Please correct me if I get any quoting below wrong, it seems to have
come through a bit confused.
[Steve Holden]
> For Heaven's sake. We elect a board to look after these issues. You
> can't expect to second-guess every deliberation. If you want to do
> that, stand for the board.
[Karl Karsten]
"The psf-board-public mailing list, which is used for board discussions
which are not legally or otherwise sensitive, allowing them to be shared
with the wider PSF membership."
- https://wiki.python.org/psf/Info%20for%20new%20PSF%20members
That does not seem accurate, and I consider it a problem.
Stand for the board and make sure it becomes more transparent? S
Steve Holden
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 3:15 PM, Carl Karsten
wrote:
> All of the people nominated for the PSF board are good people who will do
> good things. If things were running smooth, I wouldn't