[Antoine]
> Can you simply post a link every quarter to this list?
I would find that convenient as well.
Regards,
Matt
___
PSF-Community mailing list
PSF-Community@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community
Can someone remind me where the PSF's budget is posted? Some Googling
doesn't seem to find it for me.
Regards,
Matt
___
PSF-Community mailing list
PSF-Community@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/psf-community
[Marc-Andre Lemburg]
> Let's practice some more by engaging the voting members in more
> decisions and by the time we run next year's board election, things
> should have settled in just fine (so he says...).
I personally think that's an excellent idea. And here's a thought:
PEP 1 says that a PEP
Please correct me if I get any quoting below wrong, it seems to have
come through a bit confused.
[Steve Holden]
> For Heaven's sake. We elect a board to look after these issues. You
> can't expect to second-guess every deliberation. If you want to do
> that, stand for the board.
[Karl Karsten]
>
[Marc-Andre]
> Thank you for explaining your concern in more detail. This makes it
> easier to understand why you think we should have put this up for a
> members vote.
> the board remains ultimately responsible for any decisions in this
> direction.
I disagree. I think that the membership is ult
Steve,
> I would remind Matthew that the long experience of many boards was
> that the membership generally didn't want to be bothered with the
> details of what was done on their behalf.
I would be sad to think that. I'm mostly silent because I generally
think that the board does a splendid job.
Marc-Andre,
> Changes to bylaws are usually implemented by the board. They can
> also be put up to vote with the voting members and for larger
> changes, the board will generally take that approach.
> In this particular case, this wasn't deemed necessary,
Thank you, that is an answer to my quest
Ewa,
> I will work on making it more obvious in the future. That is all we
> can do
I'm sorry but it's not completely clear to me what you mean by "all
we can do". Taken literally, that seems to mean that board
resolutions can't be changed. But that doesn't seem likely to be the
case. Do you mean
Ewa,
> you should be able to access to archives here:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/private/psf-vote
I didn't remember that discussion and, grepping through the text
there, I find a small number of hypothetical suggestions buried in a
thread in which someone requested background information.
Marc-Andre,
> We did consult the existing sponsor members
I'm sorry. perhaps I should have said: I'm surprised that the board
didn't consult the non-sponsor membership. Can you tell me the
thinking behind that?
> As I mentioned in the email, the main purpose is to simplify
> sponsor signup.
Tha
Marc-Andre,
> the board has just approved an amendment of the PSF bylaws to
> remove the sponsor membership category.
That seems like a big enough change to me that I'm surprised that he
membership wasn't consulted. Can you tell me the thinking behind that?
Regards,
Matt
___
11 matches
Mail list logo
