failure parameters in Ajax updater.
onFailure: function() {alert("bombed");},
onSuccess: ...
On Jul 27, 2012 12:04 AM, "Jim Longo" wrote:
> If it helps, I can replace the js with something real simple (an alert)
> and it still won't run in the AJAX page. If I put plai
12 matches
Mail list logo
