Re: [ptxdist] ncurses-5.7 build hangs

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 08:27:36AM +0200, Floimair Florian wrote: > I can confirm this, as I already ran into the same issue some months > ago. I somehow fixed it, but don't ask me exactly what I did as this > is already some time ago. Sending patches is a good solution for this problem :-) rsc -

Re: [ptxdist] [ptxdist-commit] [PATCH] [glibc] introduce symbol for the dynamic loader

2009-08-12 Thread Marc Kleine-Budde
Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:13:11AM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: >> Until this patch the installation of the dynamic loader was coupled to >> the glibc. This patch makes it possible to select the glibc but don't >> install any libs at all. > Out of interest: what's the u

Re: [ptxdist] [ANNOUNCE] ptxdist-1.99.17 released

2009-08-12 Thread Ryan Raasch
Robert Schwebel wrote: On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 09:32:05PM +0200, Remy Bohmer wrote: - We finally learned how to run git in a "centralized" way, which is mandatory for using it in a corporate environment (where you have to make sure that the universe continues rotating even if one person is

Re: [ptxdist] [ANNOUNCE] ptxdist-1.99.17 released

2009-08-12 Thread Bjoern Buerger
Am Mi, 12 Aug 2009 schrieb Ryan Raasch: > > Would be cool for you to elaborate! I have been using git for over a > year in an subversion environment, and it seems you have found a > sweet spot between the two. Well, it's mostly a matter of finding the right balance between the centralized aproa

Re: [ptxdist] ncurses-5.7 build hangs

2009-08-12 Thread Floimair Florian
Well, I didn't build it with ptxdist as a consequence, because I wasn't that familiar with it at the time. ;-) With best regards Florian Floimair Technical Support COMMEND INTERNATIONAL GMBH A-5020 Salzburg, Saalachstraße 51 Tel: +43-662-85 62 25 312 Sip: f.floim...@commend.com Fax: +43-662-85

[ptxdist] package build rules

2009-08-12 Thread Markus Rathgeb
Hello! Which package build rules will be applied to the ptxdist tree? What is the process a rule set have to pass to be included? Best regards, Markus -- Markus Rathgeb Public Key Server: http://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net/ bzw. hkp://wwwkeys.us.pgp.net/ Public Key Server: http://stinkfoot.org:11371/ b

Re: [ptxdist] package build rules

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:23:51PM +0200, Markus Rathgeb wrote: > Which package build rules will be applied to the ptxdist tree? > What is the process a rule set have to pass to be included? Well, it has to be there :-) The order is: - if a rule is available in the project, use that - if not, ch

Re: [ptxdist] package build rules

2009-08-12 Thread Markus Rathgeb
Oh, I asked not exactly... If a xxx.rules xxx.in are posted here, in which case it will be added to the project. On Wednesday 12 August 2009 21:27:10 Robert Schwebel wrote: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:23:51PM +0200, Markus Rathgeb wrote: > > Which package build rules will be applied to the ptxd

Re: [ptxdist] package build rules

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 09:31:23PM +0200, Markus Rathgeb wrote: > Oh, I asked not exactly... > > If a xxx.rules xxx.in are posted here, in which case it will be added > to the project. Ah, they usually will, if there are no direct objections here on the list. From time to time it may happen that t

Re: [ptxdist] ncurses-5.7 build hangs

2009-08-12 Thread Enrico Weigelt
* Floimair Florian schrieb: > Well, I didn't build it with ptxdist as a consequence, because I wasn't that > familiar with it at the time. ;-) do you still have the full tree of your fixed version laying around ? BTW: if someone likes to have a look at my branch, see git://git.metux.d

Re: [ptxdist] ncurses-5.7 build hangs

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Schwebel
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 01:13:01AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Floimair Florian schrieb: > > Well, I didn't build it with ptxdist as a consequence, because I wasn't > > that familiar with it at the time. ;-) > > do you still have the full tree of your fixed version laying around ? > > BTW: i