Hello there.
After searching Avid's site, I only find the ProTools HD update. Am I
missing something? Thanks much.
Ginny
Thanks Kevin for your serious answer!
Ronald
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptacc...@googlegroups.com] Namens
Kevin Reeves
Verzonden: dinsdag 15 juni 2010 20:59
Aan: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: Functions in PT like Sound Forge
The basic editin
Hi Ginny,
So far, Digidesign have only released the 8.0.4 update for HD systems.
Their site says that the update for LE and M-powered users will be
coming soon, so currently it's a case of hoping that their definnition
of the word soon is similar to your own.
Hth, there are people on this list ch
Hey Ginny. GOod to see you on the list. They haven't yet rolled out the M
Powered version yet, But LE and HD are currently available according to several
sources. I've just moved back to Nashville, and have been busy with that, so
haven't seen the avid site yet to confirm. Hope this helps.
On J
Hello again,
There is a new Mac Mini released, but doesn't seem to be much more powerful
than last batch. The fastest model has an Intel Core 2 Duo at 2.66ghz, 4 or
8 gb of ram and a harddisk of max 500gb at 5400rpm. Firewire 800 is present
though. Do you think such machine is capable of running PT
Hi Ronald,
I've mixed 32 track sessions with a minimum of one plugin per track on
a Mac mini with worse specs than those, so yeah, it should serve you
well enough unless your needs are intensive. You'll want to work with
an HDD faster than 5400rpm though for multitracking, so either go for
a smal
and if they are true to form as of yet, it should be in a couple days or so.
just keep checking the site, no one knows the day nor the hour. lol
GF
On Jun 16, 2010, at 8:44 AM, Kevin Reeves wrote:
> Hey Ginny. GOod to see you on the list. They haven't yet rolled out the M
> Powered version y
I think he started the craziness, if I am not mistaken. "gun to a knife fight?"
I just took that and ran. lol. You must be reading fro newest to oldest. lol.
GF
On Jun 16, 2010, at 4:54 AM, RvR wrote:
> Thanks Kevin for your serious answer!
>
> Ronald
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van:
I don't even see the LE version. Has anyone else been able to find it? If
so, I'll go a-hunting again.
J
Ginny
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptacc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of clarence griffin
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 9:18 AM
To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re:
Hi, guys.
I have a wimpy-looking little Korg surface that has the transport buttons
and faders and knobs for 8 tracks. It doesn't always work perfectly, but
for GB and Logic it has done a rather decent job-especially since it only
cost $59.
When looking for other such surfaces, I see the
I can appreciate a joke, but he gave at least some useful info LOL
Ronald
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptacc...@googlegroups.com] Namens
clarence griffin
Verzonden: woensdag 16 juni 2010 16:22
Aan: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
Onderwerp: Re: Functions in PT
well I don't use PT as of yet, waiting for the MPowered version. when that day
comes. it will be heaven on earth. I am all setup as far as hardware and all
hat. just waiting for the download.
There are loads of hotkeys to learn. its going to be quite a busy list here. I
can't wait.
GF
On Jun
The difference from the korg you mentioned and the Project Mix IO is that the
Project Mix is a control surface and interface combined. What you need to look
for is any control surface that is compatible with the Hui Protocol. That's
what will interface with Pro Tools. J L Cooper makes some prod
On Jun 16, 2010, at 9:26 AM, Scott Chesworth wrote:
> Hi Ronald,
>
> I've mixed 32 track sessions with a minimum of one plugin per track on
> a Mac mini with worse specs than those, so yeah, it should serve you
> well enough unless your needs are intensive. You'll want to work with
> an HDD fas
I thought I saw both LE and HD versions of 8.0.4.
GF
On Jun 16, 2010, at 10:28 AM, Ginny Owens wrote:
> I don’t even see the LE version. Has anyone else been able to find it? If
> so, I’ll go a-hunting again.
> J
> Ginny
>
>
> From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptacc...@googlegroups
Is the Mini Server usable as normal Mini? What are besides the missing dvd
drive the other differences between the server and normal one?
The two 500gb 7200rpm sound good. Need to get an external usb or firewire
dvd-drive though.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [m
Hello
On Jun 16, 2010, at 12:36 PM, RvR wrote:
> Is the Mini Server usable as normal Mini? What are besides the missing dvd
I am not certain if server is that much different from the standard desktop
build that you couldn't just add apps to it. If it is a problem then getting a
$29 copy of th
Hi.
I anticipate that many people will have this thought, wanting to use the Mini,
since it seems like the most inexpensive Mac. It isn't a good idea, in most
cases. Mostly, the cases where it is a good idea involve you already owning
one. I wouldn't buy one new for the purpose of running Pro T
very nice brake down.
GF
On Jun 16, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Bryan Smart wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I anticipate that many people will have this thought, wanting to use the
> Mini, since it seems like the most inexpensive Mac. It isn't a good idea, in
> most cases. Mostly, the cases where it is a good idea i
Hi Brian,
Also came to the conclusion that an iMac would be a better choice. I always
refused to pay for a monitor thats attached to the iMac which I don't even
use, but it's the best option I think now for all the reasons you have
mentioned too.
The new Mac Minis are more expensive than before. Th
Yeh. It is particularly confusing to blind people when I tell them that the 27
inch iMac is probably the best value for high performance. I know that they all
think "but I don't need a 27 inch monitor." The thing is, though, they will
need some sort of monitor , if not because a Mac won't run ri
Hi. Speaking of Imacs, do we know if Apple plans to put TI firewire in any
of the Imacs when the line is refreshed?
Thanks,
Cameron.
-Original Message-
From: ptaccess@googlegroups.com [mailto:ptacc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Bryan Smart
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 11:33 PM
No. They never talk about what they'll do with hardware in future machines.
The Firewire controller in the iMac works just fine with audio interfaces under
OS X. I know people that use them with Logic, as well as using 003s with Pro
Tools. I'm not so sure how they'll work under Windows, though.
Hi. yes, that is exactly my concern. I'd go for a mac pro desktop if I
could use a firewire interface on the mac side for pt and logic, and then
use the same interface with sonar on the windows side.
I don't know anyone with a current Imac either so can't test it out.
H.
Cameron.
24 matches
Mail list logo
