Dan is right on many front... (it usually true:-)
- I personally do not see a problem this being done on ESW, this does not mean
any type
of formal 'Association' with W3C (giving you a writing right is a matter of
setting up a
user for you and sending, eg, me or dan a mail to add you to the acce
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:54 AM, Daniel O'Connor
wrote:
>
>
>>> The first question is: How do we define which resources are members of a
>>> list?
>>>
>>
> Perhaps a dead simple way to do it is
> http://sw.deri.org/2007/07/sitemapextension/ - you lose some of the
> semantic expressiveness, but yo
>
>> The first question is: How do we define which resources are members of a
>> list?
>>
>
Perhaps a dead simple way to do it is
http://sw.deri.org/2007/07/sitemapextension/ - you lose some of the semantic
expressiveness, but you list resources.
On Sat, 2009-12-12 at 21:42 +, Jeni Tennison wrote:
> To put this in context, what I think we should aim for is a pure
> publishing format that is optimised for approachability for normal
> developers, *not* an interchange format. RDF/JSON [1] and the SPARQL
> results JSON format [2] aren
Hi Jeni
I wonder whether ORE Aggregations could be (part of) a solution:
http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/toc
Greetings
Herbert Van de Sompel
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 13, 2009, at 15:20, Jeni Tennison wrote:
Hi,
Dave (Reynolds) raised the point that lists are an integral part of
m
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Dave Reynolds
wrote:
> Hi Jeni,
>
> [Rest of post snipped for now, I'll respond properly later. Seems like we
> are on sufficiently similar wavelengths that it is "just" a matter of
> working the details.]
>
>> I don't know where the best place is to work on this:
Hi Jeni,
On Sat, Dec 12, 2009 at 9:42 PM, Jeni Tennison wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As part of the linked data work the UK government is doing, we're looking at
> how to use the linked data that we have as the basis of APIs that are
> readily usable by developers who really don't want to learn about RDF or
Hi,
Dave (Reynolds) raised the point that lists are an integral part of
most APIs. This is another thing that we know we need to address in
the UK linked government data project, but are unsure as yet how best
to do so.
This is a bit of a brain dump of my current thinking, which is mostly
Hi Jeni,
[Rest of post snipped for now, I'll respond properly later. Seems like
we are on sufficiently similar wavelengths that it is "just" a matter of
working the details.]
I don't know where the best place is to work on this: I guess at some
point it would be good to set up a Wiki page or
Hi Dave :)
On 13 Dec 2009, at 13:34, Dave Reynolds wrote:
Jeni Tennison wrote:
As part of the linked data work the UK government is doing, we're
looking at how to use the linked data that we have as the basis of
APIs that are readily usable by developers who really don't want to
learn abou
On 12 Dec 2009, at 22:33, Damian Steer wrote:
In terms of code accessing the results there isn't much difference.
The former requires an initial path to the array ['results']
['bindings'], then the use of ['value'] for each access.
Is true. As I said, I'm a lot less concerned about the JSON
On 12 Dec 2009, at 22:27, Danny Ayers wrote:
I can't offer any real practical suggestions right away (a lot to
digest here!) but one question I think right away may some
significance: you want this to be friendly to normal developers - what
kind of things are they actually used to? Do you have an
>
>> Daniel,
>
> What's the aversion to simply thinking in SPARQL re. Freebase?
>
I can think in both, MQL just is more readily accessable to me and with the
freebase query editor, more easily learned.
>
> Freebase folks: Why not provide a SPARQL option (basically a SPARQL to MQL
> translator i
Hi Jeni,
Jeni Tennison wrote:
As part of the linked data work the UK government is doing, we're
looking at how to use the linked data that we have as the basis of APIs
that are readily usable by developers who really don't want to learn
about RDF or SPARQL.
Wow! Talk about timing. We are lo
Frederick,
Thanks, that looks interesting, and the idea of supporting similar
mappings to XML and to CSV is very attractive.
But I couldn't actually work out how I would use it in the kind of
situation we find ourselves in. We have, for example, RDF like this:
http://education.data.gov.
Damian Steer wrote:
> On 12 Dec 2009, at 21:42, Jeni Tennison wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As part of the linked data work the UK government is doing, we're looking at
>> how to use the linked data that we have as the basis of APIs that are
>> readily usable by developers who really don't want to learn
16 matches
Mail list logo
