Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

Hi Michael, that's great! If [2] were to be updated with that [1] (i.e. officially containing RDFa about these URI:s), and would be 303:d to from [3] (along with anything under that URL), this would be all we need. I know it hasn't happened for years, but sometimes a nudge at just the right time m

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

Michael Hausenblas wrote: > Nathan, Phil, All, > >> and quote: >> "If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be >>considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/"; >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt >> >> obviously all the links def

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

2010/4/3 Michael Hausenblas : > Niklas, > >> While I have seen definitions of these relations made by the community >> before (e.g. used directly in AtomOwl, and a complete listing made by >> Ed Summers, which I unfortunately cannot find now), > > You're not peradventure talking about [1], no? > >

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

Nathan, Phil, All, > and quote: > "If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be >considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/"; > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt > > obviously all the links defined by: > http://www.iana.org/ass

Re: write enabled web of data / acl/acf/wac etc

2010/4/3 Nathan > Hi All, > > Simply looking for the best place to discuss acl/acf/wac / write enabled > web of data etc - mailing list or irc or private contacts - unsure if > this comes under the banner of "linked data" and thus this mailing list. > i.e. whilst I can have a good realtime discu

Re: write enabled web of data / acl/acf/wac etc

> Simply looking for the best place to discuss acl/acf/wac / write enabled > web of data etc - mailing list or irc or private contacts - unsure if > this comes under the banner of "linked data" and thus this mailing list. > i.e. whilst I can have a good realtime discussion about rest related > th

write enabled web of data / acl/acf/wac etc

Hi All, Simply looking for the best place to discuss acl/acf/wac / write enabled web of data etc - mailing list or irc or private contacts - unsure if this comes under the banner of "linked data" and thus this mailing list. i.e. whilst I can have a good realtime discussion about rest related thin

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

Nathan, > and quote: > "If the relation-type is a relative URI, its base URI MUST be >considered to be "http://www.iana.org/assignments/relation/"; > http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03.txt Just for the record: the current draft of Web Linking is [1] and the stateme

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

Niklas, > While I have seen definitions of these relations made by the community > before (e.g. used directly in AtomOwl, and a complete listing made by > Ed Summers, which I unfortunately cannot find now), You're not peradventure talking about [1], no? Cheers, Michael [1] http://mediatyp

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

Niklas Lindström wrote: Hi, I definitely think IETF should place RDF representations at those locations, as Henry suggests (e.g. 303 to say ). Is there really no way we could make this happen? Since the UR

Re: Using predicates which have no ontology?

Hi, I definitely think IETF should place RDF representations at those locations, as Henry suggests (e.g. 303 to say ). Is there really no way we could make this happen? Since the URI:s are used directly in m