Hi,
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 05:41:24PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Am Dienstag, 20. August 2019, 17:34:06 CEST schrieb Roland Hieber:
> > At least as far as I can see, ptxdist never supported a "ptxdist
> > menuconfig u-boot" for u-boot packages (yes, the "ptxdist u_boot_config"
> > option
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 04:23:47PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> while upgrading different BSPs to kernel v5.2.x I came accross a special
> build
> error. Affected is the kernel.compile stage. This happens with different
> ptxdist versions (tested with 2018.05.0, 2019.01.0, 2019.07.0,
Hello Roland,
Am Dienstag, 20. August 2019, 17:34:06 CEST schrieb Roland Hieber:
> At least as far as I can see, ptxdist never supported a "ptxdist
> menuconfig u-boot" for u-boot packages (yes, the "ptxdist u_boot_config"
> option could have been named better…).
It does for a while now, see
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 04:27:41PM +0200, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Hei hei,
>
> does this affect U-Boot itself?
At least as far as I can see, ptxdist never supported a "ptxdist
menuconfig u-boot" for u-boot packages (yes, the "ptxdist u_boot_config"
option could have been named better…). Does
Hei hei,
does this affect U-Boot itself?
Greets
Alex
Am Dienstag, 20. August 2019, 16:21:57 CEST schrieb Roland Hieber:
> Fixes: 8def36f40f44f2cdb83c ("u-boot-v2: remove in favor of barebox")
> Signed-off-by: Roland Hieber
> ---
> bin/ptxdist| 15 +--
>
Hei hei,
while upgrading different BSPs to kernel v5.2.x I came accross a special build
error. Affected is the kernel.compile stage. This happens with different
ptxdist versions (tested with 2018.05.0, 2019.01.0, 2019.07.0, 2019.08.0) and
at least with kernel v5.1 and v5.2 (IIRC kernels at
Signed-off-by: Roland Hieber
---
bin/ptxdist | 1 +
doc/ref_parameter.inc | 5 +
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bin/ptxdist b/bin/ptxdist
index d7bf4d5ffc5d..343d80a7052e 100755
--- a/bin/ptxdist
+++ b/bin/ptxdist
@@ -947,6 +947,7 @@ Build Actions:
go
Fixes: 8def36f40f44f2cdb83c ("u-boot-v2: remove in favor of barebox")
Signed-off-by: Roland Hieber
---
bin/ptxdist| 15 +--
rules/other/Namespace.make | 1 -
tests/make_uboot_v2_env| 29 -
3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 44
Signed-off-by: Ladislav Michl
---
Hi,
this update brings a question: Shall we use global option
for linux-crypto as we do for SELinux?
Packages have support for cryptodev and/or AF_ALG netlink,
so having these options at one place make some sort if sense.
Choice between software crypto