> "Gary" == Gary <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gary> Would there be any tax advantage for them to donate the
Gary> equipment to a 501(c)(3) like PTP? If so, why not continue the
Gary> same model for deployment of other PTP nodes? I guess that's
Gary> assuming that the SkyPilot base stations ar
http://www.wherecamppdx.org/
"WhereCampPDX is a free unconference focusing on all things
geographical. This informal meeting of minds welcomes all geo-locative
enthusiasts, anyone who asks "where am I" or feels the need to 'know
their place'."
Beaconing wifi routers have become as important as G
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 2:30 AM, Sam Churchill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't understand how PTP is going to land a deal with PP&L, or get
> a bucket truck, or manage a system even if the city decides to give
> PTP MetroFi's equipment for free. And why should they.
I don't see PTP settin
> "Sam" == Sam Churchill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sam> I don't understand how PTP is going to land a deal with PP&L, or
Sam> get a bucket truck, or manage a system even if the city decides
Sam> to give PTP MetroFi's equipment for free. And why should they.
I think the idea that Michael ha
Would there be any tax advantage for them to donate the equipment to a
501(c)(3) like PTP? If so, why not continue the same model for deployment of
other PTP nodes? I guess that's assuming that the SkyPilot base stations are
usable by themselves.
Doesn't VeriLAN still give free access to most of G
I don't understand how PTP is going to land a deal with PP&L, or get
a bucket truck, or manage a system even if the city decides to give
PTP MetroFi's equipment for free. And why should they.
I don't see why you should assume MetroFi WON'T take their gear down.
Mike Rogoway seems to be the only
